Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: RonCal26It is pious for an orthodox-minded Novus Ordo prelate to speak against communion in the hand. But executing Catholic practices in a Protestant-made liturgy of the New Mass is like putting lipstick on a pig. The real solution is to return to Tradition and if possible, conditionally ordain the New Bishops and New Priests ordained in the New Rite, since evidence pointed by Fr. Malachi Martin and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre demonstrate the New Rite may be doubtful as a result of defect of intention.Any rite can be invalid for that reason.
It is pious for an orthodox-minded Novus Ordo prelate to speak against communion in the hand. But executing Catholic practices in a Protestant-made liturgy of the New Mass is like putting lipstick on a pig. The real solution is to return to Tradition and if possible, conditionally ordain the New Bishops and New Priests ordained in the New Rite, since evidence pointed by Fr. Malachi Martin and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre demonstrate the New Rite may be doubtful as a result of defect of intention.
The real solution is to return to Tradition .....
Quote from: Augstine BakerQuote from: RonCal26It is pious for an orthodox-minded Novus Ordo prelate to speak against communion in the hand. But executing Catholic practices in a Protestant-made liturgy of the New Mass is like putting lipstick on a pig. The real solution is to return to Tradition and if possible, conditionally ordain the New Bishops and New Priests ordained in the New Rite, since evidence pointed by Fr. Malachi Martin and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre demonstrate the New Rite may be doubtful as a result of defect of intention.Any rite can be invalid for that reason.A rite of the Church can never be invalid per se - not for any reason.