Race matters.  It's not just skin color.  It's the ancestry of hundreds of generations.

The asian-American men in this country must really be offended by the manner in which the women of their own race reject them.

So what is the big deal about "interracial" marriage?  We are all souls made in the image of Almighty God.  In baptism, we are all brothers and sisters of Christ.  Even St Paul made no distinction... So why should we?  As long as we are united in the Faith, nothing else matters.

 

Why is it that white women never date asian guys then? You hear a lot of them say they just aren't attracted to asian guys. On top of it all, they are increasingly voicing about how they prefer black men. If things were so even, then this would not be happening. They would like asian men just as much as black guys and every other race for that matter. Unfortunately, asian men are smaller and less muscular on the average. Not to mention other taxonomical differences. Im surprised they dont get mad when (as telephorus suggested) asian women go with white men. I know I would.

People end up on the poop end of the stick because of interracial dating. Asian men and black women end up empty handed. Guys like me end up single because Im not all that interested in asian women (some I like I will admit) and I refuse to date a white woman who has gone black. Yeah hispanic women can be nice looking from time to time. I like black women sometimes too but they usually have an attitude that is unattractive.

Really the agenda boils down to trying to make things socially acceptable for white women and black guys to be together. Thats about it. White women don't want to be looked at negatively for it, and black guys just want a sexier more feminine women thats easier to get along with.

In the end you end up with some angry white guys who find out that their woman has been blacked. It really just causes problems between white men and white women. Not all the time but a lot of times. A lot of white guys don't like it. Black guys think its funny.

Quote from: Maria Elizabeth

So what is the big deal about "interracial" marriage?  We are all souls made in the image of Almighty God.  In baptism, we are all brothers and sisters of Christ.  Even St Paul made no distinction... So why should we?  As long as we are united in the Faith, nothing else matters.

 

How can anyone who holds the Catholic faith disagree wit this statement?

We are not all souls made in the image of Almighty God.  We were once upon a time, but since then there have been those "minor details" known as Original Sin and the Fall.  Since then we are  made as embarrassingly distorted images of God who are only worthy of His wrath, not his indulgent permissiveness.  In baptism we are all brothers and sisters in Christ, but that has nothing to do with personal or racial equality.  As Catholics we are equal morally and in death, but not in any other way.  St. Paul said we are one in Christ as Romans, no longer as Greeks,Hebrews, male or female, but he never implied that we are therefore personally equal as Romans.  He means that as Catholics we are Greco-Romans, Hebreo-Romans, male Romans or female Romans, not that we are interchangeable machine parts in the Great Bolshevik Collective.  St. Paul certainly did make distinctions between Romans.  He was just saying that as Catholics we are all citizens of Eternal Rome, the one true City of God.

Who is united in the faith?  Disembodied immaterial spirits as the apostate Novus Ordo teaches us?  Equal Neo-Liberal Marxist cadres ceaselessly ecstatic about the bare existence of money as our Novus Ordo-approved government commands us?  We are united in the faith as the created human beings whom the Lord hath made.  Hence we are united as different races, sexes, classes, individuals and so on.  Yet the Good Lord in His infinite wisdom did not make us to be a dreary mixed-race brown, a unisex, a boorish mindless proletariat.  God could have done, but He does not suffer from amnesia and He made us as He most thoughtfully knew best.

So are we to correct God in his ignorant, illiberal, forgetful work of Creation?  Do we know better than He?  God made the races of man, but we know better and must correct his human biology with an omnipresent muddy brown as quickly as possible.  Apparently His Creation isn't good enough for people like us (some sort of immaterial angels?) who are so able to redo Creation right.  No doubt the Novus Ordo false religion, namely whichever Marxist faction happens to be currently on top in their incessant power struggles, teaches us that "faith" destroys nature and turns us all into equally useless egalitarian Red Robots.  

Of course this self-satisfied ѕυιcιdє is for Catholics and other non-Jews only.  Jews must be most carefully excluded from all this "enlightenment."  Perhaps Jews are simply "too good" to be mere Roman Catholics like we lesser mortals.  But it remains curious how this fiery righteousness stops dead in its tracks the moment Jews come into the picture.  Why isn't race-mixing so mandatory for their Chosen Race Highnesses?  Morality never applies to those suspiciously helpless Jews, the one and only actual Master Race.

Jєωιѕн Marxist egalitarianism has destroyed the earth, the economy, the family, marriage.  It proceeds to destroy every race and nation (except one!) in universal racial and national genocide.  "How can anyone who holds the Catholic faith disagree with this?"  We can and we do disagree and precisely in the name of the Catholic Faith.  

In most cases miscegenation is a mortal sin against the Creation that the Lord hath made.

   

We are not all souls made in the image of Almighty God.  We were once upon a time, but since then there have been those "minor details" known as Original Sin and the Fall.  Since then we are  made as embarrassingly distorted images of God who are only worthy of His wrath, not his indulgent permissiveness.

