Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7

Author Topic: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning  (Read 9072 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline josefamenendez

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5428
  • Reputation: +4085/-280
  • Gender: Female
Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
« Reply #60 on: January 08, 2020, 07:53:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Poche is fishing for souls with poison zio-Novus Ordo bait. In otherwords, souls  swayed by Poche's "cutsie"  false piety will be severely damaged and steered away from the truth.( Is that the goal, Poche?)There are dozens of quasi-"Trad" Indult type websites he would fit right into, and yet, even after being hounded into a corner, he has no defense, continues to obfuscate, and insists on hanging around. What is his MO? Dinner? No- He's much more important to his handlers than that.
     Think about it, then think why it is so important that he be banned. Souls come here seeking the whole Truth, and even if there are arguments within, they are sincere, real and intellectually sound. People see that. Cathinfo is an oasis for us and a window of true Catholicism for the visitor.
    Poche being marginalized is not good enough- he'll slither out eventually.
    Thank goodness the true Traditional Church and (Cathinfo) is NOT a democracy. Souls are too precious to tolerate intentional error and sly manipulations. To me, Poche is a psy-ops. I won't  be naive enough to think these things don't happen. We are drowning in them everyday and TPTB are counting on us being numbed and blinded by their sheer volume so we can no longer identify them. 

    Poche, we see you.


    Logged

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 11953
    • Reputation: +7514/-2253
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #61 on: January 08, 2020, 08:51:02 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Poche, you just continue to lie and/or make misleading comments.  You have no integrity.
    .

    Quote
    I went to confession this morning and the priest gave me absolution.
    https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681110/#msg681110
    .
    Then you just said:
    Quote
    I don't discuss what I said in confession.
    Logged

    Offline Bonaventure

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1310
    • Reputation: +844/-274
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #62 on: January 08, 2020, 09:23:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Pax Vobis on January 08, 2020, 08:51:02 AM
    Poche, you just continue to lie and/or make misleading comments.  You have no integrity.


    Mais oui.
    Logged

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6789
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #63 on: January 08, 2020, 02:59:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
    • Quote from: poche on January 07, 2020, 11:04:01 PM
    I am sorry but I am not familiar with the тαℓмυd. I prefer to study the Sacred Scripture and the Catechism the study of the тαℓмυd.  

    And why would anyone want to study the тαℓмυd, unless they are Jєωιѕн. I certainly don't have any interest in it.
    Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46042
    • Reputation: +27112/-5009
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #64 on: January 08, 2020, 03:11:22 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: josefamenendez on January 08, 2020, 07:53:25 AM
    Poche is fishing for souls with poison zio-Novus Ordo bait. In otherwords, souls  swayed by Poche's "cutsie"  false piety will be severely damaged and steered away from the truth.( Is that the goal, Poche?)

    poche refused to answer my question about what his intentions are here, for being so active (4th in terms of total posts in CI history) on a forum on which absolutely no one agrees with him.  So we can only assume that it's either something nefarious or else he's just trolling.  Or we could entertain some conspiracy theories, that he's actually a Traditional Catholic deliberately playing the part of a Novus Ordo devil's advocate, or else he's actually Matthew  :laugh1:.

    Lover of Truth used to post tirelessly against Feeneyism, and that was because he had almost become a Feeneyite and therefore has some psychological need to comat this "pernicious heresy" that ALMOST took him down.  So perhaps poche too has had some personal run-in with Traditional Catholics.  No one knows, since he refuses to come clean.  I strongly believe that, if he doesn't explain himself, he should be banned.  He's wasting a lot of people's time on this forum.  While once could advise just to ignore him, he keeps posting Novus Ordo and Bergoglio propaganda that many posters feel the need to combat.
    Logged

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12448
    • Reputation: +8247/-1568
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #65 on: January 08, 2020, 03:22:33 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Meg on January 08, 2020, 02:59:02 PM
    And why would anyone want to study the тαℓмυd, unless they are Jєωιѕн. I certainly don't have any interest in it.
    Quintessential Meg, misses the obvious.… again.

    The Jews are the most organized earthly opposition to Jesus Christ, His Church, His Law, and His People.

    Whether to convert them or oppose them, a thinking person wants to understand what God's enemies believe.

    But then there are some people who operate almost exclusively at sub-cortical/amygdaloid levels.
    Logged

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6789
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #66 on: January 08, 2020, 03:30:06 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!3
    • Quote from: Mark 79 on January 08, 2020, 03:22:33 PM
    Quintessential Meg, misses the obvious.… again.
    The Jews are the most organized earthly opposition to Jesus Christ, His Church, His Law, and His People.
    Whether to convert them or oppose them, a thinking person wants to understand what God's enemies believe.
    But then there are some people who operate almost exclusively at sub-cortical amygdaloid.

    What the heck does sub-cortical amygdaloid mean, in English? You are obviously trying to show off for your adoring fans here.

    I'm pretty sure that we Catholics aren't supposed to read that тαℓмυdic crap. But you don't seem to mind at all.
    Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12448
    • Reputation: +8247/-1568
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #67 on: January 08, 2020, 03:33:20 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Meg on January 08, 2020, 03:30:06 PM
    What the heck does sub-cortical amygdaloid mean, in English? You are obviously trying to show off for your adoring fans here.

