Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => General Discussion => Topic started by: Gregory I on November 05, 2011, 01:35:31 PM
-
The content is not so bad Matthew, it is simply the fact that he is starting dozens of threads and not finishing or following up or even participating in coherent discussion. He is displaying all the attributes of a troll. Can we please consider it?
Thanks,
Gregory I.
-
I am with Gregory, romantheology is a troll and should be banned. Looking at his posts, he reminds me alot of that RescuedByMary person who posted here in February (who was believed to be either "Pope" Augustine or David Hobson). They have the same posting style and about the same posting font, and also both act sort of feminine and make crazy remarks. And like Hobson, romantheology seems to like gossipping about other indivisuals, particularly Bishop Pivarunas and the CMRI. This is precisely the same agenda David Hobson had when posting, cutting down other people.
So it's Matthew's call obviously, but it's pretty clear that romantheology is just here to cause trouble and to ruin people's reputations.
-
:applause:
I so agree. Please ban Roman!
-
I throw my vote in for his ban as well.
-
This troll is lowering the quality of CathInfo discussions.
He must be rebuked and banned immediately.
-
romantheology, as Hobble pointed out on another thread, may be mirarivos on another account, who was banned for posting calumny about sedes I think.
-
His specific crime? He doesn't finish a thread. What's next? "He didn't finish his peas."
I can only imagine how miserable and un-Catholic life would be if some of you managed to inveigle yourselves into positions of real power. Gestapo and Cheka had nothing on some of you.
I suggest banning the next tin pot dictator who calls for the ban of another.
-
Diego, people can't sign up on multiple accounts. If he's someone on another account, he needs to be banned. Especially if he's David Hobson.
-
And some of you accused me of being someone from another account and were wrong.
Don't you learn from your mistakes?
Have you no humility? Have no no discernment? Have you no fairness?
The way some of you are so quick to your cartoonish lynch mob judgment, you'd think you also bilocated and had Padre Pio's ability to read souls.
(http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/7/N/e/2/the-lynch-mob.jpg)
-
Thing about trolls is, once they get a single reply, game over. They win.
Just put them on ignore. They will get tired and leave, or get frustrated enough to post something over the top, and Mathew will ban them.
-
Good advice from Charles.
-
Banning someone from a private forum has nothing to do with the lynch mob or gestapo references above. The question here is, do people here like to waste their time casting pearls before swine? Do people here have time for that?
I once had a puppy who made a mess all over the kitchen every day while I was gone. I gave it to someone who had time for it. I did not. I made two people and one dog happier.
This is a private forum and banning someone is completely within the owner's rights. No shoes, no shirt, no service! No love lost!
-
The way some of you are so quick to your cartoonish lynch mob judgment, you'd think you also bilocated and had Padre Pio's ability to read souls.
I've told you before that you don't need to act like you're the moderator. You're not the moderator and therefore have no right to tell us what to do. Do you have any idea of how dangerous David Hobson is? You probably don't even know who he is.
Oh, and stupid cartoon. Especially considering the guy at the end uses God's Name in vein.
-
Let me get this straight.
On the thinnest of suspicions and having been wrong before, you want to ban someone, but I am the one who is "acting like the moderator."
Go figure.
...God's name in vein [sic] ...
Oh, the irony.
:scratchchin:
:pop:
-
LOL, you aren't acting like the moderator if you want someone banned. I'll accept whatever Matthew decides, just stating my opinion that romantheology should be banned. You're acting like the moderator for telling us what to do.
Anyway Diego, I don't want to start a rivarly. I'm just saying if this guy is David Hobson, he needs to be banned. Hobson is a very dangerous and ruthless person.
-
Congratulations Diego. You win the award for Most Spectacularly Irrelevant Use of a Cartoon Ever.
Judging someone's objective actions as being evil or wrong-headed is not "the pot calling the kettle black." It doesn't mean that the people who are complaining about Diego are also commiting evil or wrong-headed actions.
Many, many, MANY evils of our time arise from a superstitious, fearful and craven (mis)understanding of the concept "Don't judge." It is so bad that people will defend child molesters while attacking those they persecute, because they don't want to see the problem and admit to the existence of sin in their perfect little worlds; that is how twisted this false charity has become. Or in the case of some in the SSPX, they will attack sedes yet cut incredible amounts of slack for the anti-Popes.
What Jesus actually meant was that we should be aware that we are all sinners, and not condemn anyone else as if they are reprobates without hope of ever changing or attaining redemption. That may seem like it fits your cartoon but no, it doesn't, because certainly we can judge an ACTION as objectively good or evil. We just don't have final judgment over the soul; that belongs to God. We don't get to say "You're a bad person, you're condemned." We can say "You're doing the wrong thing," or "You're an enemy" ( while praying for said enemy ).
If we weren't meant to question any fellow Catholics, why does Christ talk about loving our enemies? Because he is most certainly talking about other Catholics, at least in part. We will all have enemies among the Catholics. Friends may become enemies; and enemies may become friends.
Asking for someone with little control over his mouth to be banned from the site is not calling your brother "raka." It is an act of charity, since this person most likely is committing sins of calumny and slander. At any rate he does nothing but gossip.
If people would just understand more about the various kinds of judgment, they would not be so easy to sucker for decade after decade. We are not asked to know the heart; but we are asked to be wise as serpents, and soft as doves.
-
I am in favor of discernment, but justice demands that you have evidence beyond your imagination.
Evidence. It is not a difficult concept.
Besides, you are only going after your latest victim because you are antisemitic.
[yes, I was kidding about that one]
-
How is s/he still here and aquinasq gone?
-
Aquinasq just brushed aside the scripture verse that says the God of the pagans are devils, brushed aside tradition, argued unbaptized babies were baptized by Jesus or saints and angels before they died and started calling people "narrow" because they didn't go along with his liberalism.
He was posting here to hijack the board. He said he couldn't understand how masses could be reparation for sins. He's not a traditional Catholic, but he claims he is, because he is dishonest. I am convinced he was bad-willed, here to goad us, to promote his liberalism and to undermine the religion.
Most liberal Catholics are bad-willed to some extent. You can tell that they are because they never criticize non-Catholics beliefs, only traditional beliefs. You can't be a good-willed Catholic if you are really anti-Catholic. There's no such thing as a good-willed Modernist. There may be good-willed people with ideas they picked up from modernism, but modernism in its essence is the convoluted rejection of the Faith as Truth, it's intended to be deceptive and double-tongued.
That's why I can't accept post-conciliar Popes. They know very well they don't believe in the religion, and they arrogantly claim authority over it, arrogantly persecute those who do believe the religion, and insolently pander to false religions.
-
romanthelogy needs to be banned next.
He just inferred Bishop Pivarunas of the CMRI was ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ. No translation needed...blatant and clear-text for all to see.
-
This topic alone: http://www.cathinfo.com/index.php/is-pivarunas-gαy should be enough to ban him.
It is unconscionable that any person would simply start a topic in the way about anyone, let alone a Catholic priest or bishop. It might have been acceptable if he had some evidence, but he did not even try to sound as if he is a moral being.
This creature disgusts me.