Quote from: alaric

Quote from: Mithrandylan

So you only have stats to divert from the point.  Very nice.  Very un-liberal of you.

Here's a stat for you Mithra, as far as the Brevik case is concerned.

Not one rape was committed by a white Norweigan last year in Norway. Not one.

With all of the attacks on the native females were perpetuated by black and Middle eastern Muslims while the liberal gov't tries to bring in as many as they possibly can, you wonder why young white European men are flipping out.

That's interesting.  If this thread is formally changing topics to the rape of white women by non-white then so be it, but it doesn't speak in any way to whether or not black guys make up the majority of serial killers in the US.  

On topic, Brevik and the Colorado chap are debatable serial killers.  The one thing about serial killers is that part of the definition is usually that the killings are spaced.  Though both Brevik and James whats-his-name killed out of some psychological motive and killed more than three people, they did not do it with the habitual frequency traditionally seen in serial killers.  Further, they more or less "planned" to be caught, whereas most serial killers do no such thing.  In fact, most serial killers consider themselves to be untouchable which is usually why they end up getting caught.  But they don't plan to be.  

I believe your right on the definition of "serial killer", actually, like I posted, Brevik believes he's a Crusader and basically made a statement, perhaps in order to start an awakening or revolution or even become a martyr for the cause. The problem is, Europe and especially Scandinavia has become so insanely liberal and Socialist, that instead of giving him the death penalty which he deserves and even asked for they would rather approach it as he just has some mild, psychological issues and had the equivalent of having a bad day. They are absolutely nuts with liberalism over there, no wonder this guy went on a shooting spree, killing the sons and daughters of communists and leftists of course.

The Colorado guy is just batsh*t crazy.

Neither are "serial killers".

But the perp that committed the largest mass murder in American history was non-white if that makes you pause for a minute about how nonwhites aren't in the majority of "serial-killers".



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Tech_massacre

Also the D.C. snipers were two black men;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks

John Muhmmad and Lee Malvo were African Americans;

I wrote MOSTLY or USUALLY.  Just because someone of another race does something mostly done by white males, doesn't blow the whole case.  The case still holds true.

Wisconsin killer of 6 people on a hunting trip......was nonwhite.

This Chinese man shot 8 people including four in the back. including a woman over him being asked to leave private property, so he preceded to hunts humans, white people of course.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chai_Vang

As Thorn pointed out, mass killer =/= serial killer.  Not sure if one is more deranged than another, but serial killers work methodically and over time.  Mass killers, while they might plan meticulously, plan for one occurrence.  Or in the case of that guy in WI who killed the hunters, maybe not plan at all.

A serial killer derives special joy from their ritual.  Not that a mass murderer couldn't, but serial killers are heavily vested in ritual and habit.  

As far as the 2000 decade having almost 60% of serial killers being black: first, I'd be interested to see when the study was done, if in the mid 2000's or after 2010, and I'd also like to know if it's the actual number of serial killers or if it's the percentage of of victims owed to serial killers of each race.

I'm not all that surprised that this decade has more serial killers that are black.  The DC snipers were two black guys, and then of course there's Anthony Sowell in Cleveland.  A few others this decade that escape my mind.

If someone wants to point out that serial killers require lots of attention to detail and planning (which is true) and then go to say that since most serial killers are white and use that as evidence that white people are predisposed to superior intelligence, I'd point out that by the same token white people seem to have a predisposition to possession, being deranged and devoting themselves to something wholly and totally evil.  And one or both of the above may be true or not-- but it's nothing worth bragging about.  

Anyways, Alaric, I would never say white people have a monopoly on serial killing.  Go to any country that isn't predominantly white and you'll learn that.  But I am saying that of serial killers in America, black people are a minority.  That is verifiably true.

'Racism' is indeed anchored in reality, as is 'sexism'.  Anyone who believes differently has their head in the sand, &/or is too steeped in 'leftism' & must watch too much TV.

It seems to me that the greatest serial killers are the abortionists.  I don't care what race they are.  It's a waste of time trying to figure out what color servants of Satan are.  

Anyway, this batman shooting is very suspicious.  The "witnesses" I saw are an insult to whatever intelligence I like to think I have.