Well, thanks for the advice, Incognito. What luck that the only posts of mine that you've read were snide remarks. You'd think the odds would have you reading at least one or two of the others. Where were you with your advice when Mike and John were goading Stephanos? I see you don't mention their snide remarks.
If you're talking about quotes you provided as evidence, sorry I don't see it. I saw John give his opinion about sedevacantism being a topic permitted on this forum. I suppose because the poster in question is a sede, this somehow offends your sensibilities? While Micheal can be abrasive at times, he certainly doesn't make it a habit of going around attacking persons, but rather their methods or erroneous beliefs. I know him also from other forums.
Try not to get all emotional over a forum, it serves no one, and tends to disrupt the flow of conversations.
Edited to add:
What kind of search did you do for Stephanos? I clicked on his username and then posts, and came up with all of his posts. More than half of them are about sedevacantism and the other half are made up of proof of how evil the hierarchy in the Church is/was which alludes to sedevacantism, mixed in with venomous attacks on posters. I don't know about you, but if someone called me a "comrade" or "juvenile" or "Novus Ordean" I wouldn't call it a compliment.
If you're interested in Zionism, Fisheaters has a section of their forum dedicated to that, without all the sedevacantist rhetoric.