Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Dogmas of the conciliar sect  (Read 1343 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6882
  • Reputation: +3849/-406
  • Gender: Male
  • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
Dogmas of the conciliar sect
« on: November 02, 2013, 03:10:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Since many heresies are allowed in the conciliar sect, there are few dogmas. But there are a few things that must be believed in order to be a member in good standing in the conciliar sect. I can think of three:

    1. There is salvation outside the Catholic Church.

    2. 6 million Jєωs died in the h0Ɩ0cαųst, and many of these died in gas chambers.

    3. Vatican 2 must be believed and all the other councils can be ignored.

    Can you think of any other dogmas in the conciliar sect?
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.


    Offline Mario153

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 11
    • Reputation: +21/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #1 on: November 02, 2013, 03:34:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 4. The Pope can change or contradict "old" dogmas. As a matter a fact, it is a good thing he updates the antiquated beliefs of misguided and primitive Catholics from the dark ages.

    5. Every pope since John XXIII is impeccable (sinless) throughout his pontificate. Also EVERYTHING these popes said or did was guided by the Holy Spirit.

    6. The road to heaven is wide and the vast majority succeed in making it there, and the road to perdition is narrow and only judgmental traditionalist are in jeopardy of losing their souls.

    7. It is heroic virtue to pray with other non Christian religions.

    8. Martin Luther actually had a lot of good points.

    9. Besides Vatican II there are ONLY two other dogmas: the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption.

    10. Marriage is a higher vocation than religious life or priesthood.

    11. There are only two types of Catholics, liberals and conservatives. Liberals kind of push the popes buttons sometimes and conservatives LUV the pope and are just the best!


    Offline Matto

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6882
    • Reputation: +3849/-406
    • Gender: Male
    • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #2 on: November 02, 2013, 03:37:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I forgot one

    12. Using NFP is always good and never a sin.
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.

    Offline LoverOfTradition

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 318
    • Reputation: +179/-1
    • Gender: Female
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #3 on: November 02, 2013, 03:47:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 13. Popes are chosen by the Holy Spirit.

    14. Vatican II put an end to Modernism, so says Cardinal Maradiaga.

    Offline Mario153

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 11
    • Reputation: +21/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #4 on: November 02, 2013, 04:44:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • More conciliar "dogmas" and other such new beliefs

    15. Medjugorje is of "Mary" and the Charismatics are of the "Spirit".

    16. The Novus Ordo is merely the latest version of the "Latin" Rite.

    17. The Official Languages of the Church are Italian, Polish, Spanish, English and Hebrew.

    18. Altar "girls" will increase vocations to the sisterhood.

    19. Active participation of the laity at Mass is best done IN the sanctuary, you know, that sacred space near the table.

    20. Saturday 4pm is actually Sunday.

    21. Consecration is synonymous with entrustment. Also, the correct way to say "Russia" is either "those individuals and nations which particularly need to be thus entrusted and consecrated" or simply "the world".


    Offline icterus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 713
    • Reputation: +0/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #5 on: November 02, 2013, 05:18:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 22.  There's no particular reason to Baptize someone, and thus no hurry.

    23. All troublesome passages in scripture can be explained away by 'sensitivity to genre'.

    24. There is no inconsistency in the priest carefully purifying vessels while the extraordinary lay ministers of communion simply dust off their hands.

    Offline ultrarigorist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 577
    • Reputation: +905/-28
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #6 on: November 02, 2013, 06:50:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :roll-laugh1:

    Well done...

    Offline Mithrandylan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4452
    • Reputation: +5061/-436
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #7 on: November 02, 2013, 09:59:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Although these are all "dogmas" of the Conciliar Church inasmuch as they are status quos, it's important to remember that the Conciliar Church doesn't have any dogmas, properly speaking.  Yes, a given Conciliar churchman will insist on a given "dogma" when it is convenient, but as a body it lacks any foundation in objective truth, and therefore necessarily rejects all dogmas.  
    "Be kind; do not seek the malicious satisfaction of having discovered an additional enemy to the Church... And, above all, be scrupulously truthful. To all, friends and foes alike, give that serious attention which does not misrepresent any opinion, does not distort any statement, does not mutilate any quotation. We need not fear to serve the cause of Christ less efficiently by putting on His spirit". (Vermeersch, 1913).


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #8 on: November 03, 2013, 04:43:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    You left out the biggie:  

    To deny the Principle of Non-Contradiction is quite normal and acceptable.

    .
    .
    .

    Therefore, we have the "hermenuetic of continuity,"

    The Syllabus of Errors teaches the same thing as the Counter-Syllabus, Vat.II;

    Having "dogmas" is one and the same thing as having NO DOGMAS;

    All Christians share in the Royal Priesthood of Baptism, and so there is
    nothing special about an ordained priest -- nothing whatsoever;

    But to be baptized is the same thing as to not be baptized, so it's not important;

    Yes means no and no means yes (si si, no no -- out the window, you go!);

    Believing in a Catholic God is the same thing as disbelieving in any God;

    Grace is the same thing as disgrace;

    Up is down and down is up;  heaven and hell are identical;

    God, satan -- what's the difference?

