Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Could the British Prime Minister be a Daily Rosary Saying, Tridentine Mass fan?  (Read 4284 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Last Tradhican

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6293
  • Reputation: +3327/-1937
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • You have zero basis for calling me a non-Catholic

    Quote
    Banezian wrote: - I would absolutely marry a Traditional Orthodox or a Traditional Protestant(Anglican/Lutheran) before I thought about marrying an N. O Catholic. - I’m closer to traditional Orth9dox than I am to any Novus Ordo.

    Novus Ordo's are Catholic, while Anglicans, Lutherans, Eastern Orthodox are heretics and schismatics. You are not Catholic and your every word further confirms it. Keep writing, you may just convince yourself of what I am pointing out to you.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Novus Ordo's are Catholic, while Anglicans, Lutherans, Eastern Orthodox are heretics and schismatics. You are not Catholic and your every word further confirms it. Keep writing, you may just convince yourself of what I am pointing out to you.

    Yes, this further confirms that Banezian isn't even Catholic.  He also clearly rejects EENS.  How can you be closer to an explicit professed schismatic and/or heretic than to a conservative Novus Ordo type who professes the faith but happens to have adhered materially to some error (yes, I know that many individuals within the Novus Ordo are heretics, but I wasn't referring to these in my post)?

    There's only one answer.  Banezian is a smells-and-bells guy.  Because the Orthodox or traddy Anglican types have better smells and bells than the Novus Ordo, Banezian considers them closer to Catholicism.  Unbelievable.  Someone who formally holds the Catholic faith but has a liking for clown Masses is much closer to Catholicism than a formal heretic/schismatic.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • There are various schools of thought when it comes to EENS( Fenton, Garrigou, Muller, etc) Who are you to call people non-Catholics when the Church has said no such thing?

    Schools of thought which did not come into existence until the first Jesuit liberals started playing with the notion of EENS around the year 1600.  And the Church's failure to condemn these types does not condone their heresies.  God allowed the Church not to condemn these errors, because without them the great testing of faith that we see in progress today could never have happened.  God willed that the faith be put to the test.  And you are failing badly, Banezian.

    Are you a Traditional Catholic at all?  If so, you're in contradiction because everything in Vatican II derives from this Garrigou-articulated distortion of EENS.

    I guess that Arianism wasn't heresy until it was formally condemned by the Church after some time.  Until the Church formally and officially condemned it, it too was just a harmless "school of thought".

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • There's only one answer.  Banezian is a smells-and-bells guy.  Because the Orthodox or traddy Anglican types have better smells and bells than the Novus Ordo, Banezian considers them closer to Catholicism.  Unbelievable.  Someone who formally holds the Catholic faith but has a liking for clown Masses is much closer to Catholicism than a formal heretic/schismatic.
    St. Peter Julian Eymard – Bad Catholic vs Good Protestant

    People often say, “It is better to be a good Protestant than a bad Catholic.” That is not true! That would mean that one could be saved without the true faith. No. A bad Catholic remains a child of the family, although a prodigal; and however great a sinner he may be, he still has a right to mercy. Through his faith, a bad Catholic is nearer to God than a Protestant, for he is a member of the household, whereas the heretic is not. And how hard it is to make him become one!
    St. Peter Julian Eymard
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • St. Peter Julian Eymard – Bad Catholic vs Good Protestant

    People often say, “It is better to be a good Protestant than a bad Catholic.” That is not true! That would mean that one could be saved without the true faith. No. A bad Catholic remains a child of the family, although a prodigal; and however great a sinner he may be, he still has a right to mercy. Through his faith, a bad Catholic is nearer to God than a Protestant, for he is a member of the household, whereas the heretic is not. And how hard it is to make him become one!
    St. Peter Julian Eymard

    Yes, this emphasis on the superficial over substance is emotional and not intellectual ... and, therefore, exceedingly effeminate.


    Offline trad123

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2042
    • Reputation: +448/-96
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You claim I don’t know the Catholic Faith. This is probably because of my position on BOD. I follow Garrigou-Lagrange on this point, and I’ll take his position over the views of Cathinfo armchair theologians any day

    This isn't even about BoD, this is about the necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation.
    2 Corinthians 4:3-4 

    And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost, In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.

    Offline Banezian

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +166/-821
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Novus Ordo's are Catholic, while Anglicans, Lutherans, Eastern Orthodox are heretics and schismatics. You are not Catholic and your every word further confirms it. Keep writing, you may just convince yourself of what I am pointing out to you.
    I’ll take a good Orthodox or Anglo-Catholic over a JPII worshipping Novus Ordo any day.
    "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."
    Ephesians 2:8-9

    Offline Banezian

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +166/-821
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • This isn't even about BoD, this is about the necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation.
    Of course the Faith is necessary for salvation. Anyone who is saved is saved a Catholic. 
    "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."
    Ephesians 2:8-9


    Offline Banezian

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +166/-821
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Yes, this further confirms that Banezian isn't even Catholic.  He also clearly rejects EENS.  How can you be closer to an explicit professed schismatic and/or heretic than to a conservative Novus Ordo type who professes the faith but happens to have adhered materially to some error (yes, I know that many individuals within the Novus Ordo are heretics, but I wasn't referring to these in my post)?

