Redirect? You're the one bringing up a completely unrelated Council 20 years later by an entirely different Pope.

The analogy is lost on you.
The National Socialist policies are not mentioned ONCE in Mit. But you know what is mentioned?

"No one would think of preventing young Germans establishing a true ethnical community in a noble love of freedom and loyalty to their country. What We object to is the voluntary and systematic antagonism raised between national education and religious duty. That is why we tell the young: Sing your hymns to freedom, but do not forget the freedom of the children of God".


The fact that there were those, such as Bormann, who wanted to elevate German identity above ALL else was the problem. That WAS NOT NSDAP policy. The fact that the government was attempting to stop the corrupt clergy within the Reich from teaching the German youth "the virtues" of the Marxist ideal was the issue.
The Church itself was infiltrated at this point of history. Of course the Catholic schools would have been infiltrated as well. Pius XI was shielded from the reality of what was going on on the ground, just like the Cristeros fiasco.

The analogy is lost on you.
The National Socialist policies are not mentioned ONCE in Mit. But you know what is mentioned?

"No one would think of preventing young Germans establishing a true ethnical community in a noble love of freedom and loyalty to their country. What We object to is the voluntary and systematic antagonism raised between national education and religious duty. That is why we tell the young: Sing your hymns to freedom, but do not forget the freedom of the children of God".


The fact that there were those, such as Bormann, who wanted to elevate German identity above ALL else was the problem. That WAS NOT NSDAP policy. The fact that the government was attempting to stop the corrupt clergy within the Reich from teaching the German youth "the virtues" of the Marxist ideal was the issue.
The Church itself was infiltrated at this point of history. Of course the Catholic schools would have been infiltrated as well. Pius XI was shielded from the reality of what was going on on the ground, just like the Cristeros fiasco.

They had a State Church with its own altered version of the Bible, seems like policy to me. 

They had a State Church with its own altered version of the Bible, seems like policy to me.

Demonstrate.

Um, that just isn't true.  MBS is not a condemnation of NS but rather the extremes of UNRESTRAINED nationalism.  It was written by Eugenio Pacelli for Pius XI, and while justly concerned for what appeared as the Cult of the State in Germany (as well as Italy by the way)  The fact is that the practical aspects of NS were not only NOT condemned, but even encouraged in his later actions as POPE PIUS XII.  Hitler understood the German nation as in fact a corporate family that had a right and a duty to protect  itself and grow, seeking it's rightful aims  Pius the 12th wanted to prevent an over-arching worship of the state as a substitute God and I think he was correct to express these concerns.  He NEVER meant to condemn either the party or the German state, rather to check extremism and encourage political moderation.  

In a word, the Third Reich was NOT condemned in MBS, only the notion of the state replacing God.  Your statement is just WRONG

What you are saying is that the nαzι government was condemned by two pre-Vatican II Popes.  

Can we just admit that there WEREN'T good sides in WW2?

Both the Axis and the Allies were garbage. What other side used nuclear weapons on two cities and killed a six-digit sum of people?

This is the only Catholic perspective of world war two.
If they do not kneel before the Altar of the Lord and His Church, they are no friend or ally of the Church. Maybe instead of looking to non Catholics to defend Catholicism, we should do it ourselves. 

Can we just admit that there WEREN'T good sides in WW2?

Both the Axis and the Allies were garbage. What other side used nuclear weapons on two cities and killed a six-digit sum of people?

Nagasaki ABomb scored direct hit on Urakami Jesuit Cathedral... See D Dionisi-- Atomic Bomb Secrets.. 

Is there anything the nαzιs did to Jєωs that the Church hasn't done to Jєωs?

Of course most people will say that the Church has never attempted to genocide the Jєωs, but then neither did the nαzιs. Incidentally there's an interesting discussion about D. Bonhoeffer and Emmi Bonhoeffer over on Codoh.

I'm scratching my head trying to think of anything the nαzιs did to Jєωs that the Church hasn't done to them from time to time over the last 2000 years.

I'm inclined to agree.  the nαzιs did not attempt to genocide the Jєωs.  Drive them out of Germany, yes. Try to move them into Palestine, yes.  Use them as a slave wartime workforce, yes.  But genocide them, I doubt.