I should refrain from reading comments on sites like the Guardian. They make me testy.
What's interesting to me is that these points of views are hardly welcome in the USA anymore. Lou Dobbs was fired for it, and Pat Buchanan was also fired for it.
What's more, these points of views are condemned
even on extreme sites like this one.
What is shows you is that the cultural manipulators somehow have the ability to subvert people inside institutions that by all appearances should be solidly against them.
It is a mysterious phenomenon, how you can find
more intolerance of certain "right" positions (outside of key issues that all must agree with - among so-called "Trad" Catholics it's abortion, and not much else these days) than you will find on the pages of the Guardian!
It really is sinister, and I think one explanation is that the women and other people with similar social antennae try to compensate for their "extremism" by accepting whole-heartedly other parts of the leftist program. This gives them a social opening.
It also explains why so many socially conservatives (including, perhaps, someone like my own father, who was willing to spend a great deal to pay my older sister's way at a prestigious university - but the rest of us went to much less expensive, less prestigious universities) want their intelligent daughters to be high achievers in the secular world rather than as Catholic mothers. It's a form of social credit, to accept certain aspects of the modern world that
seem less harmful. (just about anything a person is praised for these days is likely to be bad or indifferent)