CathInfo.com

Without knowing (or particularly caring about) the details of the allegations against Bill Cosby,

Sometimes people are happy to remain ignorant.  I'm surprised you'd be among them, BTNYC.

I will point out that I find it suspicious that a certain "viral video" telegraphed this current media circus one month ago. Truth be told, I find every "viral" phenomenon suspicious. I find the very concept of online "viral" phenomena suspicious (remember the "Ice Bucket Challenge?"), as it smacks of the typical "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" tactics of the NWO.

While your concerns about Internet data manipulation are not unfounded, it seems to me that you're missing out if you can't be bothered to hear what the victims have to say.  

When a White woman of social standing who has literally thousands of friends on her social network list goes public with such information, she would have to be lying to all her contacts for years in order to pull it off.  Why would she do that?

In any event, here's a link to an article on the original "viral" video. Pretty interesting that this painfully unfunny ghetto hominid explicitly connects this mess with Cosby's (very justified) criticisms of black ghetto victim "culture" (which "culture" we all know was created and perpetuated by the selfsame Tribe that founded the NAACP - and I'm not talking about the Maasai):

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/hannibal-buress-bill-cosby-rapist-article-1.1981959

Perhaps you might find it useful to change the subject, but you really ought to be hearing what the whistleblowers have to say, and you should be thinking about the risks they're taking in their social networks for saying so.  

If they were all lying, their friends would abandon them, and what good would that do for them?  What would be their motive?  

One of them said that a few months after she was molested by Cosby in his own home, she was invited to a gala celebration (with her husband) where 'the Cos' was the center of attraction.  She acquiesced to go to the event, but she made sure she would not dare physically approach 'the Cos' for any reason whatsoever.  She had kept her secret even from her husband (who does not doubt her now BTW) and excused herself every time someone asked her to come up and say "hi" to Cosby or get into a group photo with him.  The memory of the affair was and continues to be a sickening one to her, and to be honest, she's real sick and tired of being sick and tired.

Are you going to call her a liar?  


.

This accusations are most certainly bogus.  In America, young single women don't go to a famous star's home to not engage in sex.  In fact they go there for that very purpose.  None of those women are honorable wait to marriage types.  Also that there was never police reports filed or a criminal investigation, and the idea they were too afraid to come forward (Bill Cosby wasn't the mafia) or that they were ashamed, nope, not in free love pro-sex America, that just does not make sense.  And every woman knows that victimization is political power and a real money maker.  These aging women just want attention and lots of money.  And that's all they're doing, is getting attention and waiting for inevitable checks to be cut to them.

I guess for Bill Cosby, when it rains it pours.   :stare:

BTNYC is actually smart to not waste time on this story, although I think Matthew may be on to something with the suddenness of it all.  

Neil is right, too.  We've got to know the facts if we're going to make any kind of judgement call.  Matthew wasn't questioning the veracity of all those ladies and their accusations, he was curious about the timing of it all.

Bill Cosby, in the past, did full-heartedly take sides in the O.J. Simpson trial and then, sadly, he found out what it was like to have a family member murdered although Mr. Cosby didn't have hordes of human animals jeering at his the way Mr. Goldberg did.