I'm pretty sure you're in error.

48. What is man?

Man is a creature composed of body and soul, and made to the image and likeness of God.

(a) The soul and the body are not loosely connected parts of man, they are united in a substantial union to form one complete human nature. The soul is not located in any particular member of the body but is whole and entire in each part.

49. Is this likeness to God in the body or in the soul?

This likeness to God is chiefly in the soul.

(a) All creatures bear some resemblance to God inasmuch as they exist. Plants and animals resemble Him insofar as they have life, but none of these creatures is made to the image and likeness of God. Plants and animals do not have a rational soul, such as man has, by which they might know and love God.

50. How is the soul like God?

The soul is like God because it is a spirit having understanding and free will, and is destined to live forever.

(a) Men are especially like God when they know and love Him:

first, in a merely natural way without the aid of grace;
second, in a supernatural way here on earth, with the aid of grace;
third, in a perfect way in heaven, with the aid of the special] light God gives to the souls of the blessed.

(b) Understanding is the power of the soul to apprehend, to judge, and to reason, and thus to know right and wrong.

(c) Conscience is that judgment by which we decide here and now what we should do as good or avoid as evil.

(d) Free will is that power of the soul to choose either to act or not to act.

(e) Human souls live forever because they are spirits.

(f) The never-ending life of the soul is called immortality.

51. Who were the first man and woman?

The first man and woman were Adam and Eve, the first parents of the whole human race.

(a) The theory of evolution which teaches that higher forms of life develop from lower forms has offered no convincing, scientific proof that the human body developed gradually from that of a lower animal.

(b) If scientific proof of such development of the body of man could be had, it would not be opposed to Catholic doctrine provided that some special action of God is admitted not only in the creation of the soul but also in the production of the body of Adam.

(c) The human soul, being spiritual, could not possibly have developed from a lower, material form of life.

(d) Sacred Scripture teaches that Adam's soul, like every human soul, was created directly by God.

52. What was the chief gift bestowed on Adam and Eve by God?

The chief gift bestowed on Adam and Eve by God was sanctifying grace, which made them children of God and gave them the right to heaven.

(a) Sanctifying grace is a supernatural gift which is a sharing in the nature of God Himself and which raises men to the supernatural order, conferring on them powers entirely above those proper to human nature.

(b) Together with sanctifying grace God gave Adam and Eve the super natural virtues and the gifts of the Holy Ghost.

53. What other gifts were bestowed on Adam and Eve by God?

The other gifts bestowed on Adam and Eve by God were happiness in the Garden of Paradise, great knowledge, control of the passions by reason, and freedom from suffering and death.

(a) These gifts are not supernatural or above all created natures, but they are preternatural, that is, beyond the powers of human nature, though not above all created natures.

(b) If Adam had not sinned, these gifts would have been transmitted to all men as the possession of human nature.

Somewhat related:

Immortality Viewed as a Natural Condition of Man
17. The proposition stated in these words: "Taught by the Apostle, we regard death no longer as a
natural condition of man, but truly as a just penalty for original guilt," since, under the deceitful
mention of the name of the Apostle, it insinuates that death, which in the present state has been inflicted
as a just punishment for sin by the just withdrawal of immortality, was not a natural condition of man,
as if immortality had not been a gratuitous gift, but a natural condition,—deceitful, rash, injurious to
the Apostle, elsewhere condemned

I am down thumbing your posts.  I am not a liberal.  I am a Catholic, who believes what the Catholic Church teaches about race.  Namely, that we are all human.

Yeah we are all "human" however there is a difference amongst the races. That is a scientific fact. It seems you have been around your Jєωιѕн family members for much too long.

Although, truth be told, it's not much different than the boat devoutly religious men are in this society with respect to churchy girls, and their parents who would prefer they have develop careers before marriage (and so encourage them to turn away Christian suitors) than to marry and have families, all the while the parents are sticking their heads in the sand.

It's either one way or another. Families either want their daughter to have a career or to be attracted to a rich man with a nice career.

Quote from: Traditional Guy 20

Quote from: InfiniteFaith

Yeah right

Is that sarcasm or agreement?

Neither. I disagree with what you are saying. I don't believe interracial between blacks and whites is common in the deep south.

Then you obviously don't live in Atlanta. I see it all the time. Plenty of strapping, good-looking white guys with their lives in order and these white women dating "gangsta" black guys because MTV says it's cool.

Quote from: clare

God makes "dreary mixed-race brown" people.

God made the "dreary mixed-race brown" St Martin de Porres, for example.

And in His image too!

Is "dreary mixed-race brown" any way to talk about people created in God's image?

So clare how do you like your multi-racial, multicultural Britain?

You do know that most of the immigrants to Britain are Indo-Europeans from Pakistan or Indians from northern India or Eastern Europe, right ?