Author Topic: Boston Marathon...Liberty Graveyard (Read 3492 times)

John Grace · « **Reply #1 on:** April 17, 2013, 08:45:00 AM »

My godfather at my baptism, currently holidaying in Ireland would have been in Boston for the marathon. He will be at the London Marathon at the weekend.

I haven't watched the video but last time I looked at a website, Mossad was leading the poll as prime suspects.

No doubt it is a fαℓѕє fℓαg op.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #2 on:** April 17, 2013, 12:57:02 PM »

The current death count is three? Yet the bombs were set of by remote control? The death count is very low yet even in Iraq most roadside bombings were performed using remote control. If someone really wanted to kill a massive amount of people, why not target a more concentrated sporting event? The marathon would have many people but they would be stretched over the course of the run whereas a baseball or football game has 20-50 thousand in one location.

Sure sounds like a fαℓѕє fℓαg.

Some operatives were sent to pull off a fαℓѕє fℓαg but only do minimal damage - and yes, 3 dead in a major public event like the Boston Marathon is very minimal. A guy with a gas tank and a match could have killed more than that.

Add in the fact that the media is playing up the emotional angle almost constantly....

Bummer!

Quo Vadis Petre · « **Reply #3 on:** April 17, 2013, 01:03:51 PM »

Confirmed by eyewitness: Bomb squad drill was under way at Boston marathon

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039945_Boston_marathon_bomb_drill_Alastair_Stevenson.html#ixzz2QkFchevG

(NaturalNews) If you're looking for actual journalism surrounding the Boston marathon bombings, don't bother reading the mainstream media. The real breaking news is found in the alternative media, where Anthony Gucciardi of StoryLeak.com just nailed an on-the-record interview with Alastair Stevenson, the University of Alabama cross country track coach who heard law enforcement telling the crowd, "It's just a drill" immediately after the explosions.

The full phone interview is now posted online at both YouTube (where it is likely to be immediately censored):

and TV.NaturalNews.com (where it will NOT be censored)
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=95301C5F1DD70FFE9BDA21A4B43BD44D

Alastair Stevenson is a veteran marathon runner who has competed in dozens of marathons around the world, including the London Marathon. He's very familiar with the security typically found at marathons, and he immediately noticed something odd about the Boston marathon security.

"They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill," he was quoted as saying by Local15TV.com.

In the interview, you'll hear Stevenson say:

"At the start at the event, at the Athlete's Village, there were people on the roof looking down onto the Village at the start. There were dogs with their handlers going around sniffing for explosives, and we were told on a loud announcement that we shouldn't be concerned and that it was just a drill. And maybe it was just a drill, but I've never seen anything like that -- not at any marathon that I've ever been to. You know, that just concerned me that that's the only race that I've seen in my life where they had dogs sniffing for explosions, and that's the only place where there had been explosions."

Boston police deny the existence of a drill
Why is all this such a huge story? Because the Boston police department is on the record saying there was no drill!

People who are writing about the reality of the bomb drill are being called "conspiracy theorists" across the 'net. Yet the real conspiracy is found in the bomb drill cover-up.

The far more important question now is: Why would the Boston police LIE about the existence of a bomb drill?

The Boston marathon bombing is now officially a conspiracy cover-up.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039945_Boston_marathon_bomb_drill_Alastair_Stevenson.html#ixzz2QkFhqZPw

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #4 on:** April 17, 2013, 01:48:23 PM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

The current death count is three? Yet the bombs were set of by remote control? The death count is very low yet even in Iraq most roadside bombings were performed using remote control. If someone really wanted to kill a massive amount of people, why not target a more concentrated sporting event? The marathon would have many people but they would be stretched over the course of the run whereas a baseball or football game has 20-50 thousand in one location.

Sure sounds like a fαℓѕє fℓαg.

Some operatives were sent to pull off a fαℓѕє fℓαg but only do minimal damage - and yes, 3 dead in a major public event like the Boston Marathon is very minimal. A guy with a gas tank and a match could have killed more than that.