    There's only one answer.  Banezian is a smells-and-bells guy.  Because the Orthodox or traddy Anglican types have better smells and bells than the Novus Ordo, Banezian considers them closer to Catholicism.  Unbelievable.  Someone who formally holds the Catholic faith but has a liking for clown Masses is much closer to Catholicism than a formal heretic/schismatic.
    It’s not a matter of smells and bells. Traditional Orthodox and Anglo-Catholic theology is closer to Traditional Catholic theology than what the Novus Ordo teaches. That’s a fact
    "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."
    Ephesians 2:8-9

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2940
    • Reputation: +1090/-2220
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I have a feeling this will devolve rather quickly. I apologize for anyone who wanted discussion on British politics. :facepalm:
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...

    Offline Banezian

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +166/-821
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Schools of thought which did not come into existence until the first Jesuit liberals started playing with the notion of EENS around the year 1600.  And the Church's failure to condemn these types does not condone their heresies.  God allowed the Church not to condemn these errors, because without them the great testing of faith that we see in progress today could never have happened.  God willed that the faith be put to the test.  And you are failing badly, Banezian.

    Are you a Traditional Catholic at all?  If so, you're in contradiction because everything in Vatican II derives from this Garrigou-articulated distortion of EENS.

    I guess that Arianism wasn't heresy until it was formally condemned by the Church after some time.  Until the Church formally and officially condemned it, it too was just a harmless "school of thought".
    ABL agreed with me. If I’m a heretic, so was he.
    Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, Against the Heresies, Page 216: “Evidently, certain distinctions must be made.  Souls can be saved in a religion other than the Catholic religion (Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism, etc.), but not by this religion.  There may be souls who, not knowing Our Lord, have by the grace of the good Lord, good interior dispositions, who submit to God…But some of these persons make an act of love which implicitly is equivalent to baptism of desire.  It is uniquely by this means that they are able to be saved.”
    Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, Against the Heresies, Page 217: “One cannot say, then, that no one is saved in these religions…”
    Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, Open Letter to Confused Catholics, Pages 73-74: “Does this mean that no Protestant, no Muslim, no Buddhist or animist will be saved?  No, it would be a second error to think that.  Those who cry for intolerance in interpreting St. Cyprian’s formula Outside the Church there is no salvation, also reject the Creed, “I accept one baptism for the remission of sins,” and are insufficiently instructed as to what baptism is…”
    Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, Against the Heresies, Pages 217-218: “This is then what Pius IX said and what he condemned.  It is necessary to understand the formulation that was so often employed by the Fathers of the Church:  ‘Outside the Church there is no salvation.’  When we say that, it is incorrectly believed that we think that all the Protestants, all the Moslems, all the Buddhists, all those who do not publicly belong to the Catholic Church go to hell.  Now, I repeat, it is possible for someone to be saved in these religions, but they are saved by the Church, and so the formulation is true: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.  This must be preached.”
    "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."
    Ephesians 2:8-9


    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2449
    • Reputation: +964/-1098
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quoting Abp. Lefebvre is interesting, because most people on this site are willing to call anyone a non-Catholic heretic for saying things like that EXCEPT him. When you point out the hypocrisy they just accuse you of being some divide-and-conquer troll. 

    Offline Banezian

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +166/-821
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quoting Abp. Lefebvre is interesting, because most people on this site are willing to call anyone a non-Catholic heretic for saying things like that EXCEPT him. When you point out the hypocrisy they just accuse you of being some divide-and-conquer troll.
    Indeed
    "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."
    Ephesians 2:8-9

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • ABL agreed with me. If I’m a heretic, so was he.
    I was one of the first contributors to CI that introduced those ABL quotes that the writer posted. He again makes the same mistake by saying that he "follows" ABL that he did  when he said he is just "following" Garrigou-Lagrange, he is just choosing them because they reflect what he already believed, what 99% of Novus Ordo's believe and Vatican II and JPII taught, along with all the Vatican II clergy. That is why Vatican II came to be, to teach what he believes, what was demonstrated at the World Day of Peace at Assisi, that non-Catholics can be saved by their belief in a God that rewards. I'll repeat what I said, the writer quotes 20th century personages because there are no saints that ever taught what he believes. My belief in EENS is based on dogmas as they are written, and the early church Fathers and many many saints. The writers belief is based on 20th century personages, what he was taught by the Vatican II religion.

    BY the way, like I pointed out, I said the writer is not Catholic because of what he wrote, which has nothing to do with EENS, he said that "I would absolutely marry a Traditional Orthodox or a Traditional Protestant(Anglican/Lutheran) before I thought about marrying an N. O Catholic. - I’m closer to traditional Orth9dox than I am to any Novus Ordo".



    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quoting Abp. Lefebvre is interesting, because most people on this site are willing to call anyone a non-Catholic heretic for saying things like that EXCEPT him. When you point out the hypocrisy they just accuse you of being some divide-and-conquer troll.

    Nope.  I've stated clearly that the particular quotes from +Lefebvre are indeed objectively heretical.  He wrongly believes that he's upholding "no salvation outside the Church" by reformulating it as "no salvation except by means of the Church."  But it's clear that +Lefebvre never gave the question much thought and was merely parroting back something he was taught in seminary.

    Banezian on the other hand manifested his heresy by declaring that formal schismatics and heretics are closer to Catholicism than conservative Novus Ordites who profess the Catholic faith.  And he is pertinacious in this heresy after having been called out and corrected about it.