He is a canon lawyer, and used to work in a marriage tribunal in the conciliar Church

What a great recommendation.  I can say this: I wouldn't want any of you people sitting on a jury.  

before he came to tradition. I would say he is above SSPX politics.

Matthew, this thread is really a form of axe-grinding against me.  The SSPX has some pretty serious flaws, but certain types don't want to hear it.  And why do they react the way they do?  Because they are inculcated with the mentality of the SSPX.  

The SSPX has some pretty serious flaws, but certain types don't want to hear it.  And why do they react the way they do?  Because they are inculcated with the mentality of the SSPX.  

The first sentence is definately true. But if you take the way people 'react the way they do' on this site to many of your claims, its not what you say, but how many times you say it.

If I said to my sister, "Our mom is a good mom." I'm sure she'd agree.

If I told her, over and over and over again, one thousand times every chance I had, she would probably say, "Shut Up!"

Does this mean she doesn't think our mom is good? No. She's responding to my approach telling her about our mom.

You're not wrong on most of your commentary of the Society; but the constant relentless attacks on them gives an impression of hate and revenge, whether its true or not. It needs to stop, or no one will hear you but keep saying, "Shut Up!"

Yes, but its worth trying.

In fact, several years ago, an FSSP priest refused to baptize one of our daughters because the God parents attended our SSPX chapel back home.  He claimed that our marriage was invalid as well.  It took all of my energy to restrain myself from grabbing him by the vestments and taking him outside.

Some FSSP priests are like that, unfortunetly. Although, I know that there are also some FSSP priets who like Archbishop LeFebvre and the Society.

Rich, don't encourage him.  Saying that there are imperfect priests in the Society and the Bishop Fellay has possibly been imprudent is some circuмstances is a far cry from what Telesphorus' campaign of hatred has asserted.  There have been imperfect priests in all religious orders, there have been imprudent judgments made by superiors as long as the Church has been in existence.  Have you noticed that he has evaded my point about taking his assertions to their logical conclusions viz. the Catholic Church itself?  He knows full well where they lead, but he refuses to answer because it necessarily negates his willful evil.  He has made it clear that he will not relent in his assassination attempt on the Society, that it is a personal vendetta.  He will calumniate and evade; he will stonewall and distort until he runs out of emotion or comes to his senses.  Until then, there is simply no rational discussion possible.    

This is the remarkable truth about the abusive, slanderous mentality that infects the "double-tongued" clique:

I figured my time with Fr. Phluger would be rather limited so I immediately cut to the chase in inquiring about the status of Bp. Williamson. In the course of our talk, Fr. Phluger made some pointed derogatory statements about Bp. Williamson. These were topped off by his stunning assertion with respect to Bp. Williamson and this is verbatim: "He's a nαzι." As God is my witness that is exactly what this priest told me face to face.

I made the above quote known to Bp. Williamson as well as the full details of my conversation with Fr. Phluger in an email to the former one day later on February 21, 2011. I still retain that email as well as the reply I received to it from Bp. Williamson on February 22, 2011. (I also informed my SSPX pastor of the conversation and the specific nαzι assertion in an email to him on February 23rd.)

I am sorry to bring such a despicable affair to light at this time, but I think that those who are in a position to do so should hold Fr. Pfluger accountable for it. Don't shoot the messenger. In my opinion his aforesaid assertion to me was a grave calumny. Some may strongly disagree, but my conscience -- after much consideration -- informs me that my extraordinary step of making it public at this time is fully justified.

The internal exile of Bp. Williamson should in my opinion never have been imposed. Furthermore, in my opinion its continuation is absolutely wrong and is (or at least should be!) an ongoing scandal to the faithful.

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/10/letter-from-bishop-fellay-to-bishop.html

He really doesn't look like Ricardo Montalban in that get-up.