+JMJ+
Response #1: The Bible does not make the Church; the Church makes the Bible. It is HER prerogative to determine what is or isn't in the Canon (although it is almost universally considered permanently closed). It is also the Church's prerogative to translate from the extant manuscripts into acceptable vernacular versions.
Response #2: The Bible was not written in Aramaic. The manuscripts that are extant are written in Hebrew (OT) and koine (common) Greek. There is evidence that there were once copies of St. Matthew's Gospel in Hebrew, but those copies would not have been widely circulated, as Greek was the common language of commerce in those days, much as English is so widely used today.
The fact is that no one can argue against the existence and logical necessity of one visible, authoritative Church in history. There would have been no "reformation" without a target that needed reform. There would be no "Protestants" without someone or something to protest against.
Anyone who wants to level accusations at the Church like "edit[ed] the Bible" or any other seemingly iron-fisted despotism simply needs to admit that if the Church Universal reflected the fractured, acrimonious and selfish nature of their Protestant organizations, there would have been no Bible and no evangelization to begin with.
It's pathetic to listen to people who really think that somehow the Church has gotten bigger and more monolithic (and thus. allegedly, more 'evil'). Rather, Our Mother the Church has had to watch centuries of stubborn, prideful and wicked children playing in their own filth rather than submitting to Her care.
Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!
St. Ignatius of Loyola, pray for us.
Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us.