    It means you are slightly more functional than brain dead.

    Quote from: Meg on January 08, 2020, 03:30:06 PM
    I'm pretty sure that we Catholics aren't supposed to read that тαℓмυdic crap. But you don't seem to mind at all.

    Once again you are "pretty sure,"  but wrong.
    Logged

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6789
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #68 on: January 08, 2020, 03:55:07 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!4
    • Quote from: Mark 79 on January 08, 2020, 03:33:20 PM
    It means you are slightly more functional than brain dead.

    Once again you are "pretty sure,"  but wrong.

    Are you by any chance a convert from Judaism? Because if so, it would explain a few things.
    Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12448
    • Reputation: +8247/-1568
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #69 on: January 08, 2020, 04:26:08 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
    • The thread is about Poochie, not me, not you. Besides, your brain is over-heating.
    Logged

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 9227
    • Reputation: +9064/-870
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #70 on: January 08, 2020, 07:47:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: poche on January 07, 2020, 11:04:01 PM
    I am sorry but I am not familiar with the тαℓмυd. I prefer to study the Sacred Scripture and the Catechism the study of the тαℓмυd.  

    How did you choose he name "Poche"?
    Logged
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7665
    • Reputation: +643/-417
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #71 on: January 08, 2020, 08:52:17 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Meg on January 08, 2020, 03:30:06 PM
    What the heck does sub-cortical amygdaloid mean, in English? You are obviously trying to show off for your adoring fans here.

    I'm pretty sure that we Catholics aren't supposed to read that тαℓмυdic crap. But you don't seem to mind at all.
    This is correct Meg as the тαℓмυd is certainly on the Index for the layman & i would imagine most of the Clergy. Exceptions are made for certain qualified theologians who need to prepare for a disputation or whatever. There have been debates w/ тαℓмυdic 'scholars' in the past... :popcorn:
    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12448
    • Reputation: +8247/-1568
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #72 on: January 08, 2020, 10:26:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: roscoe on January 08, 2020, 08:52:17 PM
    This is correct Meg as the тαℓмυd is certainly on the Index for the layman & i would imagine most of the Clergy. Exceptions are made for certain qualified theologians who need to prepare for a disputation or whatever. There have been debates w/ тαℓмυdic 'scholars' in the past... :popcorn:
    "Certainly"? "Imagine"? Really?

    Which Index? Tridentine? or Pauline?

    Which edition/year of the ever-changing indices?

    If forbidden, why did Pope Leo X commission publication of one of the most ornate тαℓмυd editions ever?

    Sorry, Roscoe, I'd need a reliable reference substantiating that during the papacy of Pope Pius XII, the last true Pope, the тαℓмυd was listed on the Index.

    For decades I have periodically researched тαℓмυd tractates and related commentary. I have never found even an unreferenced or vague statement that the тαℓмυd was on the Index. It may have been so at one time, but I need a verifiable reference, not supposition, that the тαℓмυd remained on the Index during the most recent valid papacy.

    I wonder if the non-sedevacantist harpy herself understands that her "valid" Pope Pius VI eliminated the Index.

    In fact, Meg's "valid" Pope Bergoglio's official newspaper recommended DAILY тαℓмυd study, a recommendation that was not restricted to "qualified theologians" or "clergy":

    L’Osservatore Romano recommends Daf Yomi (Daily тαℓмυd Lessons)
    http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2018/06/losservatore-romano-reccomends-daf-yomi.html




    scroll to page 6:
    L’Osservatore Romano, Anno CLIII n. 96 (46.340), venerdì 26 aprile 2013, Il тαℓмυd giorno per giorno, pagina 6.




    Logged

    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16730
    • Reputation: +1220/-4690
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #73 on: January 08, 2020, 10:33:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on January 08, 2020, 03:11:22 PM
    poche refused to answer my question about what his intentions are here, for being so active (4th in terms of total posts in CI history) on a forum on which absolutely no one agrees with him.  So we can only assume that it's either something nefarious or else he's just trolling.  Or we could entertain some conspiracy theories, that he's actually a Traditional Catholic deliberately playing the part of a Novus Ordo devil's advocate, or else he's actually Matthew  :laugh1:.

    Lover of Truth used to post tirelessly against Feeneyism, and that was because he had almost become a Feeneyite and therefore has some psychological need to comat this "pernicious heresy" that ALMOST took him down.  So perhaps poche too has had some personal run-in with Traditional Catholics.  No one knows, since he refuses to come clean.  I strongly believe that, if he doesn't explain himself, he should be banned.  He's wasting a lot of people's time on this forum.  While once could advise just to ignore him, he keeps posting Novus Ordo and Bergoglio propaganda that many posters feel the need to combat.
    I am interested in an exchange of ideas.
    Logged

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12448
    • Reputation: +8247/-1568
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
    « Reply #74 on: January 08, 2020, 10:37:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: poche on January 08, 2020, 10:33:32 PM
    I am interested in an exchange of ideas.
    Ideas like the Blessed Mother was prefigured by a demon's star?
    "Greater ideas" that require falsifying scripture?
    Ideas like stacking lies upon lies?
    Ideas condemned by the Magisterium?
    We need no such "ideas."
    Leave and take your channeled demons with you.


    Logged
    Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7
    « previous next »