Author Topic: ALL MEMBERS READ THIS (Read 201983 times)

Belloc · « **Reply #25 on:** February 08, 2010, 11:31:57 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: fkpagnanelli
Quote from: Matthew
There are no formal heretics present on CathInfo; and (with few exceptions) none that still need to convert to Catholicism.

...

God bless,

Matthew

I also reject the above for the same aforementioned reasons, and I do not accept your "God bless", since you worship a different "god" than I.

The Catholic God, whom I worship, seeks Truth before communion.

You're banned, FKPagnanelli.

Go convert heretics somewhere else.

Enjoy your "Home Alone Catholic Faith: population 5".

Hopefully, before you die, you won't fall into bitter despair and give up the Faith entirely, and proceed to embrace the most base of human pleasures. It could happen. It has happened before.

Don't think that the devil tempts every man the same way. He wouldn't tempt YOU to gluttony, perhaps, but he WOULD tempt you to excessive fasting, so that eventually you give up mortification entirely and end up worse than you started. You need to understand how the devil works.

May God grant you the grace to overcome your errors and pride.

Matthew

:applause: :applause:

Matthew 1, FK 0........now raoul will be number #2 man for CM to ally with......a return to normalcy...sorta

Dulcamara · « **Reply #26 on:** February 08, 2010, 11:44:07 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

Ok, ok -- no need to be so dramatic. I wrote this thing last night. I figured I'd have to revise it a couple times.

The declaration now reads:

The majority of CathInfo members are Catholics trying to save their souls to the best of their ability, during this Crisis in the Church which is serious beyond precedent. This majority consists of members of Christ's Mystical Body, who possess the One True Faith which leads to salvation.

There are no formally excommunicated persons (or vitandi) present on CathInfo to the best of my knowledge; and (with few exceptions) none that still need to convert to Catholicism.

I will not impose (i.e., require as as prerequisite for membership in the Catholic Church) dogmas that do not exist: including, but not limited to, positions regarding: past popes, Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood, Natural Family Planning, and Fatima.

Now THAT, I can put my name to, definitely. Thank you for clarifying it. (And sorry for being a pain.)

:dancing:

roscoe · « **Reply #27 on:** February 08, 2010, 01:25:36 PM »

Matthew's prev remark above that there is a crisis in the Church without precedent is indicative of the phony sspx logic. Matthew has also claimed that he is not in the business of judging Popes and then proceeds to call Peter De Luna an anti-pope which acc to von Pastor this is not even true.

If Peter De Luna or anyone else is an anti-pope and the situation now in the Church is a crisis without precedent, then by this thinking, the v2 popes would have to be anti-popes because the crisis in the Church is again without precedent making the situation in Matthew's own words worse than the De Luna dilema. If it is now worse than the De Luna which is called anti-pope how can the v2 imposters not be the same????

This is why the phony sspx is double minded and we all know that the Roman Catholic Bible says that a double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

All further cracks re:MJ will be met with a defense!! Ciao

Matthew · « **Reply #28 on:** February 08, 2010, 01:33:42 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

Matthew's prev remark above that there is a crisis in the Church without precedent is indicative of the phony sspx logic. Matthew has also claimed that he is not in the business of judging Popes and then proceeds to call Peter De Luna an anti-pope which acc to von Pastor this is not even true.

If Peter De Luna or anyone else is an anti-pope and the situation now in the Church is a crisis without precedent, then by this thinking, the v2 popes would have to be anti-popes because the crisis in the Church is again without precedent making the situation in Matthew's own words worse than the De Luna dilema. If it is now worse than the De Luna which is called anti-pope how can the v2 imposters not be the same????

This is why the phony sspx is double minded and we all know that the Roman Catholic Bible says that a double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

All further cracks re:MJ will be met with a defense!! Ciao

I don't think your "logic" is exactly water-tight, Roscoe.

Maybe someone else with more time than I have could dissect it.

Matthew

Jamie · « **Reply #29 on:** February 08, 2010, 01:43:43 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

Matthew's prev remark above that there is a crisis in the Church without precedent is indicative of the phony sspx logic. Matthew has also claimed that he is not in the business of judging Popes and then proceeds to call Peter De Luna an anti-pope which acc to von Pastor this is not even true.

If Peter De Luna or anyone else is an anti-pope and the situation now in the Church is a crisis without precedent, then by this thinking, the v2 popes would have to be anti-popes because the crisis in the Church is again without precedent making the situation in Matthew's own words worse than the De Luna dilema. If it is now worse than the De Luna which is called anti-pope how can the v2 imposters not be the same????

This is why the phony sspx is double minded and we all know that the Roman Catholic Bible says that a double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

All further cracks re:MJ will be met with a defense!! Ciao

Von Pastor is wrong. Here is the Catholic Encyclopedia article on the subject.

De Luna was an anti-pope.