Add in the fact that the media is playing up the emotional angle almost constantly....

Bummer!

It sure is suspicious.

If it was a fαℓѕє fℓαg, I think it was botched.

As you pointed, out the death toll is relatively low, considering. The bombs were detonated at an odd time. If they would have been detonated when the first runners crossed the line, things would be quite different. Many more deaths and casualties. We know that the fed has no problem taking innocent lives. Why detonate a bomb during the Boston Marathon that wouldn't do the most imaginable damage? It doesn't add up.

The main thing for me, is that there is no villain. fαℓѕє fℓαgs usually have a villain very soon. 911 and Sandy Hook both had the villain within hours. Now we're two days removed and still no villain. Obviously the government and the media will use this event to their own end and we may never know the truth, but that fact alone leads me to think that the bombings weren't fαℓѕє fℓαg. At least for now.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #5 on:** April 17, 2013, 01:52:53 PM »

Most odd to me was the Sandy Hook moment of silence at the opening ceremony.
(Washington Post reported this)

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #6 on:** April 17, 2013, 09:13:24 PM »

www. NODISINFO.com

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #7 on:** April 18, 2013, 01:01:50 AM »

Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre

Confirmed by eyewitness: Bomb squad drill was under way at Boston marathon

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039945_Boston_marathon_bomb_drill_Alastair_Stevenson.html#ixzz2QkFchevG

(NaturalNews) If you're looking for actual journalism surrounding the Boston marathon bombings, don't bother reading the mainstream media. The real breaking news is found in the alternative media, where Anthony Gucciardi of StoryLeak.com just nailed an on-the-record interview with Alastair Stevenson, the University of Alabama cross country track coach who heard law enforcement telling the crowd, "It's just a drill" immediately after the explosions.

The full phone interview is now posted online at both YouTube (where it is likely to be immediately censored):

and TV.NaturalNews.com (where it will NOT be censored)
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=95301C5F1DD70FFE9BDA21A4B43BD44D

Alastair Stevenson is a veteran marathon runner who has competed in dozens of marathons around the world, including the London Marathon. He's very familiar with the security typically found at marathons, and he immediately noticed something odd about the Boston marathon security.

"They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill," he was quoted as saying by Local15TV.com.

In the interview, you'll hear Stevenson say:

"At the start at the event, at the Athlete's Village, there were people on the roof looking down onto the Village at the start. There were dogs with their handlers going around sniffing for explosives, and we were told on a loud announcement that we shouldn't be concerned and that it was just a drill. And maybe it was just a drill, but I've never seen anything like that -- not at any marathon that I've ever been to. You know, that just concerned me that that's the only race that I've seen in my life where they had dogs sniffing for explosions, and that's the only place where there had been explosions."

Boston police deny the existence of a drill
Why is all this such a huge story? Because the Boston police department is on the record saying there was no drill!

People who are writing about the reality of the bomb drill are being called "conspiracy theorists" across the 'net. Yet the real conspiracy is found in the bomb drill cover-up.

The far more important question now is: Why would the Boston police LIE about the existence of a bomb drill?

The Boston marathon bombing is now officially a conspiracy cover-up.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039945_Boston_marathon_bomb_drill_Alastair_Stevenson.html#ixzz2QkFhqZPw

Thanks for the link, QVP - the first video is still up, I just heard it - 4:10 duration:

25,165 views right now, so far. maybe they're leaving it up because it is
being kept up on the other website - and they're trying to find a way of shutting
down the other site first, then they'll pull the YouTube video and perform their
damage control. But any video that opposes the official line is for sure going to
have a limited lifetime. As George Bush Sr. said, "This shall not stand!!"

So anyone who wants to hear it, should listen quickly before it's removed!

Here are eyewitnesses with no agenda reporting that the police were saying all
over during the race that there is a drill going on, and it's just a drill, so there
is nothing to worry about, and even immediately at the time of the explosions,
the police at the scene were saying that it's just a drill, and nothing to worry
about. But now, after the fact, the media is saying that there was no drill, and
that anyone who says there was a drill is a "conspiracy theorist."

