Author Topic: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon (Read 18453 times)

MyrnaM · « **Reply #30 on:** August 22, 2017, 08:43:27 AM »

Quote from: nctradcath on August 22, 2017, 08:06:10 AM

Please give it Cassini. I am interested.

Yes, please as nctradcath requested pass it along to us!

Pax Vobis · « **Reply #31 on:** August 22, 2017, 09:53:10 AM »

Yes, I would like to hear more on Knock. As I pointed out earlier in this thread, a gentleman started a series of articles which tie Knock to LaSalette and Fatima. These can be found on the 'tradition in action' site (link posted already). It's VERY well done.

cassini · « **Reply #32 on:** August 22, 2017, 10:58:24 AM »

Quote from: nctradcath on August 22, 2017, 08:06:10 AM

Please give it Cassini. I am interested.

La Salette and Knock

As interpreted by a friend (of Cassini's) with some additions.

Heaven’s awareness of the freemasonic revolution against Christ was made known first to a French nun Sister Marie de St Pierre (1816-184) and then by her request at La Salette in France on Sept. 19, 1846, where a crowned Mother of God appeared to two children. Among the most poignant messages was that: ‘Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist.’ Three popes, Pius IX, Leo XIII and Pius X, approved this apparition, but the message was met with furious opposition from many bishops. It seems the Masons and some Masonic-controlled clergy already ensconced in the Church, must not have wanted any such revelations to be taken seriously.

Thirty-three years after the apparition, on 20^th August 1879, a basilica at La Salette was consecrated, and the following day, August 21^st, the Archbishop of Paris in France (representing the Melchisedech Priesthood and Melchisedech Kingship) crowned the statue of the Virgin of La Salette according to the prescription of the sacred Congregation of Rites. Heaven’s awareness, it seems, was given new impetus.

On the same day as this coronation, 21^st August 1879, as only heaven can co-ordinate, there occurred an active but silent apparition at Knock, a small town of Connaught in the west of Ireland (as in ‘To Hell or to Connaught’ – Oliver Cromwell). On a miserable wet night, outside the gable-end of the church of St John the Baptist, ‘dedicated to all the nations of the world’, there appeared a sight that included Saint John the Evangelist (Powers-Priesthood-Tiara), The Virgin Mary, St Joseph (Powers-Priesthood-Tiara), and the Lamb on an altar (Holy Sacrifice of the Mass) surrounded by angels, all bathed in a wondrous light. The figures, which stood a few feet off the ground, showed St Joseph - his head bowed, glancing sideways, isolated and separated by a mysterious black line noticed by at least one witness, and Mary, wearing a crown as in La Salette (Principalities-Thrones) but separated from the lamb on the altar by St John in full Mass vestments, with a book (the same book represented on the Masonic ‘Point Within a Circle’?) in one hand while gesturing in a preaching stance with the other.

PICTURE OF APPARITION SHOULD BE HERE. - SORRY I AM UNABLE TO POST PICTURES - PERHAPS SOMEONE ELSE CAN

The apparition at Knock cannot be interpreted by theological norms. Its purpose is allegorical, coming as it did in the wake of the attack on the principalities of Christendom, and the Papal States - by then replaced by Masonic republics, democracies etc - all now under the sole protection of Mary in heaven; and on the same day both Powers crowned the statue of Our Lady of Salette, and involving as it did so prominently both St Johns, it is clearly Melchisedech and Johannine. The message of Knock therefore, is for Freemasons, showing them that heaven is aware of the state of the world and the state of the Melchisedech war.

to be continued next post

cassini · « **Reply #33 on:** August 22, 2017, 11:05:06 AM »

Knock and Associated Matters

An allegorical interpretation as given to me

In 1879, on a miserable wet night, in a meadow field outside the gable-end of the church of St John the Baptist, there occurred an active but silent (i.e., the figures were speaking but could not be heard) apparition at Knock, [1]a small town in Connaught in the west of Ireland. The apparition, which lit the immediate area with a brilliant light, included magnificent images of the Virgin Mary, St Joseph, St John the Evangelist, the Lamb on an empty altar, it of course representing Christ and the Sacrifice, and some angels in attendance. This vision, mounted on an invisible platform on top of the tall grass, showed the Blessed Virgin, with her hands held up looking and praying to heaven. It showed a vested St John, superimposed between Mary and the Lamb, holding a book (the Roman missal - now redundant in the post Vatican II era, or perhaps his book of Revelation) in one hand while gesturing in a preaching stance with the other. St Joseph, with his head bowed and glancing sideways, was isolated, separated by a mysterious black line, noticed only by a few of the selected observers and seldom mentioned in books on the apparition.

‘Though the Knock witnesses experienced various emotions – happiness, wonder, devotion, exaltation of spirit, one being moved to tears – not one of them was rapt in ecstasy. None of them heard a word; neither did they receive any interior message or sign. That the Mother of God, who bade Bernadette pray for sinners, who had pleaded for conversion of life at La Salette, for prayers and penance at Fatima, should have remained silent to her devoted Irish children was, and still is, a stumbling block to many. There was no message, they say, so the Apparition is devoid of meaning.’ [2]

Of course there was a message. Heaven does not indulge in meaningless pictures, but few, if any, could/can interpret it. The main reason for this is because Knock was not a ‘Marian’ message but a Johannine one, and, like his Apocalypse, has to be read in an allegorical sense.[3]Thus a considerable amount of research on the place and its history is needed to begin to try to interpret the message or warning. So, we can ask: (1) Why Knock: (2) To whom was it addressed: (3) Why was it silent: (4) What was it trying to tell us?

Before one can possibly try to understand such ‘messages’ from heaven, one must fully accept and comprehend the war declared by God in Genesis 3:15 between the Christ and the antichrist, and how this battle of ‘Principalities and Powers’ is carried out on a temporal and spiritual plane. The message of Knock, we suspect, was, like the Book of Revelation, a warning to the flock of the current state of this war as it was in 1879 and into the future. Here is why we interpret it so:

Why Knock?

It is a fact that the only place where the word allegory is mentioned in Scripture is in St Paul’s Letter to the Galatians: ‘things are said by an allegory’ (Gal. 4:24). We also know that it was the Galatians who were advised that if an angel from heaven should preach a different gospel to that which they had been taught, to reject it. (Gal 1)

Scholars on the origin of European peoples tell us that a fair number of the old and true Galatians (Celts) had migrated to Ireland and settled here. Then along came Oliver Cromwell with his infamous reform in the sixteenth century, and ordered all Catholics of Ireland to decide their destiny: ‘To hell or to Connaught’. Choosing Connaught to hell, the Galatians Catholics moved into this desolate, infertile and barren west of Ireland where they continued to be persecuted in any event. It was their descendants that occupied Knock in 1879.

These then were the same flock that St Paul had advised that ‘things are said by allegory’, a people worthy to convey to the world a message wrapped in allegory.

A Pattern

Cromwell, that docuмented Satanist who conquered in the name of God, was the first to deliberately usurp the divine right of kings by purging his own in England and replacing him with the beginnings of freemasonic ‘democracy,’ where men and not kings subservient to God would rule the world according to their own laws. Cromwell, who committed untold atrocities against the Catholic Irish, was a champion of what he called ‘religious liberty,’ but this liberty did not include traditional Catholicism and certainly not the traditional Latin Mass which he hated, a policy identical with that pertaining within the Modernist Churchmen of post Vatican II.

The Parish Priest of Knock at the time was Archdeacon Cavanagh, a saintly man, full of devotion to Our Lady and her Immaculate Conception. Knock, a barren place, poor in earthly goods, but rich in grace and good works, was a fitting place for a message from heaven. In May of 1879, Fr Cavanagh began a novena of 100 Masses for the souls in Purgatory, the final Mass being said on the morning of the day that the vision appeared. Not known to many and hardly ever broached is the fact that in Mayo at the time, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ was active. It has been written that a group of Freemasons from Foxford had planned to ambush Fr Cavanagh and cut off his ears on the day he finished his century of Masses.

Fascinating and wonderful as the actual events of the sighting were, space does not permit a complete account. We can say the sensational events of the day saved Fr Cavanagh ears, but as divine Providence would have it this saintly priest was not to witness the vision. A reason for this could be to save the vision from accusations of being conjured up by a priest so pious and spiritual that the world may not have believed it. Instead it was to be witnessed by a group of people, of all ages, the likes of which could be found anywhere. Such a group could not be said to have had illusions, nor could a motive for any conspiracy be levelled at them. Great miracles later gave final witness to its authenticity.

To whom was it Addressed?

St John the Baptist Church had an inscription on the west wall that read:

‘My house shall be called the house of prayer to all nations. This is the gate of the Lord: the just shall enter into it.’

Knock then was a link ‘to all nations.’ There was also something unique as regards those that witnessed it. Unlike the Marion apparitions of the times, messages confined to one, two or three persons, usually children,[4]eighteen people were granted the sight at Knock, aged between six and seventy-five. Here is a second sign that the vision was meant for the special attention of all those that would heed it.

Delving back into history we find that in response to Cromwell’s campaign to destroy the Christian Kingdom of Ireland, the Catholic Ecclesiastical Congregation of the Kingdom of Ireland met at Clonmacnoise on the 4^th of December 1649, and issued a Motu Proprio, warning Catholics not to be deceived by those supposedly acting in the name of God.[5]Given the universal nature of a proprio motu, i.e., a message for ‘all nations’, we feel there is a continuity and connection between the three elements mentioned here.

