Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bishop Williamson contra the Votaries of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity  (Read 522 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sedetrad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1585
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Bishop Williamson contra the Votaries of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity
« on: April 13, 2013, 12:33:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bishop Williamson contra the Votaries of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity

    Elijah against the Baal priests

    By Michael Hoffman
    April 12, 2013 • www.revisionisthistory.org

    Enclosed (below) is the publication for the first time of an obtuse and ignorant eight page letter sent to Bishop Richard Williamson in December, 2010, by his subordinate, Fr. Niklaus Pfluger, "First Assistant" to the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) Superior General, Bernard Fellay.  Pfluger is a German Catholic priest of Bishop Richard Williamson's former SSPX fraternity. Bishop  Williamson, you may recall, made international headlines by refusing to recant his statement to a Swedish television station that the persecution of Judaic persons had been exaggerated, that no one was gassed in homicidal chambers, and that the Six Million death toll was an unconscionable exaggeration. For his remarks, he was expelled by Fellay from the SSPX seminary in Argentina where he was rector,  and expelled from Argentina by the government. He faces continuing prosecution in criminal court in Germany (where he gave the interview to Swedish TV).

    Lacking the courage of the recusant Catholic priests who were racked, drawn and quartered and beheaded in Elizabethan England for holding to the truth that the rule of God is higher than the rule of monarchs, the German SSPX have been soiling their pants in terror over the prospect that if they embraced their own Bishop Williamson's right to have an opinion, as a Shepherd, on what St. Paul called "Jєωιѕн fables," (Titus 1:14), they would have to suffer the full fury of the government of Germany in closing their schools and imprisoning them. Any Amish or Old Order Mennonite of my acquaintance, and I have known about one hundred or so of them these past 25 years, would willingly suffer imprisonment, or flee with school children if necessary, in order to defy the state on a point of truth vs. lies, but not the German SSPX, or the SSPX in general under Bishop Bernard Fellay.

    In their timidity, the SSPX leadership have adopted the rabbinic h0Ɩ0cαųstianity theology of Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, while claiming to uphold "traditional Catholicism." Where was h0Ɩ0cαųstianity in the pontificate of Pope Pius XII? Robert Faurisson of France has written at length on the subject of Pope Pius XII refusing to uphold the lie of the extermination gas chamber legends.

    In Rev. Pfluger's hectoring missive to Bishop Williamson, reference will be seen to certain infallible "h0Ɩ0cαųst" sources with which he upbraids Bishop Williamson, such as (Jean-Claude) Pressac, who gave up in despair and admitted defeat in his goal of proving the existence of execution gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau, and most amusingly of all, to Dr. Raul Hilberg. Bishop Williamson cannot believe Hilberg or think him credible, because Williamson took the trouble to read this writer's book, The Great h0Ɩ0cαųst Trial, which docuмents Hilberg's response to questions put to him during the 1985 trial in Toronto of Ernst Zundel, by the late traditional Catholic defense attorney Doug Christie. In court, Mr. Christie challenged Hilberg to furnish one scientific report of gassings in Auschwitz. Hilberg's response: "I'm at a loss." He couldn't do it! At the second Zundel trial in 1988, Hilberg was invited by the prosecution to testify and face cross-examination one more time by Christie (backed again by Faurisson's research). Hilberg refused, for obvious reasons.

    "Traditional Catholic" defenders of Fellay's SSPX who are traducers of Bishop Williamson, have told this writer that secular history has nothing to do with the SSPX's mission. If that is the case, why was Bishop Williamson being forced both by the pope's Vatican Secretariat of State and Bishop Fellay to recant his doubts about the homicidal gas chamber allegations? If Bishop Williamson had doubted the number of people who died in the Black Hole of Calcutta in British India, or at Elmira Prison Camp in New York during the cινιℓ ωαr, or under Ariel Sharon's carpet-bombing of downtown Beirut, Lebanon in August of 1982, neither the Vatican nor Fellay would have uttered a word of censure or reproach. Yet when it comes to what J.-M. LePen rightly termed "a detail of history" -- the claims of Auschwitz "extermination gas chambers," Williamson must bow to the secular consensus, or be denied exercise of his episcopal office (according to the pope's Secretariat), and face expulsion from the SSPX ( by order of Fellay).

    Why the special solicitation for one detail of secular history above all others? The world's only "h0Ɩ0cαųst" (or 'Shoah' as Pope John Paul II started to term it in line with тαℓмυdic mystification), has become a false religion, a religion of Judaism for gentiles. It is a fiendishly sly marketing strategy for Judaizing the West and rendering Christ's Church Militant a pile of quivering jello.

