TKGS: When I read the title of this thread I thought of the validity of a NO Sacrament of Marriage. It is my understanding that there were no changes to this Sacrament. However, I do doubt now whether we received the Body and Blood of our Lord at our Mass. I tend to believe that the priest who confected the Eucharist was ordained by a valid bishop, but I guess there will always a bit of doubt about his ordination.
Actually, there are various "forms" that the couple can choose for a wedding. One of which is the "traditional form" which is largely the same. The actual words used (i.e., the sacramental form) used in the new "traditional form" are basically the same as in the true traditional form, but many of the ceremony surrounding the sacramental form have changed even using the new "traditional form".
The priest gave us a booklet which contained a number of options which, sadly, I no longer have. But there were a number of different options for both wedding Masses (Novus Ordo, of course) and a wedding without a Mass.
The Conciliar sect did not leave any of the sacraments alone.