Why was it silent?

In the plan of God for men, He set up many a hierarchy: one being a chain of communication between God, the Pope, a King, down to the peasants scattered throughout the kingdom. Such a link began when Constantine placed his kingdom into the society intended by Christ. Later the Pope would crown the King of the Franks with divine approval. The Pope would represent heaven, taking his authority from God Himself. The king would take his authority from the Pope and so on down to the common people. Rome in turn made provision for this hierarchy by providing a special place at Church Councils for those kings loyal to God, the Church, the Pope and his definitions, declarations and social instructions.

Responding to heaven’s challenge to Satan’s dominion, in a master plan from hell, the earthly Illuminati would devote themselves to eliminating this worldwide Christian society. To sever this relationship all one had to do was remove the temporal kingship and whole nations could be lured into apostasy just as whole peoples were Christianised through king and country. Breaking this crucial link between God and His people was the first step in Satan’s counter-offensive in the war of Genesis 3:15. What is not commonly known is that the Freemasons claimed complete victory after the First World War, a war, as we know, begun by a planned assassination. At Vatican I in 1870, only one kingdom; that of Portugal, sat in the royal box giving public witness to their remaining loyalty to God and Pope. [6]

"Two months before the invasion of Rome, Pius IX had presided over the final session of the Vatican Council. In contrast to the opening a year before, St Peter’s was almost deserted. In the royal box, there were two ladies, one of them the Infanta of Portugal (The royal title of the Kingdom of Portugal), as well as a decrepit officer with the Order of St Januarius blazoned across his chest. The diplomatic box, too, had many vacant seats. The Great Powers had instructed their ambassadors to boycott a function in which there was no mileage for them." --- Vicars of Christ: The Dark Side of the Papacy by Peter de Rosa ...

The symbolic end of God’s terrestrial Principalities occurred when the Pope had to surrender to the freemasonic forces laying siege to last of the Vatican states by raising the white flag of surrender in 1870, 40 years after Our Lady predicted the date in her message to St Catherine Laboure in 1830. Giuseppe Garibaldi actually sat on the chair of Peter vacated by Pius IX. The timing here was deliberate, for it interrupted the Council itself, preventing God knows how many definitions of faith that might have thwarted the freemasonic-led Modernists that were emerging at the time.

We interpret the silence of the vision and the fact that it was elevated off the land, neither of the earth nor of heaven, to the fact that the traditional means of communication between God and His people, that is, through the hierarchy between God, Pope and king down to the common people, had by then been eliminated by тαℓмυdic Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ. It is Interesting to note that the apparition of Our Lady of Hope at Pontmain, France, in the same year (1870) was also silent. In that case however, letters in the sand were provided by which the children spelled out the message. But there was no communication at all at Knock.

This interpretation is not affected by the fact that in 1917 there was a ‘speaking’ intervention between heaven and a multitude on earth, for Fatima is in Portugal, the last remaining kingdom present at the council, the one land where such a public communication might take place.

Now there may be some who would contend that the endless series of ‘Marian’ visions at Mudjugorje shows this assertion to be untrue. But Medjugorje of the ‘lying wonders’ is not Catholic and therefore is not from heaven but movies from hell. The ‘visions’ of Mudjugorje, if true, allegedly began on the Masonic hour on the feast of St. John the Baptist (June 24th 1981), the adopted patron of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ with its passion for symbols and secret signs. Satan, we know, or should know, will do whatever it takes to spread relevant error. In this case he has attracted millions of Catholics (and many non-Catholics) to this place, gets them on their knees praying, confessing, fasting or whatever, and then delivers to them a large slice of false тαℓмυdic democracy, ecuмenism and error. Docuмented evidence, as well as personal conversation with some that regularly went there and who found this out for themselves, has convinced us that there is on offer here from ‘the Virgin’, the hoary old freemasonic idea that all religions must be moulded into one universal religion, the ‘all roads lead to heaven’ belief, for we all supposedly have the same God. In other words there is a rejection here of the dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. This ideology of course flies in the face of Fatima where Our Lady called for prayers for the conversion of all sinners. With God there cannot be any contradictions, so faithful Catholics must reject all such inconsistency. The popularity of this place, with its supposed daily contact to heaven and its seductive nature according to the new order of Vatican II, is however enough to convince most to turn a blind eye to its heretical promulgations and all that supposedly goes on there. Such is the art of satanic deceit.

MORE COMING

[1]From the Gaelic word Cnoc, a hill.
[2]Mary Purcell, Our Lady of Knock, p.18.
[3]A form of exegesis thrown out by Martin Luther and one that is hardly ever found among modern Catholics.
[4]Lourdes-one: La Salette-two, and later Fatima-three.

[5]See, for example, Tom Reilly, Cromwell, Brandon Books, Dublin, 1999, pp.292-3.

[6]Had Ireland had a King, he would have been there also.

cassini · « **Reply #34 on:** August 22, 2017, 11:49:30 AM »

KNOCK CONTINUED

Allegory:

The next step is to try to interpret the ‘message’ of Knock. We must now consider the significance of the figures involved and the positions or stances they take. Let us first ask why the two St Johns are included in the apparition, one because the church is in his name and the other because he is included in the apparition. These saints, combined, had a pivotal role in setting up the greatest mystery of them all, the Church of Christ, and this is why Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, the masters of imitation and symbols chose the two, not one, as patrons when building their own temple to the natural son. Their presence indicates it is the Church that is represented by the vision (and why the instigator of their ultimate victory against the Church, the spiritually unprotected pastoral council called Vatican II,[1]had to be a Pope John, and a false prophet to boot, this could explain why any man elected pope would choose the name of an anti-pope of the past in Pope John XXIII? St John the Evangelist, who gave us the Apocalypse, is instructing us with his gesture, and the book in his hand is the source of this instruction.

Next there is St Joseph, a ‘son of David’, as we know from the Gospels, making him a Melchisedech priest (even though St Joseph never used his priesthood), and whose status was completed by divine Providence at Vatican I making him Patron of the Universal Church. Again we see the vision represents the whole Church. He, like the Lamb on the altar is isolated, almost ‘out of the picture’ so to speak, and this was confirmed when that black line was later revealed, separating the vision into two frames. In other words, the Melchisedech priesthood of the Church is here ‘outside’, just as the vision itself was placed ‘outside’ the Church of St John the Baptist.

Then we have Mary and the Lamb. Unusual, if not unique in an image of Mary and her Son is that in this case, like Joseph in the vision. who is separated by a dark line, the two are separated by St. John. Mary wears the rose and crown, symbols of those Principalities now lost. In other words she is now representing the lost Kingdoms, she being the unshakable Queen of the earth. Our Lady is looking to heaven, her hands raised as Advocate or Orante, that is, in the manner of a priest during the Canon of the Mass, pleading, as she does, to her Son to avert a great chastisement or calamity, like that to come, Vatican II and its aftermath. Separated from Mary and the priests of the vision is the Lamb, representing the Sacrifice, the Mass of all time.

So, it can be seen that within this scene set up at Knock there are a few aspects that dominate any allegorical interpretation. (1) The Mass, or the Priesthood, is the dominant theme; both of these are isolated, set apart in a manner. (2) The Message is being delivered by St John the Evangelist, author of the Book of Revelation, the Book of Prophecy; the Book predicting a great apostasy incorporating the beast, the forces of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.[2]So, let us now cross over the battlefield and take a look at the forces that Mary and Christ were fighting.

Snakes and ladders as they are really played.

PICTURE HERE OF THE MASONIC THREE HEADED SNAKE UNDER THE LADDER. THE LOWEST SNAKE HAS THE PAPAL CROWN ON ITS HEAD _ THE MIDDLE SNAKE HAS A KING'S CROWN ON ITS HEAD -- THE HIGHEST SNAKE HAS A SWORD HANGING FROM ITS MOUTH.

Now while the Church has never officially interpreted the apparition at Knock, the Freemasons, who know the state of the war of Genesis 3:15 far better than even the most learned Catholic, had their own image of things at that time. As you can see in the masonic illustration above, which has as its background one of its symbols of equilibrium, a balanced ladder, two of the serpent’s heads are held high in victory, one with the sword and one with the kingly crowns, depicting their victory over the Christian kingdoms of the world for all to see. The third head however, with its papal tiara, is not yet held high, for it represents the priesthood (and the Mass), which, at the time, as Fr Cavanagh had demonstrated with his 100^th Mass, had not yet been undermined and usurped. The battle of Principalities and Powers had been only half won, but the serpent was already wearing the tiara in expectation.

Knock, I believe (my grandfather and his family having been born Catholics in Connacht, making me a descendant Galatian with a right to read Knock’s allegory) (Moreover, I witnessed my sister in the 1950s being cured by a visit to Knock with my parents) is responding to the state of warfare of the time. It warns us of a pending chastisement, far worse than the Flood or anything of a mere temporal nature. St John was warning the faithful what was in store for Christianity and the world. The Melchisedech priesthood and the true Catholic sacrifice of the Mass were in danger of being isolated, removed from the faithful as a whole. Mary, wearing the crown that now depended on her and Portugal (the remnant), pleads with God to spare the world from the greatest of all disasters, the demise of the traditional Catholic Mass of all time.

