https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/06/legal_confidentiality_of_catholic_confession_to_be_breeched_.html

June 14, 2018
Legal confidentiality of Catholic confession to be breached
By Thomas Lifson
The Catholic Church's practice of Confession is a sacrament of the faith, with the priest hearing confessions held to an inviolable sacramental seal, under pain of excommunication for the priest if that seal is broken.  Accordingly, the law in most Western countries protects the priest hearing confessions from being compelled to testify against the penitent who admits a crime.
That accommodation of law is about to be broken in Australia.  The Australian Associated Press reports:

South Australian priests hearing confessions about child abuse will have a mandatory obligation from October to report the matter to police.
SA will become the first state to adopt the recommendation of the abuse royal commission, meaning priests face the prospect of criminal charges for failing to report child abuse revealed in confession.
"For many years priests and ministers have been obliged to report outside of confessional and we changed the law last year to be effective first of October," Attorney-General Vickie Chapman told ABC radio on Thursday.

[color][size][font]
A later dispatch from the AAP elaborates:
[/font][/size][/color]

Not reporting abuse will carry a maximum $10,000 fine, and brings expectations of priests in line with those of social workers, teachers, medical professionals and others in positions of authority.
But Bishop Greg O'Kelly said the church had not been made aware of the change which was legislated last year, and was now considering its implications.

[color][size][font]
Protecting abused children of course is a worthy goal and a particular vulnerability of a Catholic Church still recovering from its own child sex abuse scandals.  For those opponents of the Church eager to do it harm, it represents an ideal opportunity to attack its legal status and bring turmoil to its priestly ranks, who will be forced to choose between prosecution and excommunication.
Even though I am not a Catholic, I view this move with great alarm.  Owing to its history, size, and status as a diplomatic entity with sovereign capital in Vatican City, the Church stands as a bulwark for biblical teachings.  That has won it determined enemies.
Our Australian correspondent John McMahon, who brought this to my attention, comments, "This was inevitable.  The long term aim of these activists has always been to destroy the Catholic Church."[/font][/size][/color]

.
It's hard to imagine how this could be enforced. What priest is going to be able to say with absolute certainty what the identity of the penitent was? Of course, he would be concerned that he might make a mistake. Maybe he had THOUGHT that it was John Smith confessing, who sounds a lot like Andrew Crabtree, but he couldn't be entirely certain which it was. Does he report both names? Then at least one would be a mistake. Maybe they're both mistakes! Then the real responsible party goes free and two innocent men are falsely accused!
.
So they'd have to require that priests in Australia have a new system by which anyone confessing their sins would have to fill out an application to confess and a clerk or someone like a notary, would have to verify identity of the penitent before he would be allowed to enter the confessional, and the priest hearing the confession would have to have access to the verified information on the application while he's hearing the confession so he would be able to decide if what he hears rises to the level of his obligation to make a report. He might want to come out of the confessional to make a visual check on who the penitent was speaking to him. So they'd be prone to getting rid of the confessional screen that seems to hide the faces of penitent and priest. Does that encourage sinners to confess their sins?
.
If it applies to child abuse, why stop there? If someone admits to murder, or bank robbery, or embezzlement or any other crime, why would the state NOT want to require the priest to report the information and attest to the identity of the admitted perpetrator?

Needless to say, the Jєωs have considerable influence and power in the government.  This is rich, considering their predeliction for pedophilia.   The fellow is right about trying to destroy the Church, what else is new?

Needless to say, the Jєωs have considerable influence and power in the government.  This is rich, considering their predeliction for pedophilia.   The fellow is right about trying to destroy the Church, what else is new?

Protestants also do not respect the seal of confession.