It doesn't change anything. Moslems and feminists are alike in thinking that female desire for male doesn't exist.
Both moslems and feminists think that the only reason why a woman might cleave to a man is money and financial dependance. And mutilation doesn't do away with the love of money.
Can you elaborate more on this? I think it's a fascinating observation.
Sorry for being late.
Have you ever wondered why islam gives such a perfect freedom to men and such strict limits to females?
You know the rational behind having such different standards for males and females in Islam is the idea that males are naturally lustful and multi-partner for whom it is almost impossible to control their desires, while females are on the contrary very cold and naturally avert to sex. So for females it is only too normal if they are chaste. And when a woman seeks marriage it is not because of feeling any attraction for males but because she wants shelter and money.
And when some girl falls it is again not because of lust but because the boy either fooled her, or forced her or because the girl had no one to educate and control her.
I know some moslem ladies who are proud of being cold and tell their female friends about it and everybody admires. I once asked one of them in secret if what she said was true and she said it was not, but she had to pretend because it was decorous.
You can never go to any islamic court and complain that your husband maltreats or hates or insults you, they are "insufficient causes" and don't give you right to divorce unless he wants, but it is enough to prove he doesn't give you money, you get a divorce whether he likes it or not.
They are like feminists as they interpret all female desires as financial material dependence and both see the male gender as a violent thing with uncontrlable lusts.