Freemasons knew that attack the priesthood and one attacks the true Sacrifice, the sacraments, and most of the temporal conduits of grace, the very means of sustenance necessary for Christ’s faithful to hold the faith in every way. An attack on the true Mass then is a way to destroy the priesthood. If heaven was trying to put us in touch with the signs of the times, this vision warned of the collapse of the second target of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, the battle of Powers, the priesthood of Melchisedech, and that this would be done by deceit, when the lamb that looks like the Lamb, will in fact be the dragon that is, the Novus Ordo, just as the Protestant ‘mass’ was used to eliminate the last vestige of Catholicity from the Reformers of the sixteenth century. This vision at Knock can be said to be a warning to all the nations of the world, ‘to undeceive those in their ungrounded hopes and expectations’, as the Motu Proprio of 1649 said, that what may be done in the name of God is not always as it seems.

Could any words better describe the situation that emerged at Vatican II and which is now present among Catholics worldwide? Cromwell, it is said, destroyed more beautiful things than any man before him. Here again we can draw an analogy between him and Vatican II, for it surpassed even Cromwell by destroying far more beautiful things throughout all Christendom. Leaving aside the traditional Latin Mass, all the old devotions, the teachings, catechetics and prayers, the vestments, the priestly and nun’s habits and clerical cloths, we had in line with Cromwell a thing called ‘re-ordering’ whereby they destroyed great cathedrals and parish churches, abandoned millions of sacramentals and books, and have not ceased their destruction yet, still selling off countless redundant convents, religious houses, and Church property. Looking back on the vision today we can now get a better understanding of its warning, for it has come to pass, the destruction of the true priesthood en masse.

[1]Both Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI refused to give it their endorsement of papal infallibility.
[2]Five Papal Bulls have been directed against it by name, in 1738, 1751, 1821, 1826, 1864, and Pope Leo XIII would warn the Catholic world against it in Humanum Genus within five years (1884).

cassini · « **Reply #35 on:** August 22, 2017, 12:07:46 PM »

Post Knock

An allegorical interpretation of Knock can then be taken as a warning that the battle for the priesthood was imminent. Extrapolating backwards; signs of this final battle become manifest in the words of many men. In his book Pio Nono, (Pope Pius IX -1846-1878), E.E.Y Hales quotes the Freemason Mazzoni aspiring to ‘a new consecration of external right; a third world arising upon the ruins of two worlds extinct.’ By this he meant the arising of a nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr in the wake of the other two great Empires, the Roman Empire and the Holy Roman Empire. Speaking to the priest Lamennais, a would-be reformer whom Mazzini had hoped to recruit, he said: -

‘The condemnation of the Papacy is decreed, not by us, but by God, by God who now calls upon the People to arise and found a new unity, embracing the two spheres of temporal and spiritual power…In our epoch humanity will forsake the Pope, and have recourse to a General Council of the Church – that is to say – of all believers – a council which will be alike Council of the Church and Constituent Assembly…’

A New Council orientated

By 1889, the Freemason Canon Roca (1830-1893) was writing in his L’abbe Gabriel of a new council of the Church, the last one, which would modify not only the liturgy and the morale of the Church, but also the pontifical function.[1]Stanisias de Guaita suggested: ‘to use Christian theology with its esoteric splendour to transform and enrich church policy without anyone suspecting it.’[2]Roca responded: ‘My beloved brothers in Jesus Christ. I do not argue with any of your judgements. We are in agreement on all points of the secret doctrine (according to the writings of Papus), introducing our concepts into the teachings that Christ gave to the twelve and later to the seventy-two. We have no problems with the Protestant churches: our existing membership is the same as that between Free Masonry and the ѕуηαgσgυє; the only problem we have is the opposition of the Roman Catholic Church.’[3]Roca foretold liturgical anarchy under the pretext of restoring the original concepts:

‘I believe the divine rites and regulations of the liturgy, the ceremonies, the rituals and the precepts of the Roman Church can undergo immediate change through an Ecuмenical Council…a transformation, restoring the simplicity of the golden Apostolic Age, wherein we will adopt it to our state of conscience and modern worldliness…Make preparations for the sacrifice, a proper executed termination…the surrender of the papacy; to be lost under the sacred rules of the last Council. The Papal Caesar will be crowned a victim for the sacrifice…The theology of science, which the adult population is eagerly demanding, has replaced the mystical theology. They are hastening the destruction of the Summa Theologica and substituting the ‘Scientific Summa.’[4] [ the Galilean Reformation] A sublimely new Christianity, profoundly tolerant, truly universal, dogmatically defined in encyclopedial fashion… a universal order wherein all religions can identify God with humanity, which, before my very eyes transforms Christ into the entire Universe.’[5]

Pignatelli in his ‘Batailles Maconniques’ wrote: ‘Only in a theocratic society, having the universal character of free masonry, will it be possible someday to unite Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhist, Europe and Asia under the same ideals within a common faith.’ (p.29) [Remember Pope John Paul II surrounded by the Devil's religions at ASSISI]

And the Grand Orient confirms: ‘Free masonry will become the superchurch: the church that will unite all religions… We aspire to have no intermediary between God and ourselves.’[6]

‘Roca combined the formative elements of this new Christianity: “You must have new dogmas; a new religion; a new ministry; and new rituals that very closely resemble those of the surrendered Church in the same way that the Catholic Church adopted from the Mosaic Church, its dead Mother…Using logic and knowledge, everyone will become enlightened and the faith will disappear… science will rule the world; because it will be accepted as the same God as humanity [7]…In this hour, each of us has a duty to encourage the evolution that will transform the papacy, enabling us to put on the armour of new worldly spirit and scientific rational. Roca proclaimed the “conversion” of the Pope to the new spirit of the world… after which he directed the Ecuмenical Council to restore the simplicity of the Golden Apostolic Age of the Church.’ [8]

We are reminded in these predictions of the teaching of Maximus when he initiated Julian the Apostate: ‘Dare if thou canst to unite the truth of the Titan and the truth of the Galilean, and you will be the greatest man born of woman.’ Vatican Council ll, in a sense, managed to achieve this with great mastery of ambiguity. Traditional and liberal stances were so welded together in equilibrium[9]that anyone whosoever could draw any conclusion from any docuмent that he or she wished. This masonic ‘salt’ was then presented to the bishops attending. Reading the docuмents the vast majority of the bishops interpreted them as consonant with their own beliefs and with rare exceptions, signed them accordingly. The freemasonic ’feathers’[10]in the Vatican could now operate at will once the bishops had gone home and any perversion could be implemented ‘in accordance with the wishes of the Fathers of Vatican II.’ This in the East is known as the art of Sanya Vasa, the mastery of ambiguity.

[1]Jean-Claude Lozac’hmeur, Bernaz De Kar, De La Ré-Volution, 1970, p.145.

[2]Footnote, Essaid de Sciences Mandities, 1, p.159

[3]As quoted by F. Marsoudon, Le Temple, Sept.-Oct. 1946, p.34.

[4]Having already introduced Heliocentricism and caused popes to reject the sacred doctrine of Geocentricism, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ had paved the way for the great victory of Evolutionism over Catholic doctrine.

[5]Le Temple.

[6]Bulletin of the Grand Orient no. 37, Politique et Maconnerié.

[7]Reason over faith: Heliocentricism over Geocentricism: Uniformitarianism over Catastrophism and Evolutionism over Creationism.

[8]Fr Sanez, quote from his booklet 4 select chapters from The New Montinian Church, pp.20-21.

[9]We have seen the freemasonic ladder of equilibrium. To conquer the world, the тαℓмυdic Illuminati placed all things into equilibrium. All the sciences, politics and even history itself was pounded into equilibrium . The Rosicrucians (rose & crown) had as their motto ‘WE shall be the equilibrium of the universe.’ Coincidentally, Lucia, when describing hell shown to her at Fatima, said ‘There is no equilibrium there.’ What a strange word for a peasant girl to say.
[10]‘When two things weigh equally, a feather will tilt the balance.’ - Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure. Act IV, sc. 2.

cassini · « **Reply #36 on:** August 22, 2017, 12:22:53 PM »

POST KNOCK

By 1903 the chief of masonry in the Vatican, Cardinal Rompolla, Pope Leo XIII’s Secretary of State (who obviously was able to influence the Pope into two catastrophic errors, his disguised endorsement of heliocentricism in his Providentissimus deus on Scripture, and his encouragement to the French bishops to accept the new separation of Church and State in the democracy of France), was on the verge of being elected pope after the death of Leo Xlll. Sensationally, on the llth count, a veto came from the Cardinal Metropolitan of Cracow, speaking on behalf of His Imperial Majesty Franz Joseph of Austria/Hungary, who had a legal right to such a veto from an old treaty. It seems one Msgr Jouin, a French priest who specialised in rooting out Freemasons, found evidence Rampolla was Grand Master of a particularly occult sect known as the Ordo Templi Orientalis that was formed only a few years before the papal conclave. Martínez writes: ‘The OTO’s most notorious member was probably Alister Crowley, immortalized in the first successful novel by Sumerset Maugham, “The Magician”. Elected grand Master in 1912, Crawley proclaimed himself to be “under guidance of a Higher Intelligence” that was counselling him to “open doors on a New Era, that which was destined to supersede the Christian Era already in its death agony.’[1]Mario Rampolla del Tíndaro was able to prevent his secret from becoming public in Rome, so Fr Jouin had to seek help at the Austrian Court where he received a hearing. As it turned out they then elected an ex parish-priest as Pope, believing they could easily manipulate him in the same way as others. Fortunately the Catholic world got a saint instead, Pope St Pius X, and a true champion in his Cardinal Secretary of State, Msgr Rafael Merry Del Valle.

