Capistrano admitted to being banned here before -- now I know why.

I visited his website, which turned my stomach.

First, here is his sigline, describing his hero namesake:

When Capistrano arrived at Breslau, a report was circulated that a certain wealthy Jєω named Meyer had bought a host from a peasant and desecrated it. The local authorities used this as a pretext to arrest the representatives of the Jєωιѕн community and confiscate their houses and property for the benefit of the city. The investigation of the blasphemy was conducted by Capistrano himself. Like many other inquisitors, he used torture to force confessions and more than 40 Jєωs were burned at the stake in Breslau June 2, 1453. Others, fearing torture, committed ѕυιcιdє. A rabbi by the name of Pinheas hanged himself. The remainder of the Jєωs were driven out of the city, while their children of tender age were kidnapped and baptized by force.

Because it's a bit controversial, he kept it in "Font size 1" so it was almost invisible.

But this signature was a perfect example of his latest modus operandi -- to lay low, participating in non-controversial discussions while gaining exposure for his extremist website -- and converting the CathInfo heathen.

I clearly state in the rules that if the Internet were a physical world, CathInfo would be a Catholic country -- not a heathen missionary land. But Capistrano clearly believed that CathInfo is missionary territory. He was trying to "get along" with us as best he could, so he could grab a few visitors for his bitter, home-aloner website and make a few "converts" to keep him company on his couch during his lonely Sunday mornings.

In short, Capistrano is a dogmatic Sedevacantist, as well as a dogmatic home-aloner. (Among other things!) He's exactly like CM (David Landry) or Frank Pagnanelli, except he doesn't get along with them.

He is either Richard Ibranyi, or closely linked to him. Richard Ibranyi (as can be discerned from his website) is completely full of himself. He exudes self-importance and self-confidence.

Capistrano seems to have no shortage of self-confidence either. He'll boldly go up to the moderator and ask for favors, privileges, etc.

Just to point out one thing that "doesn't add up" -- he has these initials of himself, RJMI (Richard Joseph Michael Ibranyi) and uses them *all over the place* like he wants to be famous. He doesn't talk about "Mary's Little Remnant" much at all by comparison. If he was seriously in it just for Jesus Christ or the Blessed Virgin, he wouldn't emphasize his *self* so much.

Then again, that isn't surprising. Those like David Landry and Richard Ibranyi spend all day writing up Abjurations and condemnations of this or that "heresy" or "heretic". They are completely alone in a cult/religion of their own making, and misery loves company. But anyone who can believe that "Mary's Little Remnant" is Population: 1 *has* to be more or less filled with pride.

Anyhow, anyone pushing such a website doesn't belong here, so I banned him.

Here is an excerpt from his "Abjuration" or profession of Faith, found on the website:

34. I reject and condemn as illegal and schismatic any bishop or priest that was consecrated or
ordained by the following non-Catholic bishops: Marcel Lefebvre, De Castro Mayer, Noe Thuc,
Carmona, Musey, Roberto Martinez, Guérard des Lauriers, Mendez, Clarence Kelly, Robert
McKenna, Oliver Oravec, John Hesson, Mark Pivarunas, Daniel Dolan, Vezelis, Patrick Taylor,
Thomas Sebastian, or any non-Catholic bishop or priest in their lineage who has not repented and
abjured from his illegal consecration or ordination

Raoul and others were right to notice something wrong with this member.

I didn't want to ban him rashly, as he wasn't overtly misbehaving. But I gathered this info from his website last night, and figured out his game. Sometimes it takes me a couple days, but I take care of my forum.


Matthew

I have made it clear that members aren't welcome to walk through the crowd of CathInfo members while keeping an aloof distance, as a missionary among heathens.

The rule could be summed up: You're either "one of us", and you may stay, or get out of here!

Such is contrary to the very idea of a Traditional Catholic forum -- an online community of serious-minded Traditional Catholics. How can you have a sense of community when one members looks at the other members (everyone but himself) as "conversion material"?

The fact that he planned on doing his conversions off-site makes no difference.

What's the difference between posting slander about Bishop Williamson or other good Catholics here on CathInfo, and posting a link to a website where the same kind of material is posted? There's no difference, except what URL is in your browser's address bar.

This is the man who called the most holy "Little Flower" Theresa, the "Little Stinkweed" because he perceived that she deviated from his magisterial decrees.  Utterly disgusting blasphemy against the Saints of God.

