Author Topic: A VISION OF BLESSED JOSEPH (Read 2880 times)

Jack in the Box · « **Reply #15 on:** September 15, 2012, 05:42:58 PM »

To Nadir. My answer does not make much sense to you, then you are blessed with innocence. I am convinced that we are at the End of Time, and that the telling of this vision that had occured a few years ago, and had been forgotten is significant now. The visionary spoke a few sober words as the exact telling of what was seen, and of what was made understandable. The salient point of the "Dust flying of the sandals" seems that heaven will cast evil upon the unbelievers, as The Lords in the Gospel told the disciples to shake-off the dust of their sandals while leaving a place that had not received them properly. This detail of the vision of dust flying-off St Joseph's sandals might have a significance of imminent chastisement upon the unbelievers.

I cannot say more of what is not from me.

Nadir · « **Reply #16 on:** September 17, 2012, 08:28:29 PM »

Quote from: Jack in the Box

To Nadir. My answer does not make much sense to you, then you are blessed with innocence.

I am a sinner. So you are saying I am innocent of what?

Quote from: Jack in the Box

I am convinced that we are at the End of Time, and that the telling of this vision that had occured a few years ago, and had been forgotten is significant now. The visionary spoke a few sober words as the exact telling of what was seen, and of what was made understandable. The salient point of the "Dust flying of the sandals" seems that heaven will cast evil upon the unbelievers, as The Lords in the Gospel told the disciples to shake-off the dust of their sandals while leaving a place that had not received them properly. This detail of the vision of dust flying-off St Joseph's sandals might have a significance of imminent chastisement upon the unbelievers.

I cannot say more of what is not from me.

This is your vision, isn't it? So why do you speak about yourself in the third person?

Do you by any chance involve yourself in Charismatic Renewal or have you in the past?

Jack in the Box · « **Reply #17 on:** September 18, 2012, 03:49:21 PM »

To Nadir: You are innocent because you are a believer. The shacking-off the sandals told in the Gospel is addressed against the unbelievers who do not recieve the disciples.

Have I been involved in a Charismatic movement? No! however, the person I attempt to occasionally speak-for went to a few sessions of the Mejugorges cult. This person rejected the Mejugorge cult almost immediately, and instead had a dreadful vision which was the total opposite of what was to be expected.

I am not a writer, and a poor communicator. This is a handicap to which I must cope with. Sorry, but no-one is around to write better. Not even a Priest!

Anthony Benedict · « **Reply #18 on:** September 18, 2012, 06:35:33 PM »

Dear "Jack":

I will accept, at face value, your expressions of sincerity. You are among a number of well-intended, deeply pietistic folks I've met over the years. Folks with all sorts of manifest emotionality, overflowing with sincerity. And, up to a certain point, that really can be commendable, within due limits.

I will also accept, at face value, that some good soul might be the recipient of a visit from the Great Beyond at any given moment - in theory.

So, yes, you or your friend or whomever might have "seen something." And that is very nice. If it actually happens to be a bona fide private revelation, that's very nice, too.

However, such matters are quite delicate, as I believe you will agree.

And, unfortunately, under the practices of the Church, not a one of us here, whether or not we think you are correct in your claim and your interpretation, can do one thing about it.

We cannot afirm it. We cannot deny it. We can, simply, do nothing that makes a wit of difference in the matter.

So, under the practices of the Church, if you wish to pursue the matter, you are in the position of actually needing to get qualified, official assistance. Only the local bishop has authority to investigate claims such as you make and to either promulgate them for private consideration as worthy of pious belief and in no way contradicting the teachings of the Church, or to ask any and all involved to simply drop the matter.

St. Paul himself did so. As did St. Joan of Arc. And St. Bernadette. And Bl. Jacinta and Bl. Francisco Marto of Fatima.

Jack in the Box · « **Reply #19 on:** September 19, 2012, 04:01:59 PM »

To Anthony Benedict:
I understand the term obediance, but who should we obey? Back in early January 1960,the Church has refused to reveal a secret given by the Mother of God . The Pope of the moment decided that the "secret" was not for our time. Our present Pope, while prefect of the CDF, climbed a podium besides Cardinal Bertone to "reveal" a forgery of this said above secret.

The "visionary" of my postings is known by the "clergy" and is simply ignored. The "clergy", and/or public authorities are also aware of events such as a tidlewave; a particular earthquake; some cyclones; some wild-fires; etc in which the "visionary" was unawarely involved. This "visionary" lives in hiding, because the total of those spelled above calamities amounts to many casualties.

Anthony Benedict, your verb is polite and very proper, but you no longer represent authority.

Jack.

Jack in the Box · « **Reply #20 on:** September 21, 2012, 02:19:30 PM »

UPDATE: From the visionary's diary, the vision of Blessed Joseph occured during the Summer 2010.

Anthony Benedict · « **Reply #21 on:** September 21, 2012, 02:37:03 PM »

Right. I'll cross-ref that with NASA for any UFO reports at that time.

Jack, I think you may be on the wrong spaceship. Check your baording pass.