In his first address as Pope he reiterated the prophecy that can be interpreted from Knock fourteen years earlier: ‘So extreme is the greater perversion that there is room to fear that we are experiencing the foretaste and beginnings of the evils which are to come at the end of time, and that the Son of Perdition of whom the Apostle speaks has already arrived on earth.’ In his last address he said: ‘The nations, deprived as they are of the light of revelation, are no longer subject to the restraint imposed by the law of Christ; the nations, driven as they are by blind passion, are heading for universal disaster.’ It was he who in his encyclicals warned the world what the Modernists[2]were and what they had in store for the Church. The Modernists did take over the Chair of Peter and thus seduced the vast bulk of the elect with them. Finally in his encyclical Pascendi he warned of the ‘universal apostasy’.

Pope Pius X sought to restore all things in Christ. There was a time of peace. A stopgap maybe, but a reprieve no less, for, take it or leave it, whatever happens, God never leaves his flock ignorant.

1917 saw the Mother of God appear at Fatima, Portugal, the only kingdom left apt to receive an oral message for all the nations of the world. There, 70,000 people, believers, non-believers, atheists, agnostics, and even journalists from some of the world’s top newspapers witnessed a predicted miracle, one that was reported throughout the world. At Fatima Our Lady, after some frightening warnings that included the prediction of World War Two and its devastation, the rise of Russia as an atheistic and schismatic state, and the persecution and elimination of many Catholic nations, left a ‘secret’ to be read to the world in 1960. We know today that the Rome which the same Mother of God predicted at La Salette in 1846 would ‘become the seat of the Antichrist’, refused to give the details of the secret which Sr Lucia said can be read in St John’s Book of Revelation (the same message as Knock?). Pope John XXlll is reported to have said it was not for our time. Now to the psychologically entrenched the significance of the third secret is lost, for to them a pope’s word is enough to allay any thought that this would mean Our Lady of Fatima was not in touch with the ways of the world and accordingly her secret was always redundant. In other words, she, with her divine foreknowledge given to her by her Son, got it wrong, and Pope Roncalli had it right? In the meantime the faithful had been asked by Our Lady to do five first-Saturday devotions, because as Lucia said, of the five different kinds of offences and blasphemies against her Immaculate Heart. Among these were, (3) the refusal to accept her as the Mother of all mankind, and (4) any scandal which instils in the heart of her children, indifference, scorn and even hatred against her Immaculate Heart. In fact it is probable Our Lady knew Rome of 1960 would refuse to divulge her message. Accordingly, could any message be more relevant or shocking than one that a pope refused to divulge? In other words, the refusal is as clear a message as any that may have been read out, indicating a clear sign that Rome was already under the influence of that Antichrist whatever he or it might be. If the Mother of mankind asked that they be given a message from her for their salvation, and this request was refused, does this not fly in the face of that first-Saturday devotion mentioned above? Moreover, we now know a huge indifference in her message was the result of that same refusal. Such prayers and devotion that emerged from Fatima waned after 1960, and it is hard to find first-Saturday devotions at all today.

There were two allegorical messages at Fatima also. Our Lady said that without prayer and sacrifice ‘Russia would spread its errors’ and ‘Portugal would keep the faith’. Russia at the time (1917) was in the throes of the war instigated by тαℓмυdic Jєωery against the Catholic Czars. Astonished that the Tzar was holding on so well, Lenin and his Jєωιѕн troop were transported into Russia to begin the Bolshevik Revolution in 1918. Thus Russia fell under a тαℓмυdic dictatorship more atheistic (anti-Catholic), ruthless, brutal and murderous than anything ever before seen in history.[3]For example the Jєωιѕн Bolshevik purge under Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich that, between 1928-1932, carried out the liquidation through starvation of 10 million men, women and children, mostly Christian, during the Kulak extermination in the Ukraine.

So, what was meant by ‘the errors of Russia’ if not atheism and schism – the тαℓмυdic destruction of Christendom and Christianity? And what of ‘Portugal will never lose the faith’? It could be a reference to the last of the papal kings, i.e., a remnant.

In 2000, it was decided to give the world the third secret of Fatima after all. But what emerged seems to be at best an edited version constructed so as to be interpreted in a way that suited the Modernists. Since the election of the actor Karol Wojtyla as pope, the papacy has been promoted as a cult, all emphasis on the charisma and pop-personality of its occupant. The demise of the Church in every sphere is totally ignored and all attention directed on the worldly appeal of Pope John Paul II and his successors. [World-tours then became the main function of the papacy, catering to the needs of the world while avoiding any hint of ‘no salvation outside the Church. A recent reported ‘Since January 1962, we’ve seen at least 148 papal trips costing millions upon millions.’] Thus the ‘third secret’ could be rendered down to a prophesy come true, that the Pope would undergo an assassination attempt, which he did, and that all is now well in the world thanks to the intervention of Our Lady who saved the Pope and the future of Catholicism with him no doubt. In other words the third secret was centred round John Paul II. Fatima was all about his welfare, his survival, ensured by Heaven itself. The fact that we could have had another pope within a month was not an option; it was John Paul II or nothing. How about that for a boost to his image?

Thus was the true message of Fatima made redundant, and with tears of joy and relief in the eyes of the faithful at such a wonderful conclusion. All talk about conversion or hell has now been forgotten while Rome re-educates the flock further into accepting the тαℓмυd Jєωs as our ‘elder brothers’ of the Old Testament, while they spread their ‘Russian’ errors to ever corner and household in the world.

But back to 1903. What we must understand is that if Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ came within an inch of placing one of their own in the Chair of Peter one hundred years ago, they did not just disappear or become redundant in the meantime. No, one would have to be very naive to believe that, for it is their way to regroup and continue their efforts to destroy the Catholic faith from within. There is an old saying that no institution can be destroyed from without, without first being destroyed from within.

I HAVE MORE BUT ANY READING MUST BE TIRED AT THIS STAGE> I WILL CONTINUE IF ASKED.

[1]Martínez: The Undermining of the Catholic Church, Mexico, p33.

[2]The Modernists are the Judas(s) of today. While some are Freemasons and out to deliberately usurp the Catholic faith, others are guided into power by тαℓмυdic Modernism because they are true Modernists, driven in their belief that they can change the Church ‘for the better’.

[3]For example the Jєωιѕн Bolshevik purge under Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich that, between 1928-1932, carried out the liquidation through starvation of 10 million men, women and children, mostly Christian, during the Kulak extermination in the Ukraine.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #37 on:** August 22, 2017, 01:02:05 PM »

Quote from: cassini on August 22, 2017, 12:22:53 PM

I HAVE MORE BUT ANY READING MUST BE TIRED AT THIS STAGE> I WILL CONTINUE IF ASKED.

Absolutely fascinating!! Thank you cassini for this great piece thus far, continue by all means... if possible.

cassini · « **Reply #38 on:** August 22, 2017, 03:01:51 PM »

POST KNOCK CONTINUED:

This overthrow of Catholic tradition had its roots among the Copernican modernists highly active during the previous century. We have evidence to show the seminaries were awash with theologians and theses hell bent on replacing the Person of Christ with Christ as principle inherent in each one of us regardless of religion or creed. The battle of Powers was truly coming to a head. Christ as High Priest was to be ousted by Christ as force system, a force for the тαℓмυdic trinomial, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity whereby ‘love your neighbour’ was reconstructed to eliminate all ideas of spiritual salvation for him, only his worldly comfort and needs. Such a Christology would revolutionise catechetics, theology, liturgy, the Sacrifice and even history itself. So clever and brilliant would this false Christology be that it would appeal to the intellectually proud, and would be so cloaked in the name of Christ as to fool undiscerning Catholics. The scope for popularity based on this new Christianity would soon sweep the world, or so they knew, leaving behind all thought of that ‘hard and cruel’ Catholicism of the past. The 33-degree Freemason Vyes Marasaudon said: -

‘If there are still some remnants of thought, reminiscent of the inquisition, they will be drowned in a rising flood of ecuмenism and liberalism. One of the most tangible consequences will be the lowering of spiritual barriers that divide the world.’[1]

Such a Christology emerged with the likes of Teilhard de Chardin and Karl Rahner, and aware observers note that Vatican II is best recognised in the context of them and their theology. Ecuмenism and liberalism has all but swamped tradition out of Rome. Considering themselves as ‘the living tradition’, which they should be, they claim these same errors as legitimate, showing they have no idea what tradition is. At a general assembly of the Grand Order of France in Paris on the 3-7 September 1962, French Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ adopted Teilhard as one of their own. Grand Master Jacques Mitterand then made overt reference to the 18^th rule of the Cabbala, the 10^th century top secret mystical docuмent of the forerunner of the Freemasons, which states: -

‘Do not dish up to the Christian dogs their deadly strychnine pill plain, but wrap it up in a large slice of soft flesh.’[2]

There is evidence to suggest all subsequent popes to Pius X were coached by masonic influences. Giachomo Della Chiesa was a Capranica graduate chosen by the Freemason Rampolla as his private secretary at the Nunciature in Madrid. In the 1890s the Instituto Capranica was known throughout Europe to be a modernist stronghold, and continued in the same vein throughout the twentieth century. At the same time Rampolla brought in another of his protégés to become his chief assistant, Cardinal Pietro Gasparri. Archbishop Chiesa became Pope Benedict XV in 1914, and Gasparri replaced Merry del Valle as Secretary of State. Rampolla, it seems, finally got Peter’s chair, not personally, but by proxy. Pope Pius X, who did mount a campaign routing out the modernists, was hardly cold in his coffin when Gasparri was accusing him of encouraging espionage against his fellow priests. Pope Benedict XV, in his first encyclical[3]said accusations against views previously considered modernist were to cease.

