I just read an article/summary by E. Michael Jones about his new book, Barren Metal.  He stated that it is pretty much a sequel to The Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit.  

There was one part in this article that caught my attention.  I thought it rather peculiar.  Maybe I'm reading it wrong.  But it seems like he supports Pope Francis' economic opinion about capitalism.  In fact, Jones makes it appealing to accept Pope Francis' condemnation about capitalism, and he does this under the premise that pure unleashed capitalism is very destructive.  

Take a look:

http://www.culturewars.com/2014/Strangled.htm

It’s clear that a new wind is blowing from Rome. The pope and Cardinal Rodriguez of Tegucigalpa, his right hand man, are open in their criticism of capitalism, whose pernicious effects are exponentially worse in third-world countries like Honduras. In addition to condemning Capitalism, the pope has also shown himself willing to intervene when he feels that a bishop is not doing his job. The pope’s intervention into the management of the Vatican Bank is one example of what I’m talking about. The case of the Bling Bishop in Germany is another. On October 23, 2103 Bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst was suspended from his post as bishop of Limburg for cost overruns on the renovation of diocesan facilities. Six months later, on March 26, 2014, the pope accepted Bishop Tebartz-van Elst’s resignation.[13] Is allowing the subversion of Catholic Social Teaching less of an offense than spending too much money on a bathtub? If that is not the case, then hasn’t Bishop Walkowiak forced the Vatican’s hand by refusing to act against Sirico and the Acton Institute, both of which are notorious in Rome? Why is a man who spent his earlier career as a promoter of sodomy and his current career as a promoter of usury a priest in good-standing in the Catholic Church? Aren’t sodomy and withholding the wages of the worker sins that cry to heaven for vengeance?  Even Wikipedia knows that much Catholic theology.[14] How can a priest who has made a career of promoting two of the four sins that cry to heaven for vengeance be a priest in good standing in the Catholic Church? Does the Church stand for anything anymore? Is Rome willing to act when the local bishop isn’t? Is paying too much for a bathtub worse than condoning sins that cry to heaven for vengeance?

I've been looking forward to Barren Metal all year.  In this book, I believe Jones will lay out just how specifically the Catholic people here in the United States are screwed by an evil Judaic system of usury.  But to think that Jones might be sympathetic to Pope Francis in any way--I find that interesting.  Myself, I'm not a fan at all of our new pontiff.  I can't think of one thing he's done that I'm grateful for.  Yet, here we have E. Michael Jones, fighter of the Christ Killers himself, and he's found something seemingly positive about Pope Francis.  Jones has always been able to think outside the box.


---

About the book, here's a little more:

Barren Metal is, among other things, the story of the rise and fall of economics as the self-regulating mechanism. It is the story of the rise of capitalism as the regime of state-sponsored usury. It is the story of the awakening of the German mind in the face of this threat and the creation of the Germanic-Catholic alternative to the English Newtonian model of economics as pseudo-physics. It is the story of the theft of labor.

In addition to being a history of Capitalism, Barren Metal is the sequel to The Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit.

On one of his walks through Paris, Honore de Balzac, the French novelist, encountered the richest man in France strolling arm in arm with Heinrich Heine, the revolutionary who did his best to overthrow Capitalism during the Revolution of 1848. Viewed from a political or an economic perspective the two men should have been on opposite sides of the revolutionary barricades, but Balzac was smart enough to see that ethnic blood ran thicker that political water, no matter how turbulent. Heine the Revolutionary and Rothschild the financier could walk arm in arm because both men were Jєωs and because together they embodied “tout l’esprit et tout l’argent des Juifs.”

In America, both the spirit and the money come together at think-tanks like the American Enterprise Institute. Rich Jєωs funding revolutionary Jєωs and their movements is nothing new. Jacob Schiff funded the Bolsheviks. Lloyd Blankfein supports gαy marriage, the prime Jєωιѕн revolutionary movement in our day. Rich Jєωs, like David Rubenstein, co-founder of the Carlyle Group, fund the American Enterprise Institute, which paid for Michael Novak’s book.  That book has corrupted the mind of every single American bishop, if not directly then through initiatives like the Manhattan Declaration, orchestrated by Robbie George, another mouth that feeds at the AEI trough.

 

Good stuff, this.