I am not a neocon.
I am not sure about that, given the other things you wrote in your response.
Are you a socialist?
No, but I find it strange that that was your first question after establishing that you're not a neocon. Are you a capitalist ?
I am not a member of the US military - though I do not see how that is a bad thing.
Swearing an oath to defend Freemasonic principles in order to knowingly fight for a country whose foreign policy and raison d'être is contrary to the Social Kingship of Christ is certainly problematic for a Catholic. I also find the US military's general ethos to be strongly Protestant, pietistic, and empiricist in nature, such that I could never recommend that anybody join it. Even if we were to exclude the question of Masonic and heretical Americanist principles, the ethos itself does not seem to foster a Catholic mindset.
It does preserve some natural goods, of course, I admit. But those goods are mixed into a body of error and an unlawful tradition (unlawful, that is, according to the Law of Nations, which the liberal governments and countries transgress through their continued disobedience to Our Lord, the Roman Pontiff, and to lawfully constituted sovereign authority in general and in particular, namely the lawful Christian Kings) that socialises young men into a fraternity of anti-Catholic images, mentalities, associations.
Do you support the Palestinian cause?
I do not support the Zionist cause and I think that the Palestinians rightfully defend their own land from unjust aggressive invasion, though of course I do not support the Mohammedans' ambitions nor many of their methods. That being said, the Holy Places need to be ruled by a Catholic order. Anything less is an objective sacrilege.
I am neither a globalist nor a Zionist.
I am not sure about that. Why did you immediately ask if I was a socialist and if I supported the "Palestinian cause" ?
Watch were you point that finger.
I am.
I did give the warning that the sites I suggested supported Zionism.
It appeared more like a footnote than a warning, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt unless I have good reason to do otherwise.
I do have family ties to the Middle East & an understanding of the culture.
The "Middle East" is a very diverse place. There's Anatolia, the Caucausus, the Iranian Plateau, the Maghreb, the Levant, Mesopotamia, the Arabian Peninsula, the Gulf, Egypt and Libya, Central Asia, Pakistan. And then there are Christians, Mohammedans (of many stripes), Eastern Orthodox, Protestants, Copts, Armenian schismatics, Druze, and many other things. I don't think that being Pakistani means one necessarily has meaningful insight into Turkey, nor does being Jordanian Melkite mean that one has much insight into Morocco and Afghanistan, etc.
To understand the situation in the Middle East, one has to acquire knowledge about Islam.
Yes, of course.
Robert Spencer does a good job exposing Islam, regardless of support of Zionism or not, as Spencer references the Koran, Hadiths etc. Spencer does not push any religion, but has a Christian perspective.
I am wary of anybody who simply says that he has "exposed" "Islam" without making the necessary distinctions. I am also suspicious of somebody's "Christian perspective" if they support Israel. Does Robert Spencer ever talk about "human rights" or something being "Judaeo-Christian" ?