Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bar stool economics  (Read 405 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31182
  • Reputation: +27097/-494
  • Gender: Male
Bar stool economics
« on: February 07, 2008, 02:18:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten
    comes to $100.  If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would
    go something like this:

        The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

        The fifth would pay $1.

        The sixth would pay $3.

        The seventh would pay $7.

        The eighth would pay $12.

        The ninth would pay $18.

        The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

        So, that's what they decided to do.

        The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the
    arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.   "Since you
    are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost
    of your daily beer by $20." Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

        The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so
    the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.
    But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could
    they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair
    share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they
    subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the
    sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar
    owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by
    roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each
    should pay.

        And so:

        The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100%
    savings).

        The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

        The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

        The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

        The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

        The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

        Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four
    continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men
    began to compare their savings.

        "I only got a dollar out of the $20,"declared the sixth man. He
    pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

        "Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar,
    too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"

        "That's true" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back
    when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

        "Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get
    anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

        The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

        The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine
    sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the
    bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough
    money between all of them for even half of the bill!

        And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is
    exactly how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes
    get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack
    them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In
    fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is
    somewhat friendlier.



     David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D. Professor of Economics University of Georgia
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Vandaler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1664
    • Reputation: +33/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Bar stool economics
    « Reply #1 on: February 07, 2008, 03:38:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I guess it's cute to make a point but it's fundamentally flawed.  Where's the important error ?

    Edit: I retract, the math seems fine even though a bit contrived

    However, David R. Kamerschen did not write this... and different versions of this text as been floating around.

    His denial can be read here