Pope Benedict XV died at a relatively young 68 in 1922. Cardinal Gasparri declined to ‘run’ for pope, preferring instead to remain Secretary of State where he could use his enormous power to direct Church policy and perhaps even the next pope. His choice was the little known and unlikely Archbishop of Milan, Achille Ratti. Duly elected, he chose the name Pope Pius XI. This indicated an affection for Pope Sarto. Indeed many say some of his encyclicals read like Pius X’s. But he was, Martínez says rightly, ‘the first Pope to actuate what we now call ecuмenism…The Malines Conversations of 1924 and 1925 that drew sharp protests from the Catholic hierarchy of England who cited the decree of Leo XIII pronouncing Anglican orders to be “absolutely null and void.”’ Then the Freemasons put into action their plan to get Pius XI to do their work for them. Conspiring with Cardinal Andrieu, who was caught smuggling diamonds and blackmailed for it, they had him openly condemn the anti-modernist writings of that great Catholic Charles Maurras as political and a danger to France. Martínez writes: ‘Unable to believe the Andrieu accusations Pope Pius X1 ordered Gasparri to provide him with the Maurras newspaper for daily reading. What he was provided with, however, was daily listening to reading… After three months of listening to Fr Confalonieri’s version of Maurras’ articles read out to him at breakfast, Pius XI had had enough. On Dec. 20 1926, he issued a solemn decree ordering Catholics to abandon L’Action Francaise under pain of excommunication.’[4]What in effect had been stifled was the last attempt to retain the Kingship of Christ as an influence in French affairs. The freemasonic separation of Church and State was now complete, and the Pope had been duped into making any further attempts to interfere an excommunicable act. Maurras was arrested and spent the last years of his life in solitary confinement in prison where he died a martyr for his cause.

Martínez then records a similar situation in Mexico where cινιℓ ωαr broke out among Catholics and a Church hating government. Pope Pius XI wrote that they were martyrs. But the real power lay with Rampolla’s protégé Secretary of State Cardinal Gasparri. He schemed away with some bishops who had closed the Catholic Churches and fled the country leaving their flock without Mass or sacrament. In effect they robbed the Catholic army of their victory, conspired with the government, and abandoned the Church Militant making surrender the only option for them. The churches were then reopened to the execution-fire of the betrayed leaders of the anti-atheistic rebellion. Oh the shame of it all, and how the Freemasons have gotten away with it as far as the modern Catholic is concerned. Such then is the greatest mystery of them all, the unexplainable fortunes of the Catholic Church and its influence in the hands of fallen men; i.e., the mystery of iniquity.

The next pope was Eugenio Pacelli, Pope Pius XII. His family had connections with the Vatican since his granduncle Ernesto, a member of the тαℓмυdic freemasonic Rothschild banking firm organised a loan to the Papal States under Pope Gregory XVI in the early 1840’s.[5]His grandfather Marcantonio became legal adviser to Gregory and Pius IX, going into exile with the latter. Later he returned to Rome to help found the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano. Eugenio, as a high-school graduate, was put into the special care of the Freemason Cardinal Rampolla. He too was sent to the modernist seminary the Instituto Capranica, to which he remained faithful, even returning there in 1957 when Pope. In 1930 he received his cardinal’s hat and was given the position of Secretary of State. In 1939 he became Pope Pius XII.

The new philosophies were given a boost when in his first encyclical Summi pontificatus the new Pope insisted that the basis for government should be human solidarity. Long gone now were the days when the basis for government was from above with Christ as King. Human solidarity is of course a formula very dear to Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ once it is framed to their way of thinking. As long as Rome pointed in the right direction they would see to the means. In the 1940s Teilhard de Chardin was telling all and sundry how to be good Christians his way. Things that separated Protestants from Catholics such as their rejection of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist became less important than whether they showed affection for one another. Soon after Pacelli was elected Pope he persuaded his Jesuit friends, who had forbade Teilhard de Chardin to publish and lecture, to lift the ban so that a series of Teilhard lectures could take place in German-occupied Paris during the latter years of the war. It was at this point Teilhard told a friend ‘I have so many friends in good, strategic positions that I am absolutely without fear for the future.’

Considered by many Catholics as the last ‘traditional’ pope, Pius XII’s aberrations are all the worse. When airing their disbelief at the ideas of Vatican II and the abolition of the traditional Latin Mass around which the Catholic faith is forever bound, they are possibly unaware that Pope Pius XII is cited more often in its docuмents of change than any other pope representing that 1958 years of tradition. Suffice to say that his record on the important matter of faith and science will bear out the reason why. It was this pope who, while admittedly contributed a dogma and a wonderful collection of Catholic teaching for the flock, as is expected of any pope, alas, opened up the floodgates to a modernist interpretation of scripture when in his encyclical Divino Afflante Spiritu he gave precedence to modern ‘scientific’ methods as a means of eliminating erroneous interpretations of past exegetes. Thus Wikipedia can say:

‘To Pius XII (1939-195), science and religion were heavenly sisters, different manifestations of divine exactness that could not possibly contradict each other over the long term. Regarding their relation, his adviser Professor Robert Leiber wrote: “Pius XII was very careful not to close any doors prematurely. He was energetic on this point and regretted that in the case of Galileo.” Anticipating similar praises from Pope John Paul II in 1992, Pius XII, in his first speech to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (1939), included Galileo among the “most audacious heroes of research… not afraid of the stumbling blocks and the risks on the way, nor fearful of the funereal monuments.”’ (Wikipedia)

He also indulged in many lectures, allocations and radio messages that could be said to fall half way between teaching and personal opinions. Some of these on the subject of ‘science’ we can see were a disaster for scriptural exegesis and the doctrine on creation, which of course infects the crucial doctrine of original sin and the Redemption. On November 22^nd 1951, Pope Pius XII again addressed the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. The title of the Pope’s address was ‘The Proofs for the Existence of God in the Light of Modern Natural Science.’ What followed was an endorsement of nearly every evolutionary theory on offer at the time, theories that (1) conflicted with the literal order of creation and the geocentric order of the universe held by the all the Church Fathers, (2) Suggested theories that denied the biblical age of 6-7,000 years for the universe; theories that denied the global flood as recorded in Genesis and its effect on the topography as we find it today, and God knows what else. Here is one passage of his speech:

‘44. It is undeniable that when a mind enlightened and enriched with modern scientific knowledge weighs this problem calmly, it feels drawn to break through the circle of completely independent or autochthonous matter, whether uncreated or self-created, and to ascend to a creating Spirit. With the same clear and critical look with which it examines and passes judgment on facts, it perceives and recognizes the work of creative omnipotence, whose power, set in motion by the mighty “Fiat” [Big Bang] pronounced billions of years ago by the Creating Spirit, spread out over the universe, calling into existence with a gesture of generous love matter bursting with energy. In fact, it would seem that present-day science, with one sweeping step back across millions of centuries, has succeeded in bearing witness to that primordial “Fiat lux” uttered at the moment when, along with matter, there burst forth from nothing a sea of light and radiation, while the particles of chemical elements split and formed into millions of galaxies.’

But there are philosophical and theological consequences to placing the creative act of God at the mercy of science’s Big Bang theory.

‘Let us suppose, for the sake of argument, that we can refer “not improperly” to the initial singularity [the Big Bang] as an act of creation. What conclusions can we draw from it? That a Creator exists? Suppose still, for the sake of argument, that this, too, is conceded. The problem now is twofold. Is this creator theologically relevant? Can this creator serve the purpose of faith?

My answer to the first question is decidedly negative. A creator proved by [Big Bang] cosmology is a cosmological agent that has none of the properties a believer attributes to God. Even supposing one can consistently say the cosmological creator is beyond space and time, this creature cannot be understood as a person or as the Word made flesh or as the Son of God come down to the world in order to save mankind. Pascal rightly referred to this latter Creator as the “God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, not of philosophers and scientists. To believe that [Big Bang] cosmology proves the existence of a creator and then to attribute to this creator the properties of the Creation as a person is to make an illegitimate inference, to commit a category fallacy. My answer to the second question is also negative. Suppose we can grant what my answer to the first question intends to deny. That is, suppose we can understand the God of [Big Bang] cosmologists as the God of theologians and believers. Such a God cannot (and should not) serve the purpose of faith, because, being a God proved by [Big Bang] cosmology he should be at the mercy of [Big Bang] cosmology. Like any other scientific discipline that, to use Pope John Paul II’s words, proceeds with “methodological seriously” [Big Bang] cosmology is always revisable. It might then happen that a creator proved on the basis of a theory will be refuted when that theory is refuted. Can the God of believers be exposed to the risk of such an inconsistent enterprise as science?’[6]

Moreover his ‘brash meddling with the liturgy of the Church’ as one commentator put it, ‘his atrocious ecclesiastical government, and his unbelievably scandalous private and domestic activities[7], are so clearly docuмented that we should be prepared to defend the proposition that Pope Pius XII was the worst pope in the entire history of the Church.’^{^[8]}

[1]Yves Marsaudon, L’oecuмenisme vu par un Franc Macon de Tradition, Paris, 1964, p.26.
[2]As quoted by D. Manifold, Fatima.

