Judaism was hijacked and corrupted big time by the "traditions of men."  Caiphas was the high priest of the corrupted religion.  He flat out rejected Jesus Christ and condemned Him of blasphemy.  The God-Man, on the other hand, never once rejected the authority and or position of Caiphas as being the valid high priest.  Interesting!

He's using the transition from the Old to the New Testament to "totally destroy" the position of Sedevacantism. I'm surprised you don't see the relevance. 

I think that everyone's given up.  

I suppose the only thing to do now is to escape the exploding space ship in a lifepod and wait for the oxygen to run out.  


I wouldn't call this despair.  God will win, ultimately.  But objectively speaking, I have my doubts that I'll live to see it in this life.  In the meantime, I expect to behold nothing but reckless, needless destruction until the end of my days.    

My escape pod ran out of oxygen. Eastern Catholicism. There are none in my area now.
I find myself more and more at an Eastern Orthodox Divine Liturgy. My soul is not accosted by people upturning a palm to receive Him at communion. There are no girl altar boys. They are chanting prayers before the Liturgy begins, and during. There is no hand holding during the Our Father. There are no drums or guitars.
Yes, there is no communion for me, but neither is there at a NO parish. I am too anguished to receive. Are there any holy priests left? We are but pilgrims in a land barren, God help us, Lord, have mercy on us.

And aren't the eastern rites required to accept the modernist code of canon law?

You must have a different definition of 'holy'. All I have seen is unholy, since my family fled in 1969.

Have you even tried to look at the evidence?  Have you talked with any sedevacantist clergy?  Or do you, as most anti-sedevacantists, simply taken it as a matter of faith that the Dimond Brothers speak for all sedevacantists or that "Pope Michael" is the example of sedevacantism par excellence?

Before condemning sedevacantists as Protestants, perhaps you should consider the actual Protestantism of the Recognize and Resist beliefs which sift everything their pope says for signs of Catholicism and accept only what they want from their sure rule of faith and reject whatever you don't like.

The problem begins when one set the question of the pope as the first question.  Sedevacantism is not the foundation; it is the logical conclusion of the question:  Is Vatican 2 Catholic?