CathInfo.com

What does it mean to be a "traditional Christian" vs. a "traditional Catholic"?  There's no such thing as a traditional Christian except for a Traditional Catholic.

If you can't find a Traditional Catholic spouse, then at least go with a conservative Novus Ordo type who still has the faith and believes the same core things as what the Church teaches on faith and morals.  There's much less a divide there.  At least you both profess the Catholic faith ... vs. marrying a heretic.

Not that this man is a Traditional Catholic.  Surely he could have found a conservative Novus Ordo wife.  But she is worth lots of money and seems to have ties with nobility.

When I speak of a “traditional Christian” I mean a woman who is culturally traditional and believes what all Christians have believed throughou the ages. “Conservative” Novus Ordo women worship JPII. They’ll tell you that one doesn’t need to believe in Christ to be saved and that we worship the same God as Jews ( thry think the Old Covenant is still valid) Thry call themselves “JPII Feminists” They don’t dress or act like women. 100 years ago, these women would not have been accepted in any Christian circles( let alone Catholic) No decent/pious Orthodox or Anglican/Lutheran(and I mean the most traditional among them ) is like that. They do not worship the Jews nor will they say one can be saved without Christ. Certainly even traditional Protestants are in grave error on several points, but I’m closer to traditional Orth9dox than I am to any Novus Ordo. Outside of papal primacy, Traditional Orthodox don’t disagree with us on much anything substantial  ( when one really gets into the technical aspects of theological questions)

Married to an anglican in Canterbury Cathedral means married outside the Church. Whether or not what you claim above is true, you are giving a lot away about yourself which would point in the direction of ignorance of the mind of the Church.
That you don't see anything wrong with that (marrying a heretic in the Anglican church) shows you have a poor knowledge of the Catholic Faith.

Did you bother to read my last post? I said I DO NOT approve of him marrying in Canterbury Cathedral. That was wrong.  As I have also said, mixed marriages are not ideal but they must be accepted in the modern world. Please, read what I write before attacking me

When I speak of a “traditional Christian” I mean a woman who is culturally traditional and believes what all Christians have believed throughou the ages. “Conservative” Novus Ordo women worship JPII. They’ll tell you that one doesn’t need to believe in Christ to be saved and that we worship the same God as Jews ( thry think the Old Covenant is still valid) Thry call themselves “JPII Feminists” They don’t dress or act like women. 100 years ago, these women would not have been accepted in any Christian circles( let alone Catholic) No decent/pious Orthodox or Anglican/Lutheran(and I mean the most traditional among them ) is like that. They do not worship the Jews nor will they say one can be saved without Christ. Certainly even traditional Protestants are in grave error on several points, but I’m closer to traditional Orth9dox than I am to any Novus Ordo. Outside of papal primacy, Traditional Orthodox don’t disagree with us on much anything substantial  ( when one really gets into the technical aspects of theological questions)

Here is your last post. Nothing there about said non-approval.
.
Also you need to brush up on "Orthodoxy".
.
Do you cosider the Immaculate Conception something substantial?
How about Purgatory? Original sin? The Filioque? The indissolubility of marriage? The Church councils?