Author Topic: Are you going to vote? (Read 9179 times)

insidebaseball · « **on:** October 31, 2014, 09:13:16 PM »

I can't vote for the self-serving "Republicans", or the pro-death immoral party, so looks like I'll be voting US Constitutional party. What do you say?

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #1 on:** October 31, 2014, 09:17:39 PM »

The elections for governor and U.S. Senate in my state have essentially been conceded since about mid-September, if polls are any indicator. So, probably, no, I'm not voting.

Mabel · « **Reply #2 on:** October 31, 2014, 09:21:49 PM »

Yes, local issues and writing in a third party candidate.

Marlelar · « **Reply #3 on:** October 31, 2014, 09:23:48 PM »

I don't vote along party lines except to NEVER vote for a Dem. I read up on all the alternative candidates and then vote accordingly. Republicans are a possible but I read their material very carefully.

Not that I have a lot of faith in the process, there are too many scandals regarding the electronic voting machines. We don't have them where I live but I think votes can be tampered with in any number of ways.

Nevertheless I will be voting - hope springs eternal!

Marsha

PerEvangelicaDicta · « **Reply #4 on:** October 31, 2014, 09:39:18 PM »

The old me would vote the Constitutional party, but since coming to tradition, and to my senses, I do not participate in the evil of this Jєω manipulated freemasonic satan worshiping government. The choice you appear to have is an illusion.

There are so many reasons not to vote
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/orig2/non-vote-arch.html

but nowadays, most especially due to the worldwide electronic vote rigging cartel. Elections are corrupt through and through.

Much like Rome these days, we get the government we deserve.

PerEvangelicaDicta · « **Reply #5 on:** October 31, 2014, 09:41:57 PM »

Quote from: Mabel

Yes, local issues and writing in a third party candidate.

an exception to my non voting policy is this - local elections. Until I see evidence of vote tampering here, I will continue to only vote in local elections where the voter has most control and power. Forget state and national - predetermined outcomes for the Jєωs and freemasons.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #6 on:** October 31, 2014, 10:26:04 PM »

Not registered to vote.

Live in a very liberal state now. All candidates support abortion. Claimed that the
issue was decided in the previous generation.

OHCA · « **Reply #7 on:** October 31, 2014, 11:12:10 PM »

There is a very close U.S. Senate race in my state. I will be voting for the Republican candidate. The opponent will be more oppressive toward the end of an eventual rebellion by way of supporting gun control; will be a vote for Obama to remove yet more restrictions on abortion; is a female needing put in her place--this is only hitting the major points.

Folks, if Dems get Congress, an era of oppression previously unknown in this country lay in store. Niggerbama is a lame-duck who'll never even have to deal with mid-terms again. He will be hell on wheels.

Catholic Samurai · « **Reply #8 on:** October 31, 2014, 11:27:12 PM »

The Social Kingship of Christ is not on the ballot. I'm not voting.

jman123 · « **Reply #9 on:** November 01, 2014, 08:13:36 AM »

Straight Republican

Aleah · « **Reply #10 on:** November 01, 2014, 09:16:13 AM »

The democrat rep has commercials promoting Planned Parenthood and abortion as if it is no big deal. Yes, I will vote for the Republican candidate because of this.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #11 on:** November 01, 2014, 10:33:33 AM »

There are no worthy candidates in any of the elections in which I vote. I sometimes vote on local "issues" but that's about it.

Pat Buchanan was the last worthy presidential candidate.

Frances · « **Reply #12 on:** November 01, 2014, 10:57:01 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

There are no worthy candidates in any of the elections in which I vote. I sometimes vote on local "issues" but that's about it.

Pat Buchanan was the last worthy presidential candidate.

:dancing-banana:
I haven't voted for 26 years, the last time there was a worthy candidate in my place of registration.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #13 on:** November 01, 2014, 11:08:07 AM »

I am dead set against "lesser of two evils" voting. I cannot vote for an evil. Ends doesn't justify the means. Lesser of evils voters in essence say that it's OK to do evil to prevent greater evil. That's never been Catholic moral theology. Too many Catholics have fallen into that trap. That's why I use the term "worthy candidate".

Ladislaus · « **Reply #14 on:** November 01, 2014, 11:12:09 AM »

Alan Keyes wrote a great article against lesser of evils mentality. He's another one I would consider worthy, despite the fact that I consider him way too pro-Israel. But that I could overlook; with regard to moral issues, the guy is great. I recall one presidential debate in which at first he wasn't invited. Then he played the race card to get on. And he answered EVERY single question with a digression onto the evil of abortion. Plus the guy's boderline genius.