[3]Ad beatissimi, Nov. 1, 1914.

[4]Martínez, op. cit., pp.48-50.
[5]And it was this involvement that ended the Church’s outright condemnation of Usury . When did we last hear such a condemnation? The Scriptures are explicit in saying the lending money for interest is an abomination.

[6]Marcello Pera: The god of theologians and the god of astronomers, as found in The Cambridge Companion to Galileo, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp.378, 379.

[7]It is said, and reported on as recently as 1/3/01 in the Catholic Herald, that Pius XII was given the ‘monkey gland’ treatment when gravely ill and made a ‘miraculous’ recovery, living on for a few more years.

^{^[8]}From a 2-page docuмent in my possession issued by the Briton’s Library. These Britons are however Sedevacantists and do not include any of the conciliar popes as eligible for ‘worst pope in history’ category. Had they considered the Conciliar popes valid, Pius XII would have been regulated as the fifth worst.

cassini · « **Reply #39 on:** August 22, 2017, 03:29:34 PM »

VATICAN II

Then there was ‘good Pope John XXIII’. His background programming can be gleaned from the fact that he, like Eugenio Pacelli, was a devotee of the theories of anthroposophist Rudolf Steiner, another freemason attached to the Ordo Templi Orientalis. Exiled by Pius XI as Nuncio to Istanbul, Mary Ball Martínez, who was a professional journalist at the Vatican for many years, tells us what the dogs in the streets have been saying since Vatican II: ‘According to the Milanese journalist, Pier Carpi, who claims to have absolute proof for the fact, he was initiated into Masonry, attaining, like Pius IX, the 18^th or Rosicrucian Decree. Unlike Pio Nono, however, Roncalli apparently never repented.’[1]There are many other sources from which we can glean some idea of the тαℓмυdic Communist/freemasonic domination throughout the Church in the world at the time of his election available today.[2]Martínez and others tell us that witnesses can attest to their seeing Cardinal Roncalli in the mid-1940s leaving his residence in Paris in civilian cloths to attend the Thursday evening meeting of the Grand Orient of France. When he was posted in France his association with Freemasons, such as his appointment of the Master Mason Baron Yves Marsaudon as head of the French branch of the Knights of Malta, caused a major scandal for the Pacelli papacy. How then, you may well ask, but are not supposed to, could Pius XII elevate such a man to the College of Cardinals, making him eligible to be elected a pope? The hard fact is that he did, he was, and on that occasion he even insisted on receiving the red hat from a notoriously anti-clerical Vincent Auriol, president of the masonic ‘Fourth Republic’ of France, kneeling before him as he was made cardinal. As to his rise in the hierarchy, well, L’Osservatore Romano, in an editorial as he became Pope said: ‘It was Benedict XV who, as he had done with Achille Ratti and Eugenio Pacelli, put the foot of Angelo Roncalli, whom we now know as John XXIII, on the first rung of the ladder that led to the Chair of Peter.’

Like that ladder descending into Modernism, the popes get progressively worse, and we are not finished yet. Roncalli, they keep on saying, was a stepping-stone[3]until the right man was ready for the job, Giovanni Battisti Montini. Like the Pacellis, the Montinis were also a ‘Vatican family’. His father, Giorgio Montini was a journalist and politician, ‘thick’ as they say, with Cardinal Rampolla. With such connections his son was guaranteed a fine career in the Vatican of the 20^th century.

At his coronation as Pope Paul VI, several American newspapers printed pictures of him with members of the тαℓмυdic Jєωιѕн freemasonic lodge B’nai B’rith, accusing him of even being a member. In his 1964 book Ecuмenism As Seen by A French Freemason, Yves Marsaudon, a prominent Freemason himself, stated: ‘The sense of universalism that is rampant in Rome these days is very close to our purpose for existence.’ One could record dozens more scandals but to what end? The man has met his Maker and He is the only Judge. We however are left with his legacy, having to watch as Pope John Paul II made John XXIII ‘blessed’ on the way to becoming a saint in heaven while the last vestige of the Catholic faith disappears from sight.

Vatican II did not just happen, an ‘inspiration’ out of the sky, as Pope John XXIII would have us believe. The Masons knew since the ‘Anti-Council’ of 1869 that only a new council based on their principles would secure the way to a final victory. Begun on the same day as the first Vatican Council, Dec. 8^th, 1869, Masons such as Victor Hugo and Guiseppi Garibaldi met for the purpose of planning a future war against the Church and to get it to adopt ‘the sacred principle of liberty of conscience’. This we know was achieved at Vatican II, a council Pope Pius XII wanted, but one the freemasonic curia deemed too early. As it turned out neither Pope John XXIII nor Pope Paul VI would (could) give their infallible prerogative to this council, an incredible thing for a Church ‘Council’, you must agree. The Masons, more than Catholics themselves, know that God protects His Church, so they knew any pope or council bent on usurping the Church’s teaching would have to act outside God’s guaranteed protection. This protection does not extend to the election of popes however, for here again while God’s Providence prevails God does not interfere with men’s free will.

It was Pope Paul VI himself, ‘the perfect imperfection’, who discarded the Mass of all time, the Mass that generated untold saints for heaven; fed the graces from God to billions, and taught generations how to know and love the teachings of the Catholic Church. In his Apostolic Constitution – Missale Romanum of Pope Paul VI, 1969, the Freemason Roca’s game plan for the liturgy became a reality. Rocca, having suggested a new liturgy could be accomplished by appealing to a restoration of ‘the simplicity of the golden Apostolic Age’, we find Paul VI saying: -

‘After the Council of Trent, the study “of ancient manuscripts of the Vatican Library and of others gathered elsewhere,” as our predecessor St Pius V indicates in the Apostolic Constitution Quo primum, has greatly helped for the revision of the Roman Missal. Since then, however, more ancient liturgical sources have been discovered and published and at the same time liturgical formulas of the Oriental Church have become better known.’

Quo primum of course, explicitly forbid anyone, ‘now and forever’, from interfering in the traditional Latin Catholic Mass. It read ‘and let Masses not be sung or read according to any other formula than that of the Missal published by us’ which ‘has been handed down by the Holy Roman Church, the Mother and Teacher…’ Given that Pope Pius V surely knew that future popes would follow him, we can ask was he in error to give catholicism such a decree; was he naïve to believe his instruction was immutable, or did he assume that as Peter, no other Peter would disobey the authority they swore to uphold? In other words, what credibility can there be in an authority that is dismissed by that same authority later? When Paul VI, with crocodile-tears running down his face as he signed the decree that opened the way to that new Protestant approved form of liturgy so understood by the Freemasons of the past as the means to cause wholesale apostasy, there was the ultimate victory for the Antichrist, for Christ’s own words of Consecration were changed to reflect the very essence of freemasonic belief, that is, whereas Christ said explicitly on that occasion, ‘for many’, Paul VI’s Novus Ordo has Him saying ‘for all’.

It was this Pope Montini who asked: ‘Who is Jesus? Who was Jesus?… a mysterious prophet?…a problem for exegetes?…Will faith finally succeed in giving a definite reply to that question which cannot be shrugged off?’[4]who instigated the final uncrowning of Christ as King. Under his orders there began a process that, by the end of the century, would leave the papacy impotent in the face of anarchy among bishops, priests, religious and the laity. Traditionally the popes took part in a papal coronation with the following words: -

‘Receive the tiara adorned with three crowns, and know thou art the father of princes and kings, to direct them on earth, the Vicar of Our Saviour, Jesus Christ, to Whom be honour and glory for ever and ever.’

Under the pretext of such a coronation not giving an example of humility and poverty, a case where the lesser good is being replaced by a greater virtue, Pope Paul VI permanently disposed of the tiara in open ceremony. This pretext however is outrageous. Consider if you will the many popes who wore the crown of Christ in absolute humility and unworldliness. Images of the popes wearing such a crown reach back to the very early Church. Montini’s true intention became manifest when he squandered millions of dollars in America, creating a new ‘papal circus’, where trips abroad were/are organised to include huge charismatic occasions of papolatry.

The snakes and ladder as they are in this year 2000

Where all this was leading to became even clearer when Paul VI attended a session of the masonic United Nations Assembly in New York on Oct 4, 1965. He began his address with ‘Behold the day that we have awaited for centuries.’ He ended it by telling the Assembly they were ‘the last hope for mankind.’ He then gave his papal fisherman’s ring to U Thant, and put on the Ephod of the Jєωιѕн high priesthood (pictures of which I have before me), a symbol once adorned with the world’s most precious stones, and which high-ranking members of American Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ wear today. No doubt the satanic worldwide promoters of contraception and abortion within this organisation had a victory party that night. Needless to say, to the generations of Catholic now blinded and without any love of truth anymore, all this was taken aboard as something good, something Christian. Then, as with the Copernican heresy, the usual legions of well indoctrinated Gnostic apologists set about to ensure the flock would accept it as such, coming as it did from the ‘Holy Father’ and that Council ‘guided by the spirit’. Oh for Clonmacnoise again and their Motu Proprio, warning Catholics not to be deceived by those supposedly acting in the name of God.