So, if you were one of the people at the Boston Marathon on Monday,
April 15th, National Extortion Day, the Holiest Day of the Year, and you heard
loudspeaker announcements that there is a drill in progress, or this is just a
drill, or nothing to worry about, it's only a drill, then you had better forget that
you heard that, because if you keep telling people about it, if you choose to
remember what you heard, if you are unwilling to ADJUST YOUR SENSE OF
REALITY to accommodate the official line, that "There Was No Drill Going On,"
then you are automatically suspect. You become the problem. You are then
a "conspiracy theorist" and you might become eligible for arrest as a
"terrorist" because you are unwilling to accept the correction.

A terrorist, then, is someone who refuses to be told what to believe, and
instead relies on his own 5 senses and his own experience and his own
firsthand knowledge based on what he saw, heard, felt, smelled, tasted and
touched. A terrorist is someone who dares to think, who dares to believe
his own eyes.

By this definition, the Fatima children were "terrorists." By this definition,
the 12 Apostles were "terrorists." By this definition Our Blessed Mother is a
"terrorist." And you can go down the list of all the canonized saints, and see,
that each one of them was a "terrorist."

So, when they call you "a terrorist," take consolation in the fact that you are
being rewarded with a compliment - that it puts you among good company,
for it is not what you might think it to mean. And a lot depends on how you
look at it.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #8 on:** April 18, 2013, 01:55:49 AM »

An anomaly is taking place here.

I made the above post about 40 minutes ago, and on the Index page
this thread shows the most recent post was made 4 hours earlier by
RomanCatholic1953.

That is the post that was BEFORE my post, above.

I wonder if others can see my post, above, or this one, for that matter.

Can you let me know if this post and the previous one (by me) are
visible, or if either one is showing on the Index page for General
Discussion?

Thanks.

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #9 on:** April 18, 2013, 05:32:23 AM »

Quote

Can you let me know if this post and the previous one (by me) are
visible...?

Neil, I see both...

MyrnaM · « **Reply #10 on:** April 18, 2013, 08:03:33 AM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat

An anomaly is taking place here.

I made the above post about 40 minutes ago, and on the Index page
this thread shows the most recent post was made 4 hours earlier by
RomanCatholic1953.

That is the post that was BEFORE my post, above.

I wonder if others can see my post, above, or this one, for that matter.

Can you let me know if this post and the previous one (by me) are
visible, or if either one is showing on the Index page for General
Discussion?

Thanks.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #11 on:** April 18, 2013, 10:14:45 AM »

I can see both.

Vandaler · « **Reply #12 on:** April 18, 2013, 12:03:33 PM »

Well, for one Neil, the video will not be removed because it does not violate Youtubes policies. Secondly, everyone knows that conspiracy theory videos abound on YouTube are totally allowed to stand. So clearly it's you that need to adjust to reality as you say.

Second, no one of import claims that ct's are terrorists. At best they are a side show.

claudel · « **Reply #13 on:** April 18, 2013, 04:03:31 PM »

Quote from: Mithrandylan

… The bombs were detonated at an odd time. If they would have been detonated when the first runners crossed the line, things would be quite different. Many more deaths and casualties. We know that the fed has no problem taking innocent lives. Why detonate a bomb during the Boston Marathon that wouldn't do the most imaginable damage? It doesn't add up. …

Good question, sir, but it does add up, actually—especially if it's a fαℓѕє fℓαg operation, and I agree that it is. Its goal, I am certain, was to ramp up the government-led and Jєωιѕн-originated hysteria to make the Second Amendment a dead letter.