    Good and evil coexist in the same person at the same time, so get over it;

    A beach ball and WYD T-shirt are perfectly appropriate items for the High Altar,
    but placing a Buddha on the tabernacle is so 1986!

    Adhering to Tradition is the same thing as making a 'deal' with modernist Rome;

    Hiding your AFD for a year is the same thing as "withdrawing" it;

    The Rosary crusade intention for the Collegial Consecration of Russia to the
    Immaculate Heart of Mary by the Pope and all the Bishops of the world is
    the same thing as having the intention of "freeing" the Canonized Traditional
    Latin Mass, even though it was never abrogated;

    Marian Devotion and contempt for the Message of Fatima are compatible twins.

    Saying (incorrectly) that the Newmass was "legitimately promulgated" is the
    same thing as saying (correctly) that the Newmass was never promulgated at all;

    Denouncing Modernism is the same thing as not denouncing Modernism;

    Keeping the Commandments of God is the same thing as breaking them;

    And last but not least, love of God and hatred of God are one and the same thing.



    .





     
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #9 on: November 03, 2013, 05:05:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    The ink dried.................  

    BTW, all of the previous posts in this thread and all of the subsequent
    posts in this thread (even by s2srea who will 'desire' to contradict this)
    are and will be consequent to, and CONTAINED WITHIN, the post
    immediately above this one.  

    That is to say, that not one of the many excellent suggestions of the
    other fine members of CI here will be, nor can they be, more prominent
    and all-inclusive as the denial of the principle of non-contradiction.  

    For once the principle of non-contradiction is denied, there is no truth,
    there can be no truth, the truth cannot be known and the truth even
    if it exists and can be known, cannot be communicated.  

    The denial of the principle of non-contradiction is the END of all logic
    and all of right reason.  It is, in a word, insanity, utter foolishness,
    intellectual catastrophe, moral ruin, total corruption, and invincible
    yet culpable ignorance, which is the unforgivable sin.


    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5768
    • Reputation: +4622/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #10 on: November 03, 2013, 05:28:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • First, in regards to the above posts, what is "AFD"?  

    Second, I think all of the above can be summed up in one "dogmatic statement":

    Whatever Conciliar popes, bishops, priests, theologians, Directors of Religious Education, liturgists, and anyone else with some sort of authority says is correct when they say it and if you think anything they say somehow conflicts with other teaching, whether it be current or "ancient" (i.e., before 1960) teaching, you're just too stupid to understand the bigger picture.

    The sole Commandment of the Conciliar sect is:  Give us your money.

    P.S.  They don't even care if you come to church anymore now that they've figured out they can get people to authorize automatic withdrawals from their checking accounts.


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #11 on: November 03, 2013, 08:16:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Great posts, especially Mario!

    NeilObstat. I am flattered you are always thinking of me. God bless you.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #12 on: November 03, 2013, 10:33:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: s2srea
    Great posts, especially Mario!

    NeilObstat. I am flattered you are always thinking of me. God bless you.



    You're welcome -- but not 'always' really, just when it's appropriate.

    Like now, for example.


    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #13 on: November 03, 2013, 08:46:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    This one item was a little fuzzy:

    Quote
    The Rosary crusade intention for the Collegial Consecration of Russia
    to the Immaculate Heart of Mary by the Pope and all the Bishops of
    the world is the same thing as having the intention of "freeing" the
    Canonized Traditional Latin Mass, even though it was never abrogated.



    It's really two different topics, but they are related:


    The Rosary crusade intention for the Collegial Consecration of Russia
    to the Immaculate Heart of Mary by the Pope and all the Bishops of the
    world is not made with the expectation that the Consecration will be
    done, but rather it is made in order to garner support of the Faithful: it
    WAS good PR.  But now it's outdated, and no longer useful, so it is
    abandoned.  Therefore, since the priority is the political mileage to be
    derived from it, some substitute effect must be found, whatever that
    might be.  

    Having the intention of "freeing" the Canonized Traditional Latin Mass
    even though it was never abrogated is another useful tool to garner
    support of the Faithful, and if the effect could be achieved ("freeing"  the
    Mass) then the political mileage would be an available product at large
    for the taking, and then all the Rosaries can be said to have applied to
    that achievement, and/or any others, such as the so-called lifting of the
    excoms, even though the excoms for ABL and BAdCM were never
    so-called lifted.  (This "lifting" is all smoke and mirrors anyway because
    the only real action would be to annul them.)  

    In both cases, there is a deception, and prayer is being used for a play
    thing, a political football, a tactic to manipulate the religious sense of the
    Faithful.  That is not what prayer is for, and as such these deceptions are
    a denial of the virtue of the purity of intention.  