At the death of Paul VI the electors of the new pope were all Roncalli and Montini men, chosen carefully so that the revolution would not die. Of the 127 cardinals, Pius XII elected 19, 8 were John XXIII’s choice, and III were those chosen by Paul VI. Montini however virtually eliminated any possible traditional influence in the conclave after his death by barring cardinals over 80 from voting, ostracising 16 of the most senior cardinals. Thus one could only guarantee three ‘traditional’ electors left to vote for a new pope, Cardinals Wyszynski, Leger, and Siri.

Cardinal Albino Luciani was elected the new pope in 1978, taking on a double barrel name for the first time in history, John Paul 1, absolutely in line with the new order. On August 28, the new pope announced his contribution to the revolution. There would be no sedia gestatoria, the chair used to carry the pope, no tiara of course, no coronation ceremony and no papal oath swearing to uphold the three-fold papal office to teach, rule and sanctify.

According to David Yallop[5]there appeared at that time in Rome an unusual news agency called L’Osservatore Politico (OP). It was run by the journalist Mino Pecorelli, a disenchanted member of the P2 group of Freemasons who was ‘outing’ other Masons in some sort of inner struggle. The OP invariably carried scandalous stories that subsequently turned out to be highly accurate. Pope John Paul I is said to have received a list of 121 alleged masonic members of what the OP called ‘The Great Vatican Lodge’ which included mostly cardinals, bishops and high-ranking prelates. Among them was Cardinal Villot, masonic name Jeanni, lodge number 041/3, enrolled in a Zurich lodge on August 6, 1966, in the most powerful position in Rome, the coveted office as Secretary of State. Faced with such a scenario, Albino Luciani seems to have wished and prayed for a premature death. He spoke of ‘the Foreigner’ who would succeed him. 33 days later Pope John Paul I was dead and a foreigner succeeded him.

[1]Martínez, Op. cit., p.117. See also 30 Days magazine, Nov. 2, 1994 edition entitled ‘A John XXIII Update.’
[2]Such as Rev Fr Henri Mouraux’s, The Hidden, but Victorious Way of Free-Masonry, and Murphy and R. Rene Arlington’s, La Popessa, Paul VI, 1983.
[3]The idea of a Pope being elected as a ‘stepping-stone’ has always occurred to us to be incomprehensible.

[4]Reported in The Wanderer, 25 Feb. 1975.

[5]David Yallop, In God’s Name, Jonathan Cape, London 1984.

cassini · « **Reply #40 on:** August 22, 2017, 03:46:58 PM »

POST KNOCK FINAL

When Cardinal Wojtyla appeared on the balcony as the new pope his past suddenly became all the more significant. He was a Pole from the land of that hero Cardinal Wyszynski who made such a stand against Communism, the manifestation of Satan himself. The record showed Wojtyla differed to Wyszynski in that he favoured ‘dialogue’ with the devil’s regime. With the Modernists coming into absolute power at Vatican II, Cardinal Wyszynski became an embarrassment to them. Most full-witted Catholics at the time of Vatican II awaited that outright condemnation of Communism. They waited in vain, for in among the delegates was the phenomenologist[1]Archbishop Wojtyla pleading that no such condemnation be issued.

Once elected, Karol Wojtyla, the first non-Italian pope in hundreds of years, ‘ a foreigner’, gave notice that it was business as usual, talking the double name of those he considered the best popes in history, Pope John Paul II. Regarding Paul VI’s abdication of the crown of the Pope, he said: -

‘One may also recall that my venerable predecessor, Paul VI, in giving up his tiara, made a gesture that has not stopped bearing fruit for the Church.’[2]

Before any fruits could be counted however, the matter of that special position of the Catholic Church enshrined into the constitutions of those last remaining Catholic countries had to be resolved. Orders went out from the Vatican to every such nation that the Pope now wanted a separation of Church and State. You see the council’s Decree on Religious Liberty and its Decree on Ecuмenism precluded such a situation in the new era of тαℓмυdic ‘liberty’.

So it was, on Feb. 21, 1984, Cardinal Casaroli signed a new concordat with President Craxi making Italy an atheist State. In my own country of the Republic of Ireland, the home of Knock, a nation that was nominally 98% Catholic at the time of Vatican II, the elimination of the Catholic status of the State could only be accomplished by referendum. Nevertheless, under orders of Vatican II, the flock was deceived into an act of obedience that in effect booted out Christ as King of the Irish nation. The only fruits we now know were Satan’s, for today, 30 years after Rome separated Church and State and Pope John Paul II visited, Ireland now boasting of its ‘post-Christian’ future, has washed its hands of a scandal drenched Catholic Church, and like the other abdicators has abandoned tradition in like manner.

In October 1986, Pope John Paul II invited leaders and representatives of the world’s religions to ‘pray with him’ at Assisi in Italy. There he placed himself, as Vicar of Christ, on a level par with all gathered. With Pope Leo XIII’s words on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and its methods uppermost in their minds, many Catholics finally got the message that this Conciliar Church was ‘about the ruin of the Catholic religion’.

Rome today we know fosters this great тαℓмυdic freemasonic political equilibrium of democracy as though it was the system intended by God.

‘Not only does the spirit of democracy derive from inspiration of the Gospel, but it cannot survive without it.’[3]

Meanwhile in every such democracy created, and especially in those abandoned by the Church, faith in Christ and social morality has plummeted.

The freemasonic elimination of the priesthood progressed at a pace after Vatican II. Christ told us ‘by their fruits you will know them.’ Today we know the priesthood is in crisis. The Melchisedech role has been totally usurped. The story goes of a priest in ‘mufty’[4]after delivering ‘meals-on-wheels’ to a sick man, meeting a female ‘minister of the Eucharist’ on her way in with a pocketful of consecrated hosts.

With a 90% decline in vocations in Europe, America and Australia since 1965, and dropping still further as I write, without divine intervention the future looks bleak for the world. The number of priests still Catholic in thought, word and deed is diminishing. More and more the call is for the laity to take over the priest’s role. At times this call is accompanied with the assertion that the ‘Holy Spirit’ is leading us into a new lay Church. How compatible all this is to the masonic plan of ‘no intermediary between God and ourselves.’

With the Mass in ruin, the priesthood falls too. The abolition of the traditional Catholic Latin Mass, now replaced with a liturgy reminiscent of Cranmer’s Protestant service, and the Roman Missal discarded for a four-page parish newsletter, the very core nourishment for the priesthood and the flock has been removed. The Mass is now seen as a community banquet, so much so as to eliminate its sacrificial function and to obscure the Real Presence in the Eucharist. Indeed it is calculated over half the world’s priests today, about 200,000, do not believe in the Real-Presence at all.

Thus we see the aims of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ for the Lamb of Knock are well in motion. Certainly Rome mimics the Lamb by issuing utterances now and again knowing them to be traditional and orthodox, enough to keep the Catholic publications full of pious hope for the Conciliar Church, and enough to keep the pew-sitters psychologically entrenched in their camp rejecting always the word of those who in true Christian charity and hope try to stem the tide of Modernism. Think for example of the encyclical Humanae vitae. Pope John XXIII convoked a commission regarding artificial contraception, a matter well and truly already settled and condemned by the Church. What purpose then a commission? He already knew most ‘Catholics’ had by then rejected the Church’s teaching, so the whole exercise would generate huge interest. We see now it was to be a stalking-horse, for when Pope Paul VI reiterated the already condemned proposition, half-awake Catholics, who were beginning to smell a rat after Vatican II, suddenly relaxed once again, confident that only a true-blue traditionalist pope would dare to insist on the no-contraceptive doctrine. This brilliant ploy then enabled him to abolish the eternal Sacrifice and replace it with a Protestant rite without causing open rebellion among the world’s Catholics. Pope Pius X in his Encyclical Pascendi Dominici gregis, September 8, 1907 said of the modernists: -

To understand them, to read them, one would be tempted to believe that they fall into contradiction with themselves…far from that; all is weighed, all is willed. One page of their work might have been written by a Catholic; turn the page, you think that you are reading a rationalist. (D.2086)

Thus the art of satanic deceit, for pin them down on their modernist days and you will be quoted them on their Catholic days, supposedly traditional and orthodox.

