Thank you for the heads-up. This does not surprise me at all. The Archbishop's 'documentary' movie is not a biography at all, but an Orwellian re-writing of history whose principal purpose is to serve the current agenda of Ostpolitik with Newrome. Of course, it has to be a movie that depicts a Society that Newrome will find appealing, one in which the opinions of Newpriests in skivvies, woops, I mean civies will be depicted as respectable.
It's a costume party IRL, not a documentary.
The reality it goes to great pains to portray is the subjective reality of the current Superior General, and they spent a lot of extra money (much of which was contributed, as usual, by trusting Faithful all over the word) to achieve this nefarious goal.
It's another ripoff of the widow's mite, a sin that cries to heaven for vengeance, not a documentary.
It's dishonesty besmirching the good name of ABL, not a documentary of him.
This is a communist propaganda piece, not a documentary.
This is a motion picture screed, not a documentary.
Our opportunity to view it will be an opportunity to do more penance.
Only two kinds of people will enjoy this movie:
~ The ignorant (that means innocently so or wilfully so)
~ Those who practice penance well (and are able therefore to enjoy the good parts and truth of the movie while not allowing themselves to be upset over the aspects of deceit and treachery inherent in the lies and omissions).
Knowing what to expect and what to look out for will help us to avoid being so disgusted that we have to walk out fuming and sick long before it's over.
A series of hard questions needs to be compiled.
How can this be called a "documentary" when the first and most loyal choice of a successor that ABL had is nowhere to be seen in it?
How many other conspicuously essential elements of ABL's life are omitted as well?
Bishop Tissier de Mallerais wrote a very good biography of ABL -- why is most of it ignored or deleted?
Why are no subtitles provided for the words that ABL speaks in French?
Why would the annoying practice of having a foreign language (French) overstepped by a louder voice (in English) which ruins the experience for French-speaking viewers be used, instead of providing subtitles for everyone?
Why would it not be scandalous that the SSPX would release a so-called documentary of its founder which re-packages his entire life so as to make it seem like something it was not?
This motion picture screed is a scandal to children who believe in Our Lord Jesus Christ (cf. Matthew xviii. 6).