    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Dogmas of the conciliar sect
    « Reply #14 on: November 03, 2013, 09:42:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TKGS
    First, in regards to the above posts, what is "AFD"?




    Fr. Francois Chazal came up with the acronym 'AFD' to refer to the
    April Fifteenth Declaration of XSPXSGBF, otherwise known by a
    variety of names (such as the Doctrinal Declaration of 2012 or the
    Doctrinal Preamble - both of which are unfortunately easily confused
    with other docuмents with the same or nearly the same names).  



    Quote
    Second, I think all of the above can be summed up in one "dogmatic statement":

    Whatever Conciliar popes, bishops, priests, theologians, Directors of Religious Education, liturgists, and anyone else with some sort of authority says is correct when they say it and if you think anything they say somehow conflicts with other teaching, whether it be current or "ancient" (i.e., before 1960) teaching, you're just too stupid to understand the bigger picture.



    That's an interesting outlook.  What you describe is a KEY
    underlying principle of the unclean spirit of Vat.II, which is a
    demonic spirit -- it is of the devil.  Alstair Crowley pretty much
    laid the foundation for Vat.II in his satanic bible, the main point
    of which is simply summarized as, "Do what thou wilt is the
    whole of the law."
     Translated into "hippie-speak" of the
    abominable 1960's, it became, "Do your own thing."  But as
    applied to the local bishops, the principle is found in several
    places, among which is SC 22.2, the paragraph to which many
    other parts of the docuмents refer for this principle.


    Quote
    The sole Commandment of the Conciliar sect is:  Give us your money.

    P.S.  They don't even care if you come to church anymore now that they've figured out they can get people to authorize automatic withdrawals from their checking accounts.



    Sorry to hear that.  I entirely sympathize with you.  Auto debits
    are the bane of modern accounting practices.  Don't get me started.

    Every time I go to the bank a teller urges me to set up auto bill pay
    with a checking account, and I'm convinced that the tellers are
    getting some kind of bonus for customers who sign up for it, but
    the tellers have to be stupid to do that because if everyone has
    auto bill pay there are going to be a lot of tellers looking for
    another job.  So they are encouraging customers to do something
    that will effect the need for fewer tellers.

    There is a utility that has a robot payment kiosk that accepts
    cash from you to pay your bill.  At the end of your transaction it
    always asks, "Do you want a receipt?"  That question did not make
    any sense to me.  Why would someone put cash into a machine
    without any human being to witness it, and not get a receipt?  One
    day, having been unable to tolerate my ignorance, I dare to ask a
    salesperson on the floor this question.  She told me that most of
    their customers choose to not get a receipt for cash payments!  I
    was flustered.  So it wasn't just the machine and an idiot
    programmer who wrote the software!  Another customer standing
    there overhearing our conversation offered her testimony, for
    which I was extremely grateful, but looking back I might not have
    given her the impression that I was appreciative!!  (If you know
    what I mean!)  She said that she doesn't want to have a pile of
    pieces of paper that she has to keep track of and throw away
    when they become too numerous, and also, it "saves trees" to not
    have so much wasted paper.  (These receipts are on thermal
    paper and measure about 2" wide and 7" long.)  I rejoined, "What
    is everyone going to do if the system fails and memory is lost
    and the company has no record of you making a cash payment?"

    Both the saleslady and the customer were incredulous in unison.  
    They harmonized -- speaking practically the same words together,
    as if on cue in a movie!   It sounded like a mechanical voice of a
    robot with a sort of echo. "That's never going to happen!"  Then
    they diverged with things like, "We have several backups so data
    will never be lost,"
    and, "The system is always reliable," and, "We
    have never had any problem like that,"
    and, "These machines are
    built with the latest technology."  


    Keep in mind, it is the COMPUTER that makes ALL BUSINESS
    DECISIONS for the company.  There is absolutely no negotiating
    possible with the manager of the store or the representative on
    the phone in a call center somewhere in Plano Texas or Atlanta
    Georgia.  The Computer is the final authority in all terms and
    conditions.  And the Computer is therefore pretty much the
    god of the utility,
    and both sales people and customers are
    perfectly on board with this BEAST situation, arising right in plain
    sight before our very eyes, that is, if we have eyes to see!


     

    I don't think this is too much off topic, speaking of dogmas of
    the Conciliar sect.  It is a kind of false god situation, no?



    And I really appreciate all these clever and perceptive posts on
    this thread, even if it may look like they insult me.  Bring it on!  
    Maybe I need it!  The fruit so far here in this thread is very good,
    and I can take a lot of abuse.  Believe me, this is nothing.  

    Oh, and s2srea, you're most welcome to stir up more of whatever
    it is!  (I know, I know, I thought of you again!  Isn't that special?!)   :smile:


    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.