This is correct Meg as the тαℓмυd is certainly on the Index for the layman & i would imagine most of the Clergy. Exceptions are made for certain qualified theologians who need to prepare for a disputation or whatever. There have been debates w/ тαℓмυdic 'scholars' in the past... 
"Certainly"? "Imagine"? Really?
Which Index? Tridentine? or Pauline?
Which edition/year of the ever-changing indices?
If forbidden, why did Pope Leo X commission publication of one of the most ornate тαℓмυd editions ever?
Sorry, Roscoe, I'd need a reliable reference substantiating that during the papacy of Pope Pius XII, the last true Pope, the тαℓмυd was listed on the Index.
For decades I have periodically researched тαℓмυd tractates and related commentary. I have never found even an unreferenced or vague statement that the тαℓмυd was on the Index. It may have been so at one time, but I need a verifiable reference, not supposition, that the тαℓмυd remained on the Index during the most recent valid papacy.
I wonder if the non-sedevacantist harpy herself understands that her "valid" Pope Pius VI eliminated the Index.
In fact, Meg's "valid" Pope Bergoglio's official newspaper recommended DAILY тαℓмυd study, a recommendation that was not restricted to "qualified theologians" or "clergy":
L’Osservatore Romano recommends Daf Yomi (Daily тαℓмυd Lessons)http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2018/06/losservatore-romano-reccomends-daf-yomi.htmlscroll to page 6:
L’Osservatore Romano, Anno CLIII n. 96 (46.340), venerdì 26 aprile 2013, Il тαℓмυd giorno per giorno, pagina 6.
Topic: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning (Read 18168 times)