Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Britain's Monarchy  (Read 1478 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dawn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2439
  • Reputation: +46/-1
  • Gender: Female
    • h
Britain's Monarchy
« on: July 07, 2010, 12:57:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I have heard that this current Queen and her family are not the rightful claimants of the throne. Anyone know about this? And, if not who should be their. Maybe someone of Mary Stuart's lineage?
    Logged

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #1 on: July 07, 2010, 01:04:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I am not sure who the real monarchy is but they would have to be decended from the Queen of Scots.
    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Dawn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2439
    • Reputation: +46/-1
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #2 on: July 07, 2010, 01:05:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Thank you Roscoe
    Logged

    Offline Dawn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2439
    • Reputation: +46/-1
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #3 on: July 07, 2010, 01:08:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Did anyone ever read Benson's "Come Rack, Come Rope." It deals with the period of Mary Queen of Scots.
    Logged

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #4 on: July 07, 2010, 01:10:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Dawn
    I have heard that this current Queen and her family are not the rightful claimants of the throne. Anyone know about this? And, if not who should be their. Maybe someone of Mary Stuart's lineage?


    I am understanding-right or wrong-that Elizabeth I was declared null and void, so hence, future aspirants may be as they are Prots and holders of a Catholic throne.....Gerry Matitics has a good series on this, have talks 3 and 4...
    Logged
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Dawn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2439
    • Reputation: +46/-1
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #5 on: July 07, 2010, 01:13:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Gerry Matatics? I like him so thanks.
    Logged

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #6 on: July 07, 2010, 01:42:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • yes, part of larger series "The Ploy Against the Catholic Church"
    Logged
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline JoanScholastica

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 756
    • Reputation: +31/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #7 on: July 07, 2010, 06:14:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Dawn
    I have heard that this current Queen and her family are not the rightful claimants of the throne.


    that sounded strange...
    Logged

    Offline Dawn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2439
    • Reputation: +46/-1
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #8 on: July 07, 2010, 06:57:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Let me restate it. Queen Elizabeth and crew do not have the right to sit on the throne of England. I thought it would be someone of the Catholic Queen, Mary of Scotland and they answered my question.
    Logged

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #9 on: July 07, 2010, 07:15:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • And I might add that this applies to Eliz 1 and 2
    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline JoanScholastica

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 756
    • Reputation: +31/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #10 on: July 08, 2010, 11:12:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Dawn
    Let me restate it. Queen Elizabeth and crew do not have the right to sit on the throne of England. I thought it would be someone of the Catholic Queen, Mary of Scotland and they answered my question.


    But isn't James who succeeded Elizabeth I, the son of Mary, queen of Scots?
    Logged

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #11 on: July 09, 2010, 01:49:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • King James I was a Freemason/ Protestant( and most likely MK Ultra). Chas I( another Prot) was not hostile to Rome and probably would have been persuaded to convert but he was murdered by Cromwell. The grandsons of James I did revert back to the Papism of the Queen of Scots--  the rightful monarch today is decended from James II

    The grandmother and mother of Chas II and James II were both Catholics.
    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #12 on: July 09, 2010, 01:51:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: JoanScholastica
    Quote from: Dawn
    Let me restate it. Queen Elizabeth and crew do not have the right to sit on the throne of England. I thought it would be someone of the Catholic Queen, Mary of Scotland and they answered my question.


    But isn't James who succeeded Elizabeth I, the son of Mary, queen of Scots?


    but that line is off throne, the Stuarts, so where then does that leave us? since a non-Catholic is on the throne since, what, Anne in early 1700's? also, James I was a Prot....??

    Roscoe, the freaking James I did not smoke dope either, the cretin!!
    Logged
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #13 on: July 09, 2010, 02:25:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • The first Prot monarch is of course Henry-- although he would claim to be Catholic. The 2nd was Eliz 1( no blood relation to Eliz 2) the 3rd was William(1688)  and the fourth Anne.

    Whomever the true Jacobite Monarch is today, he or she is also possessed of Medici blood after Marie De Medici( wife of Chas I)

    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline JoanScholastica

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 756
    • Reputation: +31/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Britain's Monarchy
    « Reply #14 on: July 13, 2010, 03:18:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: roscoe
    King James I was a Freemason/ Protestant( and most likely MK Ultra). Chas I( another Prot) was not hostile to Rome and probably would have been persuaded to convert but he was murdered by Cromwell. The grandsons of James I did revert back to the Papism of the Queen of Scots--  the rightful monarch today is decended from James II

    The grandmother and mother of Chas II and James II were both Catholics.


    I understand. thanks!
    Logged
    Pages: [1] 2
    « previous next »