Author Topic: Catholic Answers "TIme-til-banned" record. (Read 2973 times)

Gregory I · « **on:** September 07, 2011, 01:05:00 AM »

So, who has managed to go to Catholic Answers and last the longest without changing their position? What is the longest, or shortest amount of time you were able to spend before being threatened and banned by the liberals?

Just curious:

I made a thread on Pseudo-Traditionalism that made it almost a week! Then the whole thing was deleted when I said that Heretical Modernists hijacked the Liturgical movement, which caused the REAL corruptions in the "mess" of Paul VI.

Gotta love Thomas Casey...

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #1 on:** September 07, 2011, 09:04:15 AM »

My position did change after posting on CAF, but for the better. I had only been a Traditional Catholic for a few months when I signed up there so my views were still forming, and after seeing the views of all the libs there my views became more Traditional.

I was only there for about a month and a half. I joined April 2, 2010 and was banned on May 20th. What happened was, I made a negative comment about Vatican II (it actually wasn't my first negative comment) and several days afterwards I got a PM from a moderator there named Eric Hilbert saying I had been given an infraction for the comment. I PMed him back, and all I did was kindly ask him why I was given an infraction and what the consequences of one were. So on a thread that only mods were allowed to post on (a rules thread) he made a post on there that afternoon saying not to PM him after an infraction saying "Hey, I can't say anything contrary to Catholicism" or something to that affect. I knew he was talking about me. 30 minutes later I was banned for "refusal to follow moderator directions". So basically he made up a lame excuse to ban me. I think all the mods over there do that, they lie and make up excuses to ban Traditionalists.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #2 on:** September 07, 2011, 03:02:23 PM »

Ahh yes. The always logical Mr. Thomas Casey! :rolleyes:

I am amazingly still not banned, though I've been censured into oblivion.

Admittedly, I don't post there much.

I never changed my position.

BroMo (Short for Brother Modernist) as I affectionately call "JREducation" is the resident King who's views cannot be criticized too harshly. He slavishly uses the whip of "obedience" to try to beat Trads into submission. He's all about the rules, rules, rules of the NO Church, which are ambiguous and never enforced anyway. He has apparently never meditated on the words of Our Lord, "The letter killeth".

In his mind the Society should be avoided like the plague since they have no mission from the Church, yet Catholics should feel free to assist at their weekly rock Mass if the parish is juridically a-ok. He (and almost all the other Neo-Caths on there) are legalists extrordinaire. They are technicians who will reduce everything to blind obedience.

Charles · « **Reply #3 on:** September 07, 2011, 07:02:42 PM »

Who are the ones fighting the good fight there ?

Rosary Crusader seems to stand out as a good one.

Charles · « **Reply #4 on:** September 07, 2011, 07:22:01 PM »

Quote from: Gregory I

So, who has managed to go to Catholic Answers and last the longest without changing their position? What is the longest, or shortest amount of time you were able to spend before being threatened and banned by the liberals?

Just curious:

I made a thread on Pseudo-Traditionalism that made it almost a week! Then the whole thing was deleted when I said that Heretical Modernists hijacked the Liturgical movement, which caused the REAL corruptions in the "mess" of Paul VI.

Gotta love Thomas Casey...

You banned or was the thread removal the only action he took ?

Gregory I · « **Reply #5 on:** September 07, 2011, 07:47:25 PM »

I have not been banned yet, because I go there only infrequently to give a little diatribe or two about the hijacking of the Liturgical Movement by modernists. That gets shot down pretty fast usually.

Like I said elsewhere, i once got 55 pages into a thread on Limbo that resulted in many women crying and berating me for my cruelty, which I count as a rampant success.

One of my aliases has about 3 infractions, the other has about 10. I have gotten Thomas Casey to reverse an infraction. He tried to give me one for referring to protestants as material heretics, I told HIm it was a theologically accurate term, read the baltimore Catechism. He retracted it, but asked me to refrain from "name calling."

I laughed.

Gregory I · « **Reply #6 on:** September 07, 2011, 07:49:31 PM »

Amongst those I count as friends there, I would list Pro Vobis, Rosary Crusader, Shin, and SouthPawLink is alright.

Daegus · « **Reply #7 on:** September 07, 2011, 08:00:03 PM »

"Catholic" Answers Forum is not a Catholic forum. There are very few, if any, Catholics posting there. Most of the people there are heretics or apostates in one way or another.

I was permanently banned on 2 accounts for saying that Judaism is a false religion and saying that it is of the Devil. These people still believe that the Old Covenant is valid and in place. They don't believe in Catholic dogma that there is no salvation outside the Church. The martyrs don't mean anything to them. They're frauds. They're definitely not Catholics.

