Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Do you believe this?  (Read 14881 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Traditional Guy 20

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3427
  • Reputation: +1662/-51
  • Gender: Male
Do you believe this?
« Reply #45 on: December 27, 2012, 12:27:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PereJoseph
    Since when are Atlanta and South Carolina the "Deep South" ?


    Um South Carolina and Georgia are indeed considered a part of the Deep South.

    Offline brotherfrancis75

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 220
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #46 on: December 27, 2012, 12:28:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • [quote from Mr. bowler] You will notice that both the Black Africans, and the Indian/Mestizo South Americans, are both primitive cultures, "converted savages". It does seem like their have not been enough good willed European examples to teach by example the ways of Our Lord Jesus Christ, and be able to remove the wildness in these peoples, as they seem to constantly be falling back to savagery. The enemies of God want it this way.

    You will find that the same happens to the European lower classes. The young tatood to the hilt, toothless at 30, American blond hair blue eyed trailer types, come to mind as an example. [/quote]


    In my lowly opinion it's very important that we try to be honest and "real" about the most difficult topics like race.  The above quote from Mr. bowler is unpleasant, but he is also simply having the charity to say things as they truly are.

    Many great Catholics (among whom this writer can not be included!) have noted that our typical Catechisms are too vague about the true effects of the Fall on mankind.  We also usually fail to mention the key role of Kingship in Adam's role as the much-loved Founder of the Human Race.  Hence there were no humans before Adam, but there were hominids before Adam.  In Adam's Divine Kingship our ancestors all became humans for the first time in the hierarchic and radically non-egalitarian inequality that is the very essence of our humble yet also exalted humanity.  So Adam and Eve were truly the first humans, but they were not then the only humans because they were most noble monarchs who first established a hierarchic human race capable of being described as such.

    This has everything to do with the white Indo-Europeans!  Catholic Eternal Rome is the supernatural unity of humanity, but this is only possible because the white Indo-Europeans are the naturally universal race that is alone able to unite humanity under its leadership on the natural level.  Sometimes we have led unwisely (remember the apple) but only the best and most noble of us white folk are able to be the actual effective leaders of the human race.  The Bible says this quite often and our entire history is a most vivid evidence of the truth of my statement.

    My numerous critics like to demand that I quote Canon Law to support my controversial thesis that miscegenation is normally a mortal sin against children.  Catholic Canon Law supports the marriage laws of Catholic States and those marriage laws have always most strictly restricted marriage among Catholics to the lawful subjects of our historic Catholic Holy Roman Empire and its associated National Monarchs.  Illegal aliens are, according to our historic laws, not legally marriageable!  Historically non-white persons have NEVER been accepted into citizenship or subjecthood in any of our Roman Catholic States or Empire.  Negroes and Jews have also always been most strictly excluded from our Roman educational institutions as well.  The normal strict racial segregation of Jews and Negroes in our Catholic Christendom is so well known that it shouldn't require any special proof by this writer here.

    Why then did our beloved Catholic ancestors so carefully exclude Jews and Negroes from citizenship or legal membership in our Catholic Empire and Nations?  Why were they always so carefully excluded from eligibility for legal marriage?  Because Catholics should respect the hierarchic Creation as Our Lord has freely decided to make it.  Because it is not for us to dictate to God how He ought to have made the human race and then try to remake the human race according to the misguided false notions of the anti-Catholic French and Russian Revolutions.

    Truthfulness is not uncharitable.  On the contrary.  To be an inferior Roman Catholic human being is no small honour.  Obviously we are all of us personally both superior to many and inferior to many.  That is the very essence of our human condition and the reason that compassion is such an important virtue among us.  We should gratefully follow the lead of our betters and be kind and considerate towards our inferiors.  To pretend that as humans we are somehow really all the same "under the skin" is the height of envy and dishonesty.  Such enviousness ought to be the last thing we should want as truly charitable Roman Catholics.

    Let us rejoice in our wonderful human inequality and not ungratefully deny the most essential hierarchic truth of God's Creation.



    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #47 on: December 27, 2012, 12:30:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: bowler


    The term Hispanics includes South Americans of 100% European blood, therefore, there is an error in what you wrote, since they are European, just like Italians, French, Spanish, Portuguese and, the Irish, etc.

    A more accurate description would be Indian/Mestizo South Americans.

    Therefore, in the future, you should be more accurate and say:

    You will notice that both the Black Africans, and the Indian/Mestizo South Americans, are both primitive cultures, "converted savages". It does seem like their have not been enough good willed European examples to teach by example the ways of Our Lord Jesus Christ, and be able to remove the wildness in these peoples, as they seem to constantly be falling back to savagery. The enemies of God want it this way.

