CathInfo.com

Where do you get the idea that Templars were studying Hebraic mysticism? Quote a source from before 1950 because almost all modern authors have an anti-Christ agenda or something wrong with their approach. What were they studying it for?

The Templars were most likely a very powerful Order that earned the ire of the Jews, and through various manipulations, got members of the Church itself to turn against them. Who knows how much of what is said about them is mudslinging.

Just look at the facts though -- the Templars once controlled world finance, basically. Now who controls it? You think there might be something up here? It could be argued that the Templars were too wealthy for their own good, and that money power should be left decentralized. That being said, better the Templars have the money than the Jews -- unless they became totally corrupted and Satanic, of course, and having loads of money does tend to do that.

This all makes me think of what I was saying about the Great Monarch, that if he is real, the Antichrist is an ape of him as well as of Christ. The devil just imitates everything. This is clear enough from the number 33 that the Masons try to appropriate for themselves, along with other Catholic symbols. I once made the mistake of thinking they really were connected, the Templars and Masons... But if they were, if some secret project of the Templars is being carried forth by Masons, we have no proof of that.

The religious devotions of the Templars or Emperor Rudolf are the concern of our Catholic upper-crust nobility and not a proper concern of we more simple sons and daughters of the Catholic peasantry.

For us to bash the Catholic Templars and aristocracy for their upper-class interests in things like alchemy, astrology and the Hebrew writings is dangerously presumptuous of Catholic commoners like us who are woefully ignorant of such recondite concerns of our historic Catholic leadership.  In particular, there is an Hebraic CATHOLIC mysticism and an Hebraic Jєωιѕн mysticism and never the twain between them shall meet.  To know the difference between these two radically opposed things is very largely the business of our Catholic aristocracy and their noble relations in the Catholic clergy and not of common Catholics of all or mostly peasant descent like ourselves.

Aristocratic bloodlines became tainted by intermarriage to the daughters of Jєωιѕн banking families and have largely either become extinct or decamped to the other side. Is any significant portion of the aristocracy still left to the Catholic cause?

My opinion is that every Catholic has the duty to become Jew wise, not just hereditary aristocrats.

Quote from: guitarplucker

Quote from: LaramieHirsch

P.S.  The historian Jones refers to is fully named Thomas Walsh, author of the book Philip II.

Better known as William Thomas Walsh.

It should be noted that William Thomas Walsh, perhaps the greatest Catholic historian in the English language of the Twentieth century, held the Templars to be innocent.

many do, Chincon parchement is rather interesting and tends to turn history on its head........