I hope everyone can see I really didn't have a choice. I can't start each day by deleting 10+ posts where Croix de Fer is calling other members foul names. And I got sick of all the reports coming in to the moderator about him and his posts. 

I don't see what else you could have done, but I hope that the people who escalated the problem by calling him names reflect on their role in the situation.  Few, if any, of the people he called foul names had not also attacked him.  There were many posters saying some rather nasty things about him.  It is likely this was a factor in his unacceptable behaviour. 

Did he "jump the shark" or was he pushed over the edge?

I've gotten more downvotes in the last week, talking about feminism.  Apparently, people can't talk about it without getting triggered.  I'd say the same people who "complained to the moderator" about him were the one's calling him names.  His response just took things up a notch.  

Yeah, everybody says they are against feminism, but the pattern of downvotes suggests that there are some people who support it.  It isn't just posts with name-calling that get downvotes, but even perfectly polite condemnations of feminism.

Sometimes it's not about what you say but about how you say it.  There's an implicit undercurrent of misogyny in your posts to the effect of "most women are scuм and left to their own devices will be immoral and cheat".    Most MEN, my friend, end up falling into sin at college.  So it's a little imbalanced to single out women in that regard.  And that's where the downthumbs come from.  PS -- I haven't downthumbed you myself since the sedevacantists battles of a couple months ago.  I will not let my sons live on campus at college in the dorm rooms ... occasions of sin are everywhere on campus.  They'll be commuting to college ... to minimize that danger.

My anti-feminist posts were getting down-voted too, as were those of other women.  I think that this time it is about what we are saying, not how we say it.

For a marriage to be valid, do not both parties have to come to it without any mental reservations?  Does not a pre-nup indicate a mental reservation?   

  I am simply arguing that IF a woman loses her Faith and decides to divorce, then a prenup can help a man.  

Should a man assume this is a real possibility before he marries the young lady, why marry her at all?  Same goes for the young lady.  If she believes the man may leave her or beat her or cheat on her, etc, why take the risk?
.
The solution is not to take precautions on paper but to do the best you can to make a good choice before marriage, pray for each other a lot, and leave the rest to God.
.
He will take care of you if you do the best you can and trust in Him.

Should a man assume this is a real possibility before he marries the young lady, why marry her at all?  Same goes for the young lady.  If she believes the man may leave her or beat her or cheat on her, etc, why take the risk?
.
The solution is not to take precautions on paper but to do the best you can to make a good choice before marriage, pray for each other a lot, and leave the rest to God.
.
He will take care of you if you do the best you can and trust in Him.

Legal precautions can be circuмvented if the woman has lost all regard for the moral aspects of the act.  She can claim abuse for instance.  Ah, yes, the wicked husband severely spanked one of the children (this can be exaggerated).  Despite what Pax says, it doesn't have to be proven in a criminal court in order for the divorce judge to factor it in.  Women could have affairs without ever getting caught, etc.  As you say, the only true precaution is finding the right person.  And you don't go on how she presents herself while dating.  You look at her family, her upbringing, and signs of her being devout.  Look for women who, without being forced to by their parents, dress modestly and are devout beyond the mere requirements.  Look for women who attend weekday Mass or have a strong prayer life.  Then your odds of a stable marriage increase dramatically ... if you yourself have the same qualities.

And then, if despite all this, God wills to bring you the cross of an unfaithful wife, well then it's His will that we suffer those things for our sanctification.  We have the opportunity to turn the other cheek and become holy in our forgiveness of such a great offense.

Legal precautions can be circuмvented if the woman has lost all regard for the moral aspects of the act.  

Maybe partially, but not totally.  I'd rather have an agreement than not.
Your argument is one based on extremes.  "Well, the safety features of a car don't work 100% of the time, and even if you had airbags, and steel framing, anti-lock brakes and impact-resistant engineering, you could still die, so you might as well save $ and buy a crappy car because safety features are a waste."  Just because something isn't full-proof doesn't mean it's worthless.

Pax Vobis, 

Are you against marriage license too? I only ask because after much reading, and listening to everything most have to say here. I actually don’t think a prenup is a bad thing. I can see how it’s been stigmatized, but my only request would be that the man signed a marriage license so he can’t just ghost us and remarry.