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #8 on:** September 07, 2011, 08:08:39 PM »

Quote from: Gregory I

I have gotten Thomas Casey to reverse an infraction. He tried to give me one for referring to protestants as material heretics, I told HIm it was a theologically accurate term, read the baltimore Catechism. He retracted it, but asked me to refrain from "name calling."

I laughed.

That, dear sir, is AWESOME.

This reminds me of a story.

When I was a young lady in high school, I had a Northern Irish priest teaching me "New Testament Scripture." Every Wednesday, I would go over to the "indult" parish I used to go to before I found the "nuts on the hill" (ironically, their church is on a steeper hill than ours is

... anyway...), and we were taught the Baltimore Catechism. There was one thing that really stuck out one class I went to, and I brought my newly obtained knowledge to class with me. Here's what I learned:

Quote from: The Baltimore Catechism #3

Q. 1171. Will the denial of only one article of faith make a person a heretic?

A. The denial of only one article of faith will make a person a heretic and guilty of mortal sin, because the Holy Scripture says: "Whosoever shall keep the whole law but offend in one point is become guilty of all."

I got into a "discussion"

with a novus ordo Catholic about this. She said she believed in abortion, and I quoted the above, and she said she was still Catholic, and there was a "No you aren't!" "Yes I am!" :argue: going on. And so I turned to Father, and I said, "Right, Father. You have to believe everything the Church teaches or you're not a Catholic?" and he replied, "No, that's not true." I said, "Well, then, you're a heretic!" and I'm telling you, his face got beat red like a tomato, and he said, "I'd like to see you after class."

Longest. Hour. Of my life. Everyone leaves, and he slams the door, and said, "If you ever call me that again, I'll have you expelled."

After I went down to the guidance office, to call my mother, he came down, and told my mother he was, "teaching religion as a subject."

:stare:

Really? Then why are people paying thousands of dollars to send their children to a Catholic school? Huh...

:stare:

Oh well, just wanted to share that with you.

I bet that priest still remembers me calling him a heretic. I wonder if he thinks about it much.

:pop:

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #9 on:** September 07, 2011, 08:11:43 PM »

Quote from: Gregory I

Like I said elsewhere, i once got 55 pages into a thread on Limbo that resulted in many women crying and berating me for my cruelty, which I count as a rampant success.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #10 on:** September 07, 2011, 08:12:55 PM »

I believe Tele has the record for fastest ban there. I think it was one day, 3 posts. He quoted a pope. Banned.

Gregory I · « **Reply #11 on:** September 07, 2011, 08:57:38 PM »

I think Catholic Answers is awesome in this sense: where else can you go to see the heresies of new church and get a pulse of the novus ordo population at large?

It's really funny to become immersed in trad culture, go back, then read some topics some "right-wing-liberals" (read CONSERVATIVE NO'ers) post, and just think to yourself- "What the heck is he talking about? He just posited , like, 5 heretical opinions, and he only used 5 words!"

I agree, JREducation is ridiculous. I have tried to reason with that man, but he posts responses even longer than MINE, and goes ON and ON about "obedience!" He means willful ignorance of course, but still...

Frustrating.

Blech.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #12 on:** September 07, 2011, 08:58:32 PM »

I think the record actually goes to some person there who was a sede and supporter of the Dimond Brothers. He was there for like one day, made two posts. Posted the link to the Dimond Brothers' web-site, and was banned.

That's pretty low that Tele was banned for quoting a Pope. Daegus is right, that place isn't really Catholic.

Daegus · « **Reply #13 on:** September 07, 2011, 09:01:17 PM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

I believe Tele has the record for fastest ban there. I think it was one day, 3 posts. He quoted a pope. Banned.

I made one post criticizing the book "Catholicism for Dummies" to expose its heresies. Do you want to know what happened to me? I was banned within 30 minutes. I only made one post after the topic post. They figured out my ban on Daegus was being circuмvented so they banned me again, but I just made another account.

The people on the family life section are IMPOSSIBLE. 99% of them are women, NO'ers and are absolutely faithless. It's no wonder that the vast majority (a bit of an exaggeration, but there are a LOT of these topics) of the topics over there make topics about how their marriages are failing and how they're getting a divorce or are involved in one.

Do you see the Catholic ladies of Cathinfo doing that? No. They know what a marriage is supposed to be built upon. They don't have issues with their fathers/or whatever that they can't handle, etc.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #14 on:** September 07, 2011, 09:01:45 PM »

While we're speaking of members at CAF, there was one who thought "the noises of happy children during Mass" was reverent. After I told him that wasn't considered reverent he got all freaked out. Another member there said it wasn't true that there was no salvation outside the Catholic Church.