    You will find that the same happens to the European lower classes. The young tatood to the hilt, toothless at 30, American blond hair blue eyed trailer types, come to mind as an example.


    Yes of course, Indians or Mestizos south of the border.

    I do agree about the white trash types as well although living in a trailer or apartment by itself does not make you "white trash."

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #48 on: December 27, 2012, 12:32:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PereJoseph
    You do know that most of the immigrants to Britain are Indo-Europeans from Pakistan or Indians from northern India or Eastern Europe, right ?


    You can call them whatever you like, they aren't British and are coming into Britain in record numbers. Gypsies are also not of the same ethnic origin as French or Italians for instance.

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #49 on: December 27, 2012, 12:47:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: brotherfrancis75
    In my lowly opinion it's very important that we try to be honest and "real" about the most difficult topics like race.  The above quote from Mr. bowler is unpleasant, but he is also simply having the charity to say things as they truly are.

    Many great Catholics (among whom this writer can not be included!) have noted that our typical Catechisms are too vague about the true effects of the Fall on mankind.  We also usually fail to mention the key role of Kingship in Adam's role as the much-loved Founder of the Human Race.  Hence there were no humans before Adam, but there were hominids before Adam.  In Adam's Divine Kingship our ancestors all became humans for the first time in the hierarchic and radically non-egalitarian inequality that is the very essence of our humble yet also exalted humanity.  So Adam and Eve were truly the first humans, but they were not then the only humans because they were most noble monarchs who first established a hierarchic human race capable of being described as such.

    This has everything to do with the white Indo-Europeans!  Catholic Eternal Rome is the supernatural unity of humanity, but this is only possible because the white Indo-Europeans are the naturally universal race that is alone able to unite humanity under its leadership on the natural level.  Sometimes we have led unwisely (remember the apple) but only the best and most noble of us white folk are able to be the actual effective leaders of the human race.  The Bible says this quite often and our entire history is a most vivid evidence of the truth of my statement.

    My numerous critics like to demand that I quote Canon Law to support my controversial thesis that miscegenation is normally a mortal sin against children.  Catholic Canon Law supports the marriage laws of Catholic States and those marriage laws have always most strictly restricted marriage among Catholics to the lawful subjects of our historic Catholic Holy Roman Empire and its associated National Monarchs.  Illegal aliens are, according to our historic laws, not legally marriageable!  Historically non-white persons have NEVER been accepted into citizenship or subjecthood in any of our Roman Catholic States or Empire.  Negroes and Jews have also always been most strictly excluded from our Roman educational institutions as well.  The normal strict racial segregation of Jews and Negroes in our Catholic Christendom is so well known that it shouldn't require any special proof by this writer here.

    Why then did our beloved Catholic ancestors so carefully exclude Jews and Negroes from citizenship or legal membership in our Catholic Empire and Nations?  Why were they always so carefully excluded from eligibility for legal marriage?  Because Catholics should respect the hierarchic Creation as Our Lord has freely decided to make it.  Because it is not for us to dictate to God how He ought to have made the human race and then try to remake the human race according to the misguided false notions of the anti-Catholic French and Russian Revolutions.

    Truthfulness is not uncharitable.  On the contrary.  To be an inferior Roman Catholic human being is no small honour.  Obviously we are all of us personally both superior to many and inferior to many.  That is the very essence of our human condition and the reason that compassion is such an important virtue among us.  We should gratefully follow the lead of our betters and be kind and considerate towards our inferiors.  To pretend that as humans we are somehow really all the same "under the skin" is the height of envy and dishonesty.  Such enviousness ought to be the last thing we should want as truly charitable Roman Catholics.

    Let us rejoice in our wonderful human inequality and not ungratefully deny the most essential hierarchic truth of God's Creation.


    I do agree that different races are created unequal as are different individuals in the same peoples. Let's face it we are not meant to be equal and never will be.



    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2626/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #50 on: December 27, 2012, 01:05:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Quote from: PereJoseph
    Since when are Atlanta and South Carolina the "Deep South" ?


    Um South Carolina and Georgia are indeed considered a part of the Deep South.


    To my knowledge, I always thought South Carolina and Atlanta, GA are the "Deep South".

    Alabama and Mississippi and Louisiana too!

    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2626/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #51 on: December 27, 2012, 01:20:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It all goes back to my first post about people falling in love with and marrying who they will.  