Do a cost-benefit analysis. The immigration/invasion program has now advanced to the point where illegal and illegal immigrants and their "American" children now constitute something like a third of the population in every large U.S. city. These are, to a horrific extent, stupid, primitive people—yes, they are even stupider than the bulk of the native stock—and they are predisposed to follow orders so long as the locals and the feds continue to send them money confiscated from you and me and everyone else who works or has worked for a living. Besides, they know perfectly well that even more draconian and unconstitutional restrictions on private possession of firearms will be enforced only, only, on us, not them. Hence, why should the Obamanoids and their Mossad controllers invest the time and manpower in a large-scale bloodbath that will, at best, do no more "good" than this minispectacle and will also be more likely to have unforeseen effects and repercussions?

What I see happening in the next sixty days is this: the illegal and all-but-illegal population will join hands, figuratively speaking, with Jєωs and their allies among the remnant of the Christian population—at least, the kept media will tell us that they are holding hands. The proximate result may well be major expenditures to install a British-style network of CCTV cameras in every street in Boston and New York. That's just for starters, of course. Rome on the Potomac will be next, and then California, Massachusetts, and New York will lead the charge to eliminate every last vestige of privacy outside the haunts of our Tribally controlled rulers. The faux freedom lovers on Fox news and elsewhere will howl till they're blue in the face that true Americans should demand that the program be … reduced by 30 percent or so to keep this the Land of the Free.

And even some commenters at CI will be among the duped.

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #14 on:** April 18, 2013, 04:49:54 PM »

Quote from: claudel

Quote from: Mithrandylan
… The bombs were detonated at an odd time. If they would have been detonated when the first runners crossed the line, things would be quite different. Many more deaths and casualties. We know that the fed has no problem taking innocent lives. Why detonate a bomb during the Boston Marathon that wouldn't do the most imaginable damage? It doesn't add up. …

Good question, sir, but it does add up, actually—especially if it's a fαℓѕє fℓαg operation, and I agree that it is. Its goal, I am certain, was to ramp up the government-led and Jєωιѕн-originated hysteria to make the Second Amendment a dead letter.

Do a cost-benefit analysis. The immigration/invasion program has now advanced to the point where illegal and illegal immigrants and their "American" children now constitute something like a third of the population in every large U.S. city. These are, to a horrific extent, stupid, primitive people—yes, they are even stupider than the bulk of the native stock—and they are predisposed to follow orders so long as the locals and the feds continue to send them money confiscated from you and me and everyone else who works or has worked for a living. Besides, they know perfectly well that even more draconian and unconstitutional restrictions on private possession of firearms will be enforced only, only, on us, not them. Hence, why should the Obamanoids and their Mossad controllers invest the time and manpower in a large-scale bloodbath that will, at best, do no more "good" than this minispectacle and will also be more likely to have unforeseen effects and repercussions?

What I see happening in the next sixty days is this: the illegal and all-but-illegal population will join hands, figuratively speaking, with Jєωs and their allies among the remnant of the Christian population—at least, the kept media will tell us that they are holding hands. The proximate result may well be major expenditures to install a British-style network of CCTV cameras in every street in Boston and New York. That's just for starters, of course. Rome on the Potomac will be next, and then California, Massachusetts, and New York will lead the charge to eliminate every last vestige of privacy outside the haunts of our Tribally controlled rulers. The faux freedom lovers on Fox news and elsewhere will howl till they're blue in the face that true Americans should demand that the program be … reduced by 30 percent or so to keep this the Land of the Free.

And even some commenters at CI will be among the duped.

I don't follow your reasoning. Are you saying that the bombings were a government operation to justify a massive CCTV network in major cities? Where do the illegal immigrants come in? The fed doesn't need the approval of anyone to do what they want. I live in a big city (well, a capitol-- it is not the first city that would come to mind when someone thinks "big city") and there are already CCTV setups. And it's not Chicago, LA, NY, Boston, Miami, Dallas, Houston, Philly, etc. Maybe I didn't read your post carefully enough.

Also: I could easily see the bombings easily being used to justify anything, but that does not mean that they were a fαℓѕє fℓαg to begin with. The media and the fed will use anything to their advantage, even if they didn't plan the event. And again, I'm not saying it isn't a fαℓѕє fℓαg, just that I'm not satisfied with that information given what we know so far. Time will tell.