I already banned Robert Rawhide/Nono/Bazz a bunch of times, but he doesn't seem to get the message.

Well, this time I'm not playing nice.

I deleted all 792 of his posts, as well as IP banned all the IPs he used to post here.

I've had it with him.

If he keeps it up I'll delete Robert Rawhide, Nono, and Bazz's posts as well.

Guess what, Robbie boy? You just wasted a LOT of your time. Poof! Into cyberspace.

I liked Cupertino and enjoyed his feisty attitude.  

But I do understand Matthew's enforcing the rules against members who are using multiple IP's and multiple prior bans.

It's a shame because Cupertino had a lot to offer.  He really should start his own blog and write essays on the crisis in the Catholic Church caused by the rupture of VCII.

I think it is a shame he was banned and I wonder what it was that triggered it!

I know he was not those usernames he is accused of and he only used his home computer or his work computer.  

So I believe there is a mistake here.

The truth is sometime; the truth that he spoke is hard on the ears, or in this case the eyes.  I see people breaking forum rules here all the time, but I have not seen him break any rules, just accused of them.  

There are many such posts here that should be removed, his were worthy of saving for non-catholics who lurk here, a valuable posting of Catholic teaching in these times of crisis.    

He might have been Nonno/Sheehan but I think Rawhide and Bazz were separate people.

I know he wasn't!

Quote from: MyrnaM

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

He might have been Nonno/Sheehan but I think Rawhide and Bazz were separate people.

I know he wasn't!

How do you know this? I am certain Robert Rawhide was RS. He was also known as J Lawrence Case in some circles. I thought Bazz was a few different posters, including RS.

I think Matthew invited RS back to the forum when he deleted the "ode" thread, so I don't see that as the sole reason for banning him again.

I've stated previously that the only thing I think everybody should know is that these multiple pseudonyms are really just one person. If he comes back, it should be under the same pseudonym, not yet another one.  

Frankly, its none of your business, how I know what I know.
I am not on trial!

I think Matthew invited RS back to the forum when he deleted the "ode" thread, so I don't see that as the sole reason for banning him again.

I've stated previously that the only thing I think everybody should know is that these multiple pseudonyms are really just one person. If he comes back, it should be under the same pseudonym, not yet another one.  

If Matthew were to invite someone back, he'd simply unban their account (like Raoul). If they return under a new name after being banned, it's a pretty good indication that they weren't invited, merely tolerated.

Quote from: SJB

I think Matthew invited RS back to the forum when he deleted the "ode" thread, so I don't see that as the sole reason for banning him again.

I've stated previously that the only thing I think everybody should know is that these multiple pseudonyms are really just one person. If he comes back, it should be under the same pseudonym, not yet another one.  

If Matthew were to invite someone back, he'd simply unban their account (like Raoul). If they return under a new name after being banned, it's a pretty good indication that they weren't invited, merely tolerated.

The below is what I was referring to, which appeared (to me at least) to be an invite to RS and others to return if they wished. He may have meant it differently than I interpreted it.

P.S. I'm not going to let this cost me hours of my productive work time AGAIN. Any criticism of CathInfo ITSELF or the moderator/owner will be met with IMMEDIATE BANS with NO WARNING. Consider THIS your warning. That goes for Skifast, Rob Sheehan, and everyone else who wishes to sign up and jump in. (As well as the existing membership here)

Discuss, argue all you want -- but you WILL leave me out of it, or you will be banned. Have a nice day.