You banned Capistrano?!  What have I missed?  May God reward you for it!  Yes, I'm much calmer these days than before, but there can be NO quarter given for these people who are trying to make Catholics out to be nαzιs.  They must be stopped with extreme prejudice.  I don't want them associating me and others with Hitler.  It's such an obvious trap, come on.

Moderators- Please look into this further.

You've seen my other posts about Diego. I just saw this, and it struck me as odd.

Diego came on here about the same time as Capistrano. I don't remember Diego really posting here much, actually at all, before Capistrano came on the scene. Now, since Capistrano had started, he'd been a Capistrano cheerleader and fan. I just noticed this too:

From the "The Zionist тαℓмυdic Jєωs" Thread

Quote from: Diego

If anything The тαℓмυd Unmasked understates the case.

The Truth About the тαℓмυd

You might peruse my Judaism 101 post in the Library section of this site.

Incredible site Diego!!

 No amount of ecuмenical dialogue with the Jєωs  will convert them as a whole. Indeed, what is the vatican up to promoting such lunacy, unless the church is neck deep in Jєωs. It does seem they have infiltrated the church even before the council.
 

Lets look at the stats of this Chaz fellow and Diego:

Diego
Level 1
Reputation: 44
(Likers: 10 / Critics: 2)
Group: Members
Posts: 51
Joined: Apr 25, 2010



chaz89
Level 1
Reputation: 18
(Likers: 6 / Critics: 2)
Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: Apr 15, 2010


Is it me, is something fishy, or are we getting close to Friday?

Your "suspicions" are pervasive. Who don't you "suspect"? Why not ban every newcomer who doesn't agree with you?

Actually, you and Chaz are hardly newcomers compared with me... I'm only pointing out what stands out to me so that others can be aware. And its not about disagreeing on any level really, only being careful for what both Matthew and Raoul have already tried to keep away from this site. Thats it Diego- nothing personal.

Thats a nice quote. But I also like:




Matt 7:15: Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

You know, Diego's posting style suddenly looks strangely familiar...

I've seen someone use the posting style you just used...one post containing numerous different spaced-out lines. Can't remember exactly who used that posting style. In another post, you underlined some words in your post, a posting style that Rob Sheenan used.

I have no accusations for you about anything against the Faith- which is why I haven't made any. But Capistrano wasn't necessarily banned for outright accusations against the faith on this forum- it took a little bit of, "hey look over here" to prove who he was. If this isn't you, you have nothing to fear. I only point out what I see as interesting correlations amongst 3 different members within a very short period of time. I leave it up to moderator to decide if he can see anything else (with what he as access to as moderator).

And its not like I'm dragging this on; I've made only one post on these curiosities this thread that I noticed this morning; the other posts I made were good enough for Moderator to respond to. Again, its nothing personal and if you're truly an honest person, then hopefully we can become friends and have good discussions here.

I've seen someone use the posting style you just used...one post containing numerous different spaced-out lines. Can't remember exactly who used that posting style. In another post, you underlined some words in your post, a posting style that Rob Sheenan used.

So, did I do a "look over here" to any offensive sites?  I did post a few secular sites, but in the context of asking people to help evangelize the Faith there. Last time I checked, none of you helped me, but there was no shortage of time and energy devoted to carping about "suspicions."

What "correlations"? That I found it interesting that Capistrano offered docuмentation of very surprising WW 2 history I had never heard before? "Correlations"? Only imaginary. There is no bogeyman here. That I defended him? I hope someone defends you when you deserve it.

I am not Capistrano. I am not Richard Ibryani. I am not Rob Sheehan (whoever that is). I had not even heard the name Ibryani until Matthew mentioned it and I looked him up. As best I can discern, he is a character of no great consequence. Then, after I heard the name here, I mentioned it and you became "suspicious." Look at the date stamps of Matthew's mention and my mention. I asked Matthew personally to clear this up, but he has not. Still "suspicious"?

Hear this: I am sympathetic to the grievances of sede vacantists, but I do NOT reach their conclusions. I am NOT a sede vacantist. I am NOT a missionary for sede vacantism.

Further, I had not even heard the name Robert Sheehan until SpiritusSanctus mentioned it.  Is he a sede vacantist? I sure don't know.

Besides, give all of us a break! When my comments are bullet points, I use the spacing that makes you "suspicious." When I am posting something more comprehensive (e.g., the Judaism 101 post to the Library), I don't use the same bullet point spacing.  

You were suspicious because of the esthetics on my posts???!!!  Good Heavens!  I think it is "suspicious" that someone would adopt the name of God, the Third Person of the Holy Trinity, to represent their human self on the internet.

You say, "You have nothing to fear."  Fear you? I am appalled.

Certainly you may detect that your behavior has left a very bad taste in my mouth. Yes, I will forgive 70x7, but I expected much better behavior here—a discussion of Catholic news and doctrine, not ad hominem sniping or tribal suspicion of outsiders.