Continuing from my last post, three points :
First, the US has nothing to offer Christendom. It seems that the unique role of les Américains has been to be the warehouse of resources and factory of mass production and delivery of the rotten Anglo-Judaic disculture. Built upon such inauspicious foundations, it was granted, by way of Divine wrath, all of the material advantages and inventions and engineers and propagandists to expand its dark empire over all the children of men; with all of these advantages, it accomplished nothing but the maximum of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for divine vengeance, as well as the maximum corruption of the innocence of children and the chastity of women. Purposely being founded as an exception to the legacy of Catholic and Roman Europe, it has nothing to restore. As soon as it fulfills its purpose, therefore, I believe God will discard it in His justice, since iniquity lies to itself.
Second and third, Charles Maurrass and the reign of le Grand Monarque. As for Charles Maurrass, his was not a deathbed conversion; he practiced the Faith for ten years before he died. Nevertheless, he was an orléaniste and semi-fascist nationalist, so his later conversion does not retroactively validate his works. Saint Pius X's compliment was merely that Maurrass upheld "hierarchy, order, and obedience," as opposed to the satanic trinity of the revolutionary motto. As for the Monarch, I don't believe the prophecies that say his reign will be short. They are contradicted by other prophecies and, besides, it would be inconsistent with a good ruler. If religion triumphs and there are many holy Doctors and saintly, wise men on earth, how could they raise a succeeding generation that is wicked. Moral theology tells us that parents share the guilt for every sin of their children which they could have in ay way prevented; thus, saintly parents will most likely have ecent children, uprooting wicked tendencies and faults from infancy. And the Church's sacramental power needs to ...