SOME QUESTIONS FOR THE HIERARCHY OF THE SOCIETY OF ST. PIUS X (SSPX)
IS THE DEROGATION OF CALVARY AND THE ASCENDANCE OF AUSCHWITZ "YOUR
FIGHT"?
by Michael Hoffman | April 21, 2010
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2010/04/some-questions-for-hierarchy-of-society.htmlIf you have been privy to the reasons Bishop Richard Williamson's
Catholic SSPX order has dismissed him as seminary rector, exiled him to
London, placed him under a gag order and refused to offer public prayers
for his welfare, then you know they have been saying it is because the
"h0Ɩ0cαųst is not our fight."
Even if that were the case, Bishop Williamson's views on history could
never justify his persecution by his own order. If the hierarchy of the
SSPX had wanted to distance themselves from Bishop Williamson's views on
matters of secular history having no bearing on faith and morals, they
could have done so, while at the same time pointing out that judging
debates about world history does not come under the authority or
competence of clerics or Catholic fraternal societies, in which case
Bishop Williamson would still be rector of a seminary, free to have an
opinion and exercise his office as bishop.
Had Bishop Williamson denied the Israeli h0Ɩ0cαųst against the
Palestinians he would have faced no repression of any kind from the
Vatican or Bishop Bernard Fellay, the head of his order. If Palestinians
had insisted that the Church silence and suspend Bishop Williamson on
the grounds that he denied the h0Ɩ0cαųst in Palestine, the Vatican and
the SSPX would have surely refused, rightly stating that it is not their
duty to pass judgment one way or another on controversies in secular
history.
Instead, we witness the tragic politicization of the Church, whereby the
history of the alleged German gas chamber "h0Ɩ0cαųst" against Judaic
persons has a much higher claim on Catholic belief than does the Israeli
h0Ɩ0cαųst against the Palestinians. Most Catholics would pour scorn on
the idea that a bishop must be suppressed to placate Arabs because he
cast doubt on the Israeli h0Ɩ0cαųst in Palestine. But "The h0Ɩ0cαųst,"
as the suffering of Judaic persons during World War II has come to be
known as a result of the imposition of a type of Newspeak, has in fact
entered the Catholic Church and assumed a position as a de facto sacred
dogma.
We must no longer run from the fact that the
religion-of-Judaism-for-gentiles which this writer terms
"h0Ɩ0cαųstianity" derogates the Passion of Our Lord in favor of the
notion that the supreme suffering of all history was experienced at
Auschwitz by Judaics. This is the stated position of Cardinal Sean P.
O'Malley and of many other bishops and cardinals of the modern Catholic
Church.
The SSPX, said to be a priestly fraternity that wishes to defend the
Church as it existed prior to Vatican Council II, would appear to be
complicit in cooperating with the modernist infiltration of the
rabbinic Shoah theology into the Church, and priests and laity of the
SSPX are told that this modernist infiltration is not their fight.
Indeed, by their silence and inaction they are party to this subversion.
I have a question for the hierarchy of the SSPX: If the derogation of
Calvary in favor of Auschwitz as the supreme martyrdom in world history
is not your fight, what is?
I have witnessed the SSPX hierarchy expending a significant amount of
time and energy kowtowing to h0Ɩ0cαųstianity. I have seen them do
nothing noteworthy, however, about the rapidly increasing use of the
name of Jesus Christ in Hollywood movies as a swear word.
I have not the seen the SSPX expend any energy whatsoever on James
Cameron's campaign to convince the world that Jesus Christ did not
resurrect from the dead. Mr. Cameron, one of the wealthiest and most
powerful directors in Hollywood, produced a docuмentary movie for the
Discovery television channel entitled, "The Lost Tomb of Jesus." This
sophisticated movie, broadcast to millions, endeavors to show that the
decomposing bones of Jesus were once held inside a tomb located by
Cameron's team of Resurrection-deniers.
Last I knew the Apostle Paul had nothing to say about gas chamber
denial, but he did solemnly warn about the consequences of
Resurrection-denial: "If Christ has not been raised, then our preaching
is in vain and your faith is in vain." (I Cor. 15:14). There is no
Church and no Faith if Christ did not rise from the dead. It would seem
that Hollywood Resurrection-deniers such as James Cameron are striking
at the very heart of what it means to be Catholic, yet resistance to
this diabolism has been neutralized. How has this neutralization come to
pass?
Against James Cameron's campaign of Resurrection-denial, the SSPX have
had nothing to say. Cameron's most recent New Age science fiction movie
"Avatar" is the highest grossing movie of all time. No Catholic boycott
was launched against it.
What the SSPX forgets, whether willfully or not, is that h0Ɩ0cαųstianity
is akin to the "smoke of Satan" which afflicted another and earlier
pontificate of unhappy memory. By embracing the Vatican's acceptance of
the revolutionary, modernist Shoah theology which has as its goal the
ascent of Auschwitz to the ontological position of the greatest and most
egregious suffering in all of human history -- ahead of Christ -- the
SSPX is breathing an infectious smoke which in many other respects
perverts its judgment and skews its priorities.
It has certainly perverted the judgment of Pope Benedict, who has
entered three ѕуηαgσgυєs in less than five years, wherein he encouraged
the assembled Pharisees to continue in their traditions. This papal
abomination in the ѕуηαgσgυєs is a symptom of a profound spiritual
malaise, undoubtedly emanating from the grave disorder that inclusion
of Shoah theology in the Church has sown.
About this horror, the SSPX is oblivious. In fact, in so far as the
evidence indicates, the SSPX has become a party to it. I draw the
reader's attention to an article published in the December, 2009 issue
of The Angelus, the official organ of the SSPX in the United States,
entitled "Saint of the Sanhedrin" containing grotesque praise for the
wicked Pharisee Hillel, elementary errors in the history of the тαℓмυd,
and a flattering fantasy about the Pharisee Gamaliel. The editor of The
Angelus has refused to retract this misleading and deceptive article
which would have been suitable for publication in the bulletin of the
B'nai B'rith or the journal of the Scottish Rite of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.
Meanwhile in Ireland the SSPX has issued a statement affirming the
"h0Ɩ0cαųst" that reads like a press release from the Simon Wiesenthal
Center.
No reasonable person expects the SSPX to join the ranks of World War II
revisionists and debate the forensic chemistry of Zyklon B in
Auschwitz-Birkenau. Rather, we are calling on them to resist the
modernist heresy of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity, which the Vatican, with
unprecedented lawlessness, has made a litmus test for holding
ecclesiastical office.
To the SSPX we say, since Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre founded your order,
resistance to modernism has been "your fight." Since there is no more
pernicious manifestation of modernism in our time than h0Ɩ0cαųstianity,
why then have you fled the field of combat under cover of anemic alibis
and whining subservience to the new Vatican theology which has
substituted Auschwitz for Calvary?
HOFFMAN is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated
Press. He is the author of seven books including "The Great h0Ɩ0cαųst
Trial" (1985); "Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare"
(2001) and "Judaism Discovered" (2008). He edits "Revisionist History
Newsletter" and the
www.RevisionistHistory.org website.
Topic: Auschwitz over Calvary: who cares? (Read 9007 times)