Author Topic: And Now, The Erotic Liturgy (Read 669 times)

Augstine Baker · « **on:** August 08, 2012, 12:35:26 AM »

A Nassau-Hessian ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Pastor: "We are crying for God with desire."

Wiesbadent (kath.net/idea) In order to make a powerful media echo, about 200 [Mostly over 60] visitors packed a church to have an "erotic Liturgy" on the 5th of August in the Wiesbaden city district of Mainz-Kastel. It was held under the motto, "In the Vineyard of Love". Numerous media reported about the service in the internet editions, by "Frankfurter Rundschau", the "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung", the "Suddeutsche Zeitung", "Die Welt", "Stern", "Focus" and of course "Der Spiegel".

Edit: The local was unimpressed, but the pastor's language is quite deplorable and odd. Why should people be subjected to this sort of thing?

http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2012/08/and-now-erotic-liturgy.html

Belloc · « **Reply #1 on:** August 08, 2012, 01:21:40 PM »

I can smell that springtime of V2, smells like rotten fish mingled with carcass decay.....mingled with, heck ,you get me.... :shocked:

Nylndech · « **Reply #2 on:** August 08, 2012, 08:36:23 PM »

is priests fault not NO fault

did bishop even green light it maybe not

such thing would not fly in many other NO dioceses guaranteed

not sure why things going against NO rubrics mean that its NO or V2 fault

Sigismund · « **Reply #3 on:** August 08, 2012, 09:09:37 PM »

Fortunately, this fellow is not a priest. He is a Lutheran. No sacraments were harmed in the making of this "Liturgy".

Belloc · « **Reply #4 on:** August 09, 2012, 07:52:36 AM »

Quote from: Nylndech

is priests fault not NO fault

did bishop even green light it maybe not

such thing would not fly in many other NO dioceses guaranteed

not sure why things going against NO rubrics mean that its NO or V2 fault

just because V2 or NO has no statement "you shall do this" or not, there is an unwritten set of rules to interpret and carry out.

Fr. McLucas had a good talk on this, noted that what is important is not often what is said, but left unsaid or implied......

If this was a SSPX/SV, etc group-think this would fly? or in most Catholic nations prior to 1960's?

Belloc · « **Reply #5 on:** August 09, 2012, 07:53:24 AM »

Quote from: Sigismund

Fortunately, this fellow is not a priest. He is a Lutheran. No sacraments were harmed in the making of this "Liturgy".

gives scandal, but true, a fake service......likely, some liberal NO clergy/laity would take this up, as post 1962, everyone wants to act Protestant.......and accept their innovations....

Nylndech · « **Reply #6 on:** August 09, 2012, 10:47:01 AM »

Quote from: Belloc

Quote from: Nylndech
is priests fault not NO fault

did bishop even green light it maybe not

such thing would not fly in many other NO dioceses guaranteed

not sure why things going against NO rubrics mean that its NO or V2 fault

just because V2 or NO has no statement "you shall do this" or not, there is an unwritten set of rules to interpret and carry out.

Fr. McLucas had a good talk on this, noted that what is important is not often what is said, but left unsaid or implied......

If this was a SSPX/SV, etc group-think this would fly? or in most Catholic nations prior to 1960's?

an undisciplined SSPX or SSPX priest might very well do this

but first the priest might consider his parish

would his parish attend?

probly not

NO priests dont want to rock the boat or else parish will disappear

so they let things slide so the people get what they want

or they throw them a bone

in this case literally

but then doesnt take much to drive NO parish away