Young people need to know their place in all societies. It's kind of a marker of advanced civilization. If the kids can't take criticism, it's the beginning of anarchy.
Let's look at what he said:
Your complete selling out to all of the insidious bullshit that your generation convinced itself was good and true.
A mind like this thinks that, when it comes to race, no one knew jack squat about race until the civil rights era of the United States. Only when the communist whoremonger Martin Luther King Jr. came along with a legion of activists in tow--ONLY THEN did people finally figure out how it really was, and what the truth truly is. ... hippie-era white guilt can talk about race.
Meanwhile, relics like you will mumble on and generalize about how such people who dare to talk about .... or whatever else your Dennis Hopper-era brainwashing compels you to think.
Personally, by what he has written, we can see that this young man has learned no respect for adults. He has no control over his emotions, and his vocabulary is so lacking that he has to use curse words. Now let us analyze his position:
He is saying that the generation of his parents ALL sold out to the insidious lies that they convinced themselves was good and true.
Now, I could say the same about his generation, for if anything, the selling out to the insidious lies has advanced at an even faster pace. Let us look at two of the revolutionary changes which occurred in the 1960's and compare the reaction from "his " generation (I estimate he is 35 and his parents in their late 50's and 60's.
When I say "he", it is about his generation and not him personally.).
MoralityHis parents generation went for
immorality: "free love" while single, few if any children in marriage, and later in life divorce, free love again and re-marriage...
His generation is doing the same thing except all the above behavior is considered normal, and now even ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is no big deal.
Catholic Faith (we are talking in general here, about a generation)
His parents went to Catholic school, their parents (his grandparents) did as was always done, they left it to the school to teach the children. The schools taught the children revolution. The children (his parents) lost the faith and passed nothing on to him.
His generation has no faith. Whereas his grandparents had it, the revolution of the 60's caught them unawares, and their children (his parents) were the victims.
Bottom line, both generations are no different in the end, they b oth lost the faith.
The question comes, then, why should I listen to my parents about these two subjects, they were fooled by all this, and still are. This is true. IF his parents learned nothing from their experience.
However, if his parents fell and learned by their mistakes, they have real world experience, and likely know more about how to help their child than most anyone out there. After all, no one knows and cares more about children than their own parents. Mary Magdalen was a prostitute that converted (experience). St. Augustine lived with women out of wedlock and had a child with one before he converted (experience). It is no secret that most people learn what they know from their mistakes. So, why should we dismiss someone because they fell in the 1960's?
Then of course, there are many people who never fell, likely they learned from other peoples mistakes.
Put it all together, and you learn that this is not about one generation versus another, for both the generations failed in the same exact way. The older generation were fooled because the revolution came out of nowhere. The younger generation the 35-40 year old today, have someone around with experience to open their eyes.
This is not about generations, this is about individuals.