It is also the first time I have ever seen the photo at bottom-- i very much suspect that it is photoshopped.
I suspected the same. Here is the original image. Obviously the day they received their MBEs.

Well, let's strike that one from the exhibit list then.
Now there's merely the matter of everything else... The obvious abortion imagery on the "Yesterday and Today" cover, the glorification of Aleister Crowley on Sgt Pepper, the embrace of Hindu diabolism, the "Christianity will disappear, we're bigger than Jesus" blasphemy, Lennon's going on to write the definitive anthem of atheism, and, if the Tony Sheridan quote is not sufficiently well-sourced, there is always this,
which I take from Bishop (then Father) Richard Williamson article which Roscoe cites above in their defense:
And here is a description of the Beatles in 1964 by a Derrick Taylor: "They're completely anti-Christ. I mean, I am anti-Christ as well, but they're so anti-Christ they shock me, which isn't an easy thing" (MM, p. 101).
Taylor was the Beatles' press officer, and there he was, as early as 1964 - before the "bigger than Jesus" controversy, before Sgt. Pepper, before the Hare Krishna nonsense, before "Imagine," back when the Beatles were merely "making happy sounds" as puff-puff-forget-to-pass Roscoe would have it - reporting that he, Taylor, a man who describes himself as "anti-Christ" is shocked by just how anti-Christ his employers the Beatles were at that time.
Roscoe, disingenuous (if not outright dishonest) as ever in the defense of his vices, takes one surgically removed sliver of a quotation from Bishop Williamson and rests his entire defense of the Beatles on it. Here is the quote in full, for anyone who's interested in things like context and meaning:
As for the other main elements in music - harmony and melody—certain rock artists are not lacking in talent. For example, the Beatles in some of their pieces show a true musical art. But rock in no way values these elements or this art, because they involve too much the superior and spiritual part of the soul. Thus, jazz has a melodic interest, but rock has none or only a little. What counts is the animal beat.
I'd encourage any and all interested to read the entire thing and see if you come away with the notion that Bishop Williamson is endorsing the Beatles in any way:
http://www.angelusonline.org/index.php?section=articles&subsection=show_article&article_id=1067 As anyone with an even nominally functioning Sensus Catholicus can tell you, it is the evil works of art which are technically and artistically well done which are the most dangerous of all. After all, which is the more deadly vehicle for arsenic: a plate of stale, moldy slop; or a magnificently prepared cake, beautifully decorated with an artist's touch?