Personally, if I were Michele Renouf, I would be sending a solicitor's letter.
About what exactly?
One wonders whether you would give similar advice to Ashmolean/Blaise, who has been painted as any number of things by yourself and your confreres.
What is the purpose of naming this thread after him? It is clear that he has had no communication with the article's author. If anything, this should be named after the last conference and focused on that. But then, Diego, you do have an axe to grind.
Actually, this thread has done a sevice by exposing him as the apologist operative for freemasonic and Jewish interests which he and his supporters on IA have denied that he is.
The article in question is from a hyper Judaic source and if one reads its repetitive subtext, its anti-Catholic implications are only thinnly covered by a figleaf of concern for Facism. The as usual point is "anti-semitism" which of course is "rampant" among Traditional Catholics and all who have not submitted to the rabbinic dictates of the Novus Ordo/Holocaust religion.
It is now apparent that the Ashmolean persona has operated as a stealth standin for the collborators who are under Jewish influence. They have driven from IA, the most effective critics of their agenda and in their place have come a number of gatekeepers to defend their interests. This may not have been deliberate, however, that is the reality.
Mr. Krah must be quite pleased.