There is an increasing group of people here that are very disturbing, Capistrano's sig is very disturbing in that these people either a) Believe Propaganda made up to attack us, and then support the lies believing them to be good acts or b) are infiltrators trying to destroy and harm catholics from within by spreading lies while acting as if they are true to discredit the faithful or harm their faith.

He spreads heresy and contradictory heresy at that, he takes the name of St. John of Capistrano a Fransciscan Saint who travelled battling heresy(Note that it has always been condemned since the 5th century to baptise by force which he didn't, but more importantly an Inquisator has no legal authority over anyone who isn't baptised, only the secular power may judge a heathen) but here is the contradiction, this Saint was married, yes married before but never consumated the marriage and thus it was annulled and thus was not a valid or true marriage. Thusly he was allowed to become a Priest.

Yet this character in another thread states that consumation is not neccesary, of course that contradicts all church teaching throughout history, it would also mean that the evil Henry VIII was right and the church was wrong, which as we all know is not possible. This person also acts as if the nαzι's were good people when in reality they were anti-catholic, and Pope Pius XI had started warning the german Priests about the nαzι view points that was almost completely contrary to  the Catholic Viewpoint since 1933. He wanted to make sure that Catholics did not fall into the same trap that Raoul spotted earlier, Viewing one group as evil and then anyone who fights them as good. Well that is not true! the CATHOLIC CHURCH IS GOOD and all others in the Kingdom of Satan, inside the Kingdom of Satan and the master of lies they fight each other too! Evil fights Evil all the time, they turn on each other on a whim. One does not decide that Hitler is good just because he hated Communism! Which was what Pius XI was telling his Priests, and he was telling them this in 1933!

Hitler was not a Catholic, just as Luther is not a Catholic, both were baptised but that is all! In fact Hitler loved the writings of Luther, since they are very anti-Jєω he promoted them, but he thought of the church as being bad because we have canons that declare that we cannot kill Jєωs,, nor forcibly convert them.

He just wrote to me by e-mail.

He said he's not Richard Ibranyi, that Capistrano was a Catholic saint (John of Capistrano) and that he's not a dogmatic Feeneyite.

(I notice he doesn't deny the charges of dogmatic sedevacantism and dogmatic home-aloneism!)

He said the text was small because there was so much of it.



My response:

The John of Capistrano bit doesn't matter one way or the other.

The fact that you are so anxious to have your website in your sigline DOES suggest that it's yours. I'm sorry; I know human nature. You're either Richard Ibranyi or intimately connected to him. That fact that you're zealously promoting that website means you necessarily endorse everything contained on the website. That's the way it works.

You weren't sending people to this or that article -- you wanted a link to the main website page. So you must be happy about each and every page of that website.

I'm not stupid. I've been moderating this forum for over 5 years now, and I've seen all types. I've learned a lot about human nature during that time (though I wasn't exactly a kid when I started this site).

My wife and I have wasted enough time because of you, and the few seconds it takes me to finish this post will be the last seconds that I waste on this nonsense.

He only mentioned two accounts by name, which I verified were indeed from the same location and had the same posting style/beliefs as him.

BannedFromFE
Pessimist

The other 3 accounts I'm not sure about -- they might have already been banned.

Thanks. I've seen Raoul mention Ibranyi in one of his older posts but never knew who he was. Now I know.

Speaking of Frank Pagnanelli, by the way, it looks like he might have signed up on another account (under the screen-name "null"). I said on this thread that it looked like he signed up on another account, and interestingly got a thumbs-down (probably from him).

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=10362&f=4&min=100&num=10

Did he actually evangelize this flock with anathematized propositions?

If so, I suppose there is no recourse.

If not, why ban him?

Yes, he did. I'm sure one or two members (at least) clicked on one of the links he posted.

He was extremely interested in getting his website included in his signature. That seemed to be his top priority in being here. He certainly wanted to pollute the membership here with all Ibranyi's extreme, insane, ideas.

As I said before, this isn't the corrupt USA where a suitcase of money will buy you a congressman. This is a monarchy (as it were), and even if a man politely follows the rules, carefully staying within the letter of the law, it won't help him if he's trying to violate the spirit of the law. I am a human being, not a computer or a book of legal precedent. I use common sense in my decision-making process.

There will be no, "ARRGH! I could arrest that head bad guy if only he didn't have diplomatic immunity!" around here. This isn't Lethal Weapon.

Frankly, even if he isn't Ibranyi himself it wouldn't change anything. He is closely connected with him, if he's pushing Ibranyi's website that hard.