    We have heard nothing from Bishop Fellay or Fr. Pfluger comparable to the windage they have exhaled concerning the shoah-bizness, concerning the concerted movement led by multi-millionaire Hollywood movie director James Cameron to deny the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The worldwide organized movement of Resurrection-denial, with its origins in the Israeli state, is not a subject of anxious concern for modern Catholic popes or "traditional Catholic" Bishop Fellay. What does passionately concern and engage them, is the rise of any movement that obstructs the march to replace Calvary with Auschwitz as the central ontological point of suffering in the history of the West. The use of "h0Ɩ0cαųst" as a brand and trademark of Judaism and the Israeli state leaves no intellectual, sociological or cultural room for any other h0Ɩ0cαųst. It eclipses, first, the h0Ɩ0cαųst on Calvary, and then every other h0Ɩ0cαųst throughout history including the Judaic-Communist h0Ɩ0cαųst of millions of Christians in Russia and Eastern Europe from 1917 onward.

    The tragic deaths of hundreds of thousands of Judaic persons under the nαzιs is given the name of h0Ɩ0cαųst though very few of even the most frenzied partisans of Zionism and тαℓмυdism claim Judaic persons died by fire in cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs. However, the mass incineration of Japanese in Tokyo, Germans in Dresden and Arabs in Beirut may not, under any circuмstances, have their deaths by fire hallowed by the dictionary denotation of immolation by fire -- h0Ɩ0cαųst. Even the mass murder of unborn children by abortion is not permitted to enter the linguistic sanctuary and be titled a h0Ɩ0cαųst, without incurring rabid howls of outrage from Zionists and rabbis.

    This whole degenerate process, the friends of the SSPX tell us, has no bearing on the mission of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (SSPX founder). Bishop Williamson had better believe about World War II what the ignoramuses of the SSPX leadership believe, in line with their Israeli army-connected SSPX lawyer, Mr. M. Krah, that the Kabbalistic Six Million figure, and the allegations of mass extermination gassings in the magic gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau, are Holy Writ. These alleged thinking human beings in the SSPX, supposed heirs of St. Thomas Aquinas, have not bothered to read Dr. Arthur Butz, Dr. Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf,  Carlo Mattagno, Fred Leutchter, Richard Widmann, Samuel Crowell, the transcript of the second Zundel trial, my book on the first Zundel trial, or any other dissenting, alternative, skeptically scientific work that contradicts the Official h0Ɩ0cαųst Liturgy of the New Church of the Gas Chambers, which all Catholics must believe on penalty of sharing the same fate as Bishop Williamson -- expulsion, financial hardship, criminal prosecution, and ritual assassination of reputation by the media, and by fellow Catholics.

    In the first years of the new millennium we watch in horror as revolutionaries accomplish every one of their objectives: ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ "matrimony," women in combat, raw violence and hard-core pornography spilling from the TV and the Internet unobstructed, and тαℓмυdic Judaism and the Antichrist Israeli state everywhere on the rise. Month after month the enemies of God succeed in reversing, in just a few years' time, four thousand years of divine law and western heritage. Can anyone be so dense as to fail to see that, connected to this decay process of human alchemy, is the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" propaganda that enshrines Judaic suffering in World War II to the level of a cosmic idol to which everyone in the West must bow?

    Quote
    The papacy, the Vatican, and the SSPX have all bowed, have all consented to this idolatry. In these dark times, Bishop Williamson and a tiny handful of cast-off priests (Frs. Pfeiffer, Hewko, Chazal and a few others) stand like Elijah against the Baal priests.


    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male


    Offline In Excelsis Deo

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 2
    • Reputation: +12/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson contra the Votaries of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity
    « Reply #2 on: April 13, 2013, 07:58:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Fr. Pfluger
    "You have an opinion, then you look around for a few unconnected details which somehow fit this opinion (for instance the “Leuchter Report”), and you hawk it all as the truth."


    Hmmm, let's see how Fr. Pfluger formulates HIS opinion of the kosher approved version of 911:

    Fr. Pfluger has an opinion [the result of many years of modernist, propaganda], then he looks around for a few unconnected details which somehow fit HIS opinion [for example CNN's relentless 'sob-story' coverage of 911], and he hawks it all as truth.

    The only difference between these two seemingly conflicting opinions is that Bp. Williamson relies on common sense, where as Fr. Pfluger relies on state-sanctioned propaganda.

    Fr. Pfluger also mentions "UN-connected details" without pointing to one shred of evidence to prove that they are UN-connected.