Author Topic: A reply to the calumny being posted against Hoffman at Fisheaters (Read 1534 times)

sedetrad · « **on:** February 17, 2009, 06:23:49 PM »

Hoffman on "White Supremacy"
The white race --at least in its current degenerate state as manifested in modern America-- is now the golem of the rabbis. Without the unstinting financial and military support of America's white leaders and white voters, the Israeli Zionists would not have one-tenth their power in the world today.

As Dr. Tony Martin, professor of African History at Wellesley College elucidated in his lecture The Judaic Role in the Black Slave Trade, the root of anti-black racism is found in the Midrashic exegesis concerning Noah's son, Ham. This insidious rabbinic doctrine in turn influenced Freemasons and masonic sympathizers within and outside the Ku Klux Klan (most notably Wesley Swift of "Seedline Identity"), who taught the specious dogma that there is a Biblical basis for anti-black racism, when in fact anti-black racism emanates from the rabbis of Judaism, including the "greatest of them all" Maimonides, and not the Patriarchs of the Old Testament.

The supremacy of whites in America such as George W. Bush, Donald Rumsefeld, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, George Bush Sr., Justice Antonin Scalia, the Speaker of the House, the Senate Majority Leader, the Governor of New York etc. is synonymous with the rise of Judaic supremacy. I repudiate white supremacy and Judaic supremacy with every ounce of my being.

sedetrad · « **Reply #1 on:** February 17, 2009, 06:24:24 PM »

That forum gets sicker and sicker as the days go forward.

sedetrad · « **Reply #2 on:** February 17, 2009, 06:25:21 PM »

They are calling Hoffman a Traditional Catholic that attends the SSPX a WHITE SUPREMECIST because he exposes the truth of the тαℓмυd. Neo-Con idiot trads make me sick.

roscoe · « **Reply #3 on:** February 17, 2009, 07:05:45 PM »

All you have to do is say that different races exist and you are immediatly indicted as a 'racist' or WS. This is Communist philosophy.

clare · « **Reply #4 on:** February 18, 2009, 06:11:29 AM »

Quote from: sedetrad

That forum gets sicker and sicker as the days go forward.

Just because a poster takes exception to Michael Hoffman and express her view, the whole forum is getting sicker?? It's not as though he hasn't been supported too!

People on forums disagree!

It happens here too!

clare · « **Reply #5 on:** February 18, 2009, 06:15:43 AM »

I've just searched FE for the words "supremacist" and "Hoffman", and there are only 8 posts with both those words, all from 2005.

The current objection to him, as far as I can tell is that he seems to be a "white separatist".

roscoe · « **Reply #6 on:** February 18, 2009, 12:27:54 PM »

I wonder what Maimonidies thought of Moses marrying a nigerian.

sedetrad · « **Reply #7 on:** February 18, 2009, 01:22:18 PM »

In the United States, white separatist and white supremacist are synonymous. It may be different in England, that I do not know.

clare · « **Reply #8 on:** February 18, 2009, 01:44:53 PM »

Quote from: sedetrad

In the United States, white separatist and white supremacist are synonymous. It may be different in England, that I do not know.

Well, logic alone says that supremacism is not synonymous with separatism.

I'm no separatist, but I can certainly appreciate that separatism is not as bad as supremacism.

sedetrad · « **Reply #9 on:** February 18, 2009, 01:59:32 PM »

I agree that both words definitionally are different but the reality for the majority of US citizens is that both terms are synonymous. Sadly, we do live in 1984 like times.