If we move on we find in answer to a letter sent to Cardinal Ratzinger about a dissident French bishop, Msgr Perl declared:

‘Yes you are right. The situation in the Church is anarchy. If you expect an order from Rome regarding the above will solve the situation, you are in total illusion.’[5]

Years of infiltration by тαℓмυdic, masonic, communist and modernist religious have brought the Church to its present state of chaos and anarchy. Statistics show that in many countries, at the present state of decline, the Catholic faith will become extinct within the next 25 years. The Catholic Church has lost half a million priests, monks, brothers and nuns in the immediate aftermath of Vatican II, a mere 35 years. Church attendance is down to single figure percentages in some countries, with Holland for example at 3%. Two or three generations of Catholics have now been totally deprived of a proper catechises, the old catechisms having been replaced with a superficial spirituality which fades into nothing in a short time. Conned out of a proper understanding of the Catholic faith, tradition handed down over the centuries from generation to generation must inevitably come to an end to be replaced by a time of near total ignorance, confusion and apostasy. But even a blind man must see that Rome cares not one jot and continues on with more of the same, portraying everything as the beneficial ‘fruits of Vatican II’. There is however, in spite of Pope Paul VI’s infamous comment that ‘the smoke of Satan has entered the Church,’ and the fact that he did nothing about it except impose more of the same onto that Church, a huge propaganda industry employed in hailing the Council and the conciliar popes as ‘great’, and trying to portray an illusion that the world is on the brink of a new ‘Christian’ era. Moreover, they seem to believe it, from the Pope himself down to the remaining pew-sitters.

Most Catholic newspapers are privately owned commercial enterprises, and depend on Catholic churches to stock and sell their product. Thus money and not orthodoxy dictates their content. For years now we have seen how they present Catholicism and how they can censor and depress any criticism of the new order. This way they control the thinking of millions while at the same time generate millions of dollars for themselves and their pet causes. In the real world however, the hard fact is that no one cares anymore what Rome says. The Church is now redundant as an influence in faith and morals among the peoples of the old Catholic Kingdoms. Nevertheless, good men, with their false belief that freemasonic Rome and the modernist bishops must be defended no matter what the signs are, actually participate in this demise, and may as well themselves tear the bricks from that temple of the Spiritual Son.

‘Hear what the unjust judge says; and will not God avenge His elect, who cry to Him day and night? I tell you that He will avenge them quickly. Yet when the Son of Man comes, will He find, do you think, faith on earth?’ --- Luke 18:8.

This however is not to say the Church has defected. Its tenets still hold firm and its truths can still be found. Christ, we know, conserves with divine power the society founded by Him. It is, alas, like Him, being crucified by those incuмbents in most places of authority and power right now, but we hope, like Him, it will rise again to complete His work of redemption.

We see then тαℓмυdic Jєωιѕн Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is the temporal vehicle that has emerged to fight the battle of Principalities and Powers. Alas, it is a long time since Catholics paid heed to the words of Pope Leo XIII when he said of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, ‘Let no pretended probity deceive one.’

On January 3^rd, 1997, the following report appeared in the Catholic Herald:

‘The Grand Orient of Italy decided to award the Pontiff Pope John Paul II with the Order of Galileo Galilei, the highest form of recognition able to be made by Italy’s Freemasons to a non-member, in recognition for his promotion of universal Masonic values of fraternity, respect for the dignity of man, and the spirit of tolerance… Our intention is to pay homage to a man who, unlike his predecessors, showed himself to be extremely open-minded, rehabilitating Galileo, promoting a critical analysis of the Inquisition.’

The thing is then, or rather should be, that when a ‘Catholic’ newspaper can tell us that a pope, any pope, is about the same work as Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ (and Galileo, but that is another story), only a fool would not raise an eyebrow. I mean Karol Wojtyla, has after all, a great influence on the faith and beliefs of over one billion professed Catholics on earth today. There is no doubt it is John Paul II’s pursuit of freemasonic principles of ‘Liberty, Equality and Fraternity’ in the conciliar agenda of religious freedom, collegiality and false ecuмenism, which pleases them well. Add to this his constant apologies for the Church militant, those Catholics who fought the good fight against anti-Church influences of the past, and who are an integral part of the Mystical Body of Christ Himself, and we can really see what is behind this award.

That then is what Knock was all about. St John predicting it, and the Virgin Mary on our behalf praying to avert it. Alas, as with most prophesy, the truth of it cannot be fully interpreted as it is prophesise, during the time of its enactment, but only in hindsight. Accordingly Knock became a Marion shrine, generating grace in abundance, but masking the danger of the message behind it. Ironically, Knock too has had to endure its share of Modernism, but who knows; I have a feeling it has still a role to play in the future. What or how, we cannot say now.

God help us all.

This study was finished in 200 I think and put away lest it gave scandal. May God forgive me if it does. Given however that we have entered into a time when a pope like Pope Francis is in the Chair putting all previous popes that could be called modernist to shame, I thought it was time to let others read the history that prevailed from the apparition of Knock to the present day. And remember, it was the Virgin Mary herself who said 'Rome would become the seat of the anti-Christ in 1846, 11 years after Pope Gregory XVI conceded to Galileo's reformation and ignored the geocentric interpretation of Scripture, a denial decreed in 1616 as formal heresy, and allowed heliocentrism to be considered a truth of science, inferring of course it could be a truth of Scripture.

[1]A phenomenologist is a mode of philosophy that sees relationships as the worth of a person or thing. There is no Thomist reality in their way of thinking for everything is subjective.
[2]Discourse of Feb. 3, 1980.
[3]Jacques Maritain , as quoted in the Irish Catholic, Sept. 24^th, 1998.

[4]Casual civilian cloths, giving no outward sign of their priesthood.

[5]As recorded in The Angelus, March 1999.

Incredulous · « **Reply #41 on:** August 23, 2017, 08:39:42 AM »

Quote from: cassini on August 22, 2017, 10:58:24 AM

La Salette and Knock
As interpreted by a friend (of Cassini's) with some additions.

Heaven’s awareness of the freemasonic revolution against Christ was made known first to a French nun Sister Marie de St Pierre (1816-184) and then by her request at La Salette in France on Sept. 19, 1846, where a crowned Mother of God appeared to two children. Among the most poignant messages was that: ‘Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist.’ Three popes, Pius IX, Leo XIII and Pius X, approved this apparition, but the message was met with furious opposition from many bishops. It seems the Masons and some Masonic-controlled clergy already ensconced in the Church, must not have wanted any such revelations to be taken seriously.
Thirty-three years after the apparition, on 20^th August 1879, a basilica at La Salette was consecrated, and the following day, August 21^st, the Archbishop of Paris in France (representing the Melchisedech Priesthood and Melchisedech Kingship) crowned the statue of the Virgin of La Salette according to the prescription of the sacred Congregation of Rites. Heaven’s awareness, it seems, was given new impetus.
On the same day as this coronation, 21^st August 1879, as only heaven can co-ordinate, there occurred an active but silent apparition at Knock, a small town of Connaught in the west of Ireland (as in ‘To Hell or to Connaught’ – Oliver Cromwell). On a miserable wet night, outside the gable-end of the church of St John the Baptist, ‘dedicated to all the nations of the world’, there appeared a sight that included Saint John the Evangelist (Powers-Priesthood-Tiara), The Virgin Mary, St Joseph (Powers-Priesthood-Tiara), and the Lamb on an altar (Holy Sacrifice of the Mass) surrounded by angels, all bathed in a wondrous light. The figures, which stood a few feet off the ground, showed St Joseph - his head bowed, glancing sideways, isolated and separated by a mysterious black line noticed by at least one witness, and Mary, wearing a crown as in La Salette (Principalities-Thrones) but separated from the lamb on the altar by St John in full Mass vestments, with a book (the same book represented on the Masonic ‘Point Within a Circle’?) in one hand while gesturing in a preaching stance with the other.

The apparition at Knock cannot be interpreted by theological norms. Its purpose is allegorical, coming as it did in the wake of the attack on the principalities of Christendom, and the Papal States - by then replaced by Masonic republics, democracies etc - all now under the sole protection of Mary in heaven; and on the same day both Powers crowned the statue of Our Lady of Salette, and involving as it did so prominently both St Johns, it is clearly Melchisedech and Johannine. The message of Knock therefore, is for Freemasons, showing them that heaven is aware of the state of the world and the state of the Melchisedech war.

to be continued next post

MyrnaM · « **Reply #42 on:** August 23, 2017, 09:12:27 AM »

Thank you Incredulous for the pictures you added.

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #43 on:** August 23, 2017, 11:23:15 AM »

I just wanna add something to this thread...about the Nibiru thing...

Did you notice what WASN'T in the skies during totality? Nibiru. Notice what isn't on YouTube footage of Nibiru cultists? Anything out of the ordinary for an eclipse.

You might have people trying to post stuff on YouTube saying that they've got Nibiru on film or some such thing. It's nonsense. You clearly can discern that they are lens flares.

I think we can stick a fork in the Nibiru idea. I've no idea what Project Leak will do (or whatever they're called).

MyrnaM · « **Reply #44 on:** August 23, 2017, 11:50:58 AM »

I stuck a fork in Nirubu a long time ago. But I do believe there will be a chastisement sooner or later. I did read a few days ago there was a very large something coming our way on Sept. 1. I refuse to hold my breath. Seems there is always something coming our way.

Here is one of the more recent links there are several.

http://earthsky.org/astronomy-essentials/asteroid-1981-et3-3122-florence-pass-earth-2017-binoculars

Author Topic: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon (Read 18453 times)

MyrnaM

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

Pax Vobis

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

cassini

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

cassini

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

cassini

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

cassini

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

cassini

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

St Ignatius

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

cassini

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

cassini

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

cassini

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

Incredulous

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

MyrnaM

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

LaramieHirsch

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon

MyrnaM

Re: Apocalypse Ch 12: Sign of the Woman and Planet X - Nirubu - The Red Dragon