    Offline PereJoseph

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1411
    • Reputation: +1979/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #52 on: December 27, 2012, 01:29:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Quote from: PereJoseph
    Since when are Atlanta and South Carolina the "Deep South" ?


    Um South Carolina and Georgia are indeed considered a part of the Deep South.


    Maybe in South Carolina and Georgia they are considered to be part of the Deep South, but people in the Deep South (Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana) certainly don't think so.


    Offline PereJoseph

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1411
    • Reputation: +1979/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #53 on: December 27, 2012, 01:33:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Capt McQuigg
    Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Quote from: PereJoseph
    Since when are Atlanta and South Carolina the "Deep South" ?


    Um South Carolina and Georgia are indeed considered a part of the Deep South.


    To my knowledge, I always thought South Carolina and Atlanta, GA are the "Deep South".

    Alabama and Mississippi and Louisiana too!


    Those places are commonly called the "Old South," the Deep South being the places now known as the States of Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana.

    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2626/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #54 on: December 27, 2012, 01:34:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Love goes where it will...  

    If someone is strongly against marrying outside their race, then they should by all means not do it.  

    Like that old song from the sixties...  Love grows where my rosemary goes and nobody knows but me... or something like that.

     :cool:

    Offline InfiniteFaith

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1590
    • Reputation: +168/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #55 on: December 27, 2012, 02:02:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Capt McQuigg
    Love goes where it will...  

    If someone is strongly against marrying outside their race, then they should by all means not do it.  

    Like that old song from the sixties...  Love grows where my rosemary goes and nobody knows but me... or something like that.

     :cool:


    And if we got rid of most of the illegal immigrants people would be falling in love with other people of their own race. There is absolutely nothing wrong with either of the 2. People wouldn't know the difference.


    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #56 on: December 27, 2012, 02:03:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Capt McQuigg
    Love goes where it will...  

    If someone is strongly against marrying outside their race, then they should by all means not do it.  

    Like that old song from the sixties...  Love grows where my rosemary goes and nobody knows but me... or something like that.

     :cool:


    Right because one should be praising the 1960's aspects of sɛҳuąƖ revolution...

    Where would we be without sɛҳuąƖ freedom right? Lord help all of those before who had such "rules" about "love" as if a child even knows what that means (by child I mean our adult "children" as well).  It should be noted however that the 1950's was full of sɛҳuąƖ immorality too so the "stuffy" 50's is a myth.

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2755
    • Reputation: +969/-252
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #57 on: December 27, 2012, 02:53:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Okay.

    Y'all got that?  

    1. Non-whites are less than human, blacks, particularly are the least human of them all.

    2. Non-whites should not be educated with or in the same manner as whites.

    3. Non-whites, since they lack the glory of whites, are least capable of getting to Heaven when compared with whites.

    4. Somewhere in the Catechism, we can discern that mixing with anyone outside our own race is a mortal sin.  Therefore, if you have a mixed child, you should immediately go to confession and regret the child until your death.

    5. Mixed children are a morlock race that somehow God accidentally allowed to come into existence, and mixed children never ever occurred in history before the American sɛҳuąƖ Revolution--never.

    6. One day, with hard work, diligence, and the use of revolutionary force, we can create a white utopia absent of all non-white races and mixed-race morlocks, and that ought to be our goal in this world.

    7. This fondness for the white race and the world's inequality to this exclusive white race has absolutely no resemblance whatsoever to the Jєωιѕн utopian idea of a racially pure Jєωιѕн state that excludes all gentiles.




    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +28/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #58 on: December 27, 2012, 02:56:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Making scarecrows Laramie?  Who are you addressing?

    Offline Ascetik

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 581
    • Reputation: +421/-68
    • Gender: Male
    Do you believe this?
    « Reply #59 on: December 27, 2012, 02:59:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PereJoseph
    Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Quote from: PereJoseph
    Since when are Atlanta and South Carolina the "Deep South" ?


    Um South Carolina and Georgia are indeed considered a part of the Deep South.


    Maybe in South Carolina and Georgia they are considered to be part of the Deep South, but people in the Deep South (Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana) certainly don't think so.


    I guess Georgia's state title "Empire State of the South" isn't deep enough for trailer park southerners to the west of Georgia. Georgia is Dixie, Georgia was the one of the original 13 colonies, it literally is the south par excellence. If you don't think Georgia is deep south then you need to stop smoking meth with those people who live in the poorer southern states who have nothing better to do than watch Maury all day on TV and buy ingredients to make meth at walmart.

    Most people who say that are just sports freaks who want to rag on UGA and GA Tech.