Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: AquinasG was banned  (Read 2329 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 29016
  • Reputation: +24792/-396
  • Gender: Male
AquinasG was banned
« on: November 09, 2011, 03:31:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Need I give a reason?

    It's pretty simple, actually. He was banned for trolling. I read over many of his posts, and nowhere could I discern a traditional Catholic position. This is a traditional Catholic board. So any fervent Novus Ordo Catholic HOSTILE to tradition, as aquinasG was, would only join a board like CathInfo to "troll".

    Novus Ordo Catholics are welcome to come here and ask questions, etc. and they will be presumed to be of good will. That is, until we see otherwise, as was the case with AquinasG.

    The definition of "troll" is someone who joins a board just to get a rise out of all or most of the membership, by taking views calculated to inflame passions.

    For example, if I joined a Democratic message board claiming to be a staunch Republican, or a Jєωιѕн forum claiming to be a neo-nαzι. Basically, trolling is a behavior frequently seen in teenagers -- those who are bored, who like to mess with people and get reactions from them. Those who don't have a life.

    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline St Jude Thaddeus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 857
    • Reputation: +184/-24
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #1 on: November 09, 2011, 03:53:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't mind arguing with a Novus Ordo person, a Muslim, a pagan, or whoever, if there is actually some back-and-forth in the debate. This character, however, would never concede a point even if he had already been shown he was wrong several times. He would continue to say stuff like " You still haven't shown me any proof of modernist thinking at Vat2" when other posters had long ago shown him the irrefutable evidence.

    Also, he wanted to twist and contort the writings of great Saints and Doctors to mean other than what they intended, and would not give in even when he was shown that those same Saints and Doctors had on other occasions spoken quite clearly on those same matters.

    In other words, he was a troll. He reminds me of some tedious jackasses over on Catholic Answers Forum who keep insisting that absolutely nothing has changed in the Church in the last fifty years.  :roll-laugh1:
    St. Jude, who, disregarding the threats of the impious, courageously preached the doctrine of Christ,
    pray for us.


    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8213
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #2 on: November 09, 2011, 03:58:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for banning him, Matthew. He definitely had no place on this forum.

    St. Jude Thaddeus, it's funny you say he reminds you of someone on "Catholic" Answers, because aquinas says he was banned from there! LOL.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 29016
    • Reputation: +24792/-396
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #3 on: November 09, 2011, 04:07:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • More evidence that he was just a garden-variety troll.

    On Catholic Answers, he probably talked up Tradition to tick everybody off.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8213
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #4 on: November 09, 2011, 04:12:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He says he made a comment about the NO that people didn't like, so you're probably right.

    He was also banned from Bellarmine forums a few days ago. Maybe he's seeing how many forums he can be banned from.


    Offline Caminus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3013
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #5 on: November 09, 2011, 04:55:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was going to tell him to simmer down and pick one topic to discuss methodically.  But he was too erratic and seemed to be virtually schizophrenic.  He dabbled in just enough theology and the fathers to be dangerous to himself, there was absolutely no formation in his intellect or coherence in his reasoning.  But he was certainly tenacious and prolific, almost as if he were standing by 24/7 with a ready reply, albeit one sentence non sequiturs or some other fallacy.  Very strange.  I do not think one should be banned for being an errant Catholic though, as we are firm and confident in our position; any novus ordo Catholic should be welcomed here in order to engage in serious discussion.  Constantly arguing with other trads gets rather old.      

    Offline Diego

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1277
    • Reputation: +4/-1
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #6 on: November 09, 2011, 05:06:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No shortage of evidence against him.

    I'm sure not going to defend him.

    Offline PartyIsOver221

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1238
    • Reputation: +640/-1
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #7 on: November 09, 2011, 05:09:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks Matthew.


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3895/-48
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #8 on: November 09, 2011, 05:19:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, thanks Matt  :dancing-banana:

    I don't know why there's been an influx of them recently, it seems. Raoul said there'd always been trolls on here- but I've never said otherwise. It just seems to me they've been here more than normal. Just coincidence? Possibly.. Hopefully we can get back to having good discussions.  :jumping2:

    I agree with Caminus- I'm don't mind NO Posters like SantoSubito, or others, as long as they truly engage.

    Offline Charles

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 301
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #9 on: November 09, 2011, 05:33:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • aquinasG went straight to FE and started a thread titled "website"

    His 3 posts so far on that thread

    "Any of you guy ever been on this forum?: http://www.cathinfo.com/"

    "Well there are some intelligent people on there, but there are a ton of errors posted on that forum. I wanted to have rational discussions about those issues but they started calling me names, totally misrepresenting what I was saying, and even called me a Protestant just for asking questions about the Mass. I tried to be sensitive to their sensibilities, because I was raised very traditional and I like the Latin Mass, communion on the tongue, old songs, ect. But I tried to defend those who prefer other spiritual elements and these people took so badl that they worked it out that I can't post of their anymore. Charity is primary virtue, so why does it appear to be lacking among "traditionalists" when people try to discuss their beliefs? Is it because they are a minority? Ironically, there aggresiveness s similar to that of African Americans before Obama's election."

    "Although i seems a more quiet over here, they don't have inappropriate features like the other forum, where you can vote on whether you like somebody, or want to ignore somebody. Its just not charitable.

    But I enjoy a good, kind debate. Do they ever get going on here ?"

    http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php/topic,3445943.msg33635858.html#msg33635858

    Looks like troll posting to me. He also has a thread going on sedes.

    And actually, both threads are against FE rules  :laugh1:


    Offline PartyIsOver221

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1238
    • Reputation: +640/-1
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #10 on: November 09, 2011, 05:35:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for the surveillance/recon work , Charles.

     :wink:


    Offline Charles

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 301
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #11 on: November 09, 2011, 05:40:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PartyIsOver221
    Thanks for the surveillance/recon work , Charles.

     :wink:


    Well he had to go somewhere to eat
     :ready-to-eat:

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8213
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #12 on: November 09, 2011, 08:58:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No surprise that he goes running onto FishEaters and starts cutting all of us down. Of course, FE is a joke anyway so we shouldn't care what any of them think of us.

    And I notice Walty, who used to post here (and probably still lurks here from time to time), says aquinas will "get a better response" at FE. Well, yeah, if you're a modernist you'll definitely get a better response at a neo-Trad forum like FE than you would here.

    Offline TraceG

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 126
    • Reputation: +69/-0
      • h
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #13 on: November 09, 2011, 10:53:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Amazing how often charity is improperly defined as playing nice and condoning error :fryingpan:

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4814
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    AquinasG was banned
    « Reply #14 on: November 09, 2011, 11:48:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Diego said:
    Quote
    No shortage of evidence against him.

    I'm sure not going to defend him.


    WITCH HUNT!  I see the mob has their torches out and are storming the castle!
    IGNORE my posts. I wrongly rejected the idea of "implicit faith" and the rhythm method, even questioned Fatima, and was briefly quasi-Jansenist. I apologize for all defamation, a disrespectful attitude towards Pius XII and other known Catholics and for posting indecent videos/articles.