I would say don't worry about it.  Here's why:

978. The principles governing the lawfulness of material cooperation
will be treated at length below in their proper place among the sins
opposed to charity. But since, on account of the mixed conditions of
society today, there are innumerable cases of material cooperation in
religion, it will be useful to state in advance in this place the
principles bearing on material cooperation and their application to
cases on religion and worship. The principles are the same as those
given for an act that has two effects, one good and the other bad.
Hence, material cooperation is not lawful, except when the following
conditions are present:

(a) The action of him who cooperates must be good in itself or at least
indifferent, for of course, if it is evil, it is not lawful. Thus, if a
person were to give to one pagan temple objects he had stolen from
another temple, his action would be intrinsically sinful on account of
the theft. Similarly, if a person were to contribute to a collection
list as "sympathizer" with a school for the propagation of atheism or
as "beneficiary" from the sacrifices to be offered an idol, his act
would be intrinsically sinful as being a promotion of error or
superstition, even though he were not really a sympathizer with atheism
or a believer in idols.

(b) The intention of him who cooperates must be good; for, if he wills
to help a false religion, he is guilty of formal cooperation; if he
wills some other wrong end, he is guilty of some other species of sin.
Thus, if one who does not believe in idolatry contributes to it on
account of sympathy with anti-Christian movements, he is guilty of
enmity to the truth.

(c) There must be a reason for the cooperation proportionate to the
gravity of the sin which will be committed by others, to the proximity
and necessity of the cooperation, and to the obligation which one has
of preventing the sin of others. Examples: To contribute to a sect
which plots the downfall of legitimate authority is never lawful, for
there is no reason of temporal or private good that can be a
compensation for the destruction of the public good. To contribute to
the building of a Mohammedan mosque does not require so serious a
reason as to contribute to the building of a pagan temple, for mosques
are not used for idolatry. A graver reason is needed to justify ringing
the bell or ushering the people to their seats for a service of false
worship than to justify sweeping and dusting the temple the day before
the service, for in the former case the cooperation is closer. A
greater reason is required to build a house of false worship, when
there is no one else to build it, than when there are many others who
will gladly build it if one refuses, for in the former case one's
cooperation is so necessary that without it the false worship cannot
take place, but not so in the latter case. A much more serious reason
would be required to justify parents conducting their children to a
place of false worship than would be required to justify a public
chauffeur in taking passengers thither; for the parents have a special
duty to guard the religion of their children.

.
From McHugh and Callan, available in full here: http://archive.org/stream/moraltheologyaco35354gut/35354.txt

Makes sense except Mosques are used to worhip Satan so that wasn't the best example.

Why complicate the issue by bringing mosques in to it? 

And what do want for nothing?

I am in a similar situation, but I am not asking for any advice as I was forced to retire.

Although I have my TESL (Teaching English as a Second Language) credential, I cannot teach in the local colleges or high schools because I would be forced to use the Pearson textbooks which promote abortion, euthanasia, same sex marriage, gαyness as an acceptable lifestyle, cohabitation, etc.

The chapters in the text which promote this ungodliness are major chapters that cannot be ignored.

It is important for our youth to investigate thoroughly what profession they wish to learn before signing up for classes, for they may find themselves in a profession which is morally incompatible with Catholic beliefs.

I am in a similar situation, but I am not asking for any advice as I was forced to retire.

Although I have my TESL (Teaching English as a Second Language) credential, I cannot teach in the local colleges or high schools because I would be forced to use the Pearson textbooks which promote abortion, euthanasia, same sex marriage, gαyness as an acceptable lifestyle, cohabitation, etc.

The chapters in the text which promote this ungodliness are major chapters that cannot be ignored.

It is important for our youth to investigate thoroughly what profession they wish to learn before signing up for classes, for they may find themselves in a profession which is morally incompatible with Catholic beliefs.

You would not have to use textbooks in a collegiate setting and your views would be respected.

Makes sense except Mosques are used to worhip Satan so that wasn't the best example.

.
As someone who is uncertain about the morality of delivering newspapers, you're not really in a position to be questioning the teachings of approved moral theologians.
.

You would not have to use textbooks in a collegiate setting and your views would be respected.

New, part-time, or adjunct teachers who do not have tenure cannot select their own text books. Most teachers of ESL must go along with the Chair and  the majority decision who elect texts that the students will purchase. It involves the bookstore, as they want books that sell.

If there are low enrollments for certain sections of ESL, those classes will be canceled. If everyone is on the same page, fewer books will be returned, and costs for the bookstore will be reduced, as these books can be held over for the next semester.

Only teachers with tenure can choose their own texts. However, these tenured professors teach multiple sections whereas new or adjunct instructors only teach one or at most two classes.

Besides Pearson is a monopoly. Go check their website. They control the books and almost all collegiate tests (like PSAT, SAT, and GRE) that most students must use.