CathInfo.com

A relatively well known journalist, I might point out one who helped publish Bishop Williamson's letters, was sued by the FSSPX over a year ago. I do not know how the lawsuit played out.

Said man also involved himself with the publishing of Bishop Tissier's essay critical of Pope Benedict XVI, which the FSSPX immediately strove to censor, removing it from public view.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28594546/Faith-Imperiled-by-Reason-Benedict-XVIs-Hermeneutics

A small specimen of the avian persuasion also informed me that the SSPX leadership was "furious" with Bishop Williamson after his infamous interview where he got in trouble for talking about the h0Ɩ0cαųst. That much might be common knowledge. But the official reason why Bishop Williamson was sent to Argentina was not the truth! It was, once again, because of his views on various issues. The official reason was something like: the Bishop had been there for a long time and he has to move on sometime. My informant has assured me this is patently false, and he has spoken with the good Bishop many times.

After reading about Krah, I came to the reluctant conclusion that I must disseminate this information regarding the FSSPX as well, unto the common good.

A relatively well known journalist, I might point out one who helped publish Bishop Williamson's letters, was sued by the FSSPX over a year ago. I do not know how the lawsuit played out.

Said man also involved himself with the publishing of Bishop Tissier's essay critical of Pope Benedict XVI, which the FSSPX immediately strove to censor, removing it from public view.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28594546/Faith-Imperiled-by-Reason-Benedict-XVIs-Hermeneutics

Welcome Informer, and thank you for the information.

I didn't know that Stephen Heiner got sued by the SSPX. That's so sad. The SSPX scares another good man away... :-(
So Krah transformed the SSPX into a sueing company, with "intellectual property" agenda etc. That is very modern.

Stephen's support for Bishop Williamson helped in bringing graces to us catholics worldwide. The four volumes of Bishop Williamson's "Rector's Letters" a very helpful. Also the weekly Eleison Comments save us catholics from being lost in the modern world with its countless traps. Hardly any SSPX priest is either able or allowed to mention these important things in sermons anymore -- at least not in the German zone.
Both apostolates would not exist without Stephen. Also the English translation of Bishop Tissier's book is helpful. It's a complex topic, but makes clearer to us how incredible dangerous BXVI is! The good summarize of it in Bishop Williamson's recent five Eleison Comments explained it in an easy to understand way.  

Thank you Stephen Heiner, may God bless you and your family. May the CRMI profit from devout catholics like you.  

A small specimen of the avian persuasion also informed me that the SSPX leadership was "furious" with Bishop Williamson after his infamous interview where he got in trouble for talking about the h0Ɩ0cαųst. That much might be common knowledge. But the official reason why Bishop Williamson was sent to Argentina was not the truth! It was, once again, because of his views on various issues. The official reason was something like: the Bishop had been there for a long time and he has to move on sometime. My informant has assured me this is patently false, and he has spoken with the good Bishop many times.

Yes, this is well known in European pro Bishop Williamson circles, and I confirm your informant. Thanks for pointing it out to a wider audience. Several good (Lefebvre-) priests were transfered for disciplinary reasons, too. Because either they mentioned the oldest enemies of Our Lord or criticized BXVI.

Suppressing the truth never works. Almighty God will always have the last word!

Quote from: Informer

A relatively well known journalist, I might point out one who helped publish Bishop Williamson's letters, was sued by the FSSPX over a year ago. I do not know how the lawsuit played out.

Said man also involved himself with the publishing of Bishop Tissier's essay critical of Pope Benedict XVI, which the FSSPX immediately strove to censor, removing it from public view.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28594546/Faith-Imperiled-by-Reason-Benedict-XVIs-Hermeneutics

Welcome Informer, and thank you for the information.

I didn't know that Stephen Heiner got sued by the SSPX. That's so sad. The SSPX scares another good man away... :-(
So Krah transformed the SSPX into a sueing company, with "intellectual property" agenda etc. That is very modern.

Stephen's support for Bishop Williamson helped in bringing graces to us catholics worldwide. The four volumes of Bishop Williamson's "Rector's Letters" a very helpful. Also the weekly Eleison Comments save us catholics from being lost in the modern world with its countless traps. Hardly any SSPX priest is either able or allowed to mention these important things in sermons anymore -- at least not in the German zone.
Both apostolates would not exist without Stephen. Also the English translation of Bishop Tissier's book is helpful. It's a complex topic, but makes clearer to us how incredible dangerous BXVI is! The good summarize of it in Bishop Williamson's recent five Eleison Comments explained it in an easy to understand way.  

Thank you Stephen Heiner, may God bless you and your family. May the CRMI profit from devout catholics like you.  

Quote

A small specimen of the avian persuasion also informed me that the SSPX leadership was "furious" with Bishop Williamson after his infamous interview where he got in trouble for talking about the h0Ɩ0cαųst. That much might be common knowledge. But the official reason why Bishop Williamson was sent to Argentina was not the truth! It was, once again, because of his views on various issues. The official reason was something like: the Bishop had been there for a long time and he has to move on sometime. My informant has assured me this is patently false, and he has spoken with the good Bishop many times.

Yes, this is well known in European pro Bishop Williamson circles, and I confirm your informant. Thanks for pointing it out to a wider audience. Several good (Lefebvre-) priests were transfered for disciplinary reasons, too. Because either they mentioned the oldest enemies of Our Lord or criticized BXVI.

Suppressing the truth never works. Almighty God will always have the last word!

Of course at the time the then District Superior for Ireland Fr Angles at request of Bishop Fellay placed a note to state the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' was beyond discussion.It was discussed on Cath Info at the time. The note has since been removed from the Irish SSPX website.

The day the note was read out in one Irish Society chapel a steady line of faithful spent over 30 minutes waiting to speak with the cleric who read out the note. The cleric was ashen faced after speaking with the faithful. They were very angry with the note and the way Bishop Fellay had stabbed Bishop W in the back.
http://www.cathinfo.com/index.php/The-Irish-District-of-the-SSPX-have-betrayed-Bishop-Williamson

"NOTE CONCERNING RECENT EVENTS
February 2009



Recent events make it necessary to say a word about the Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0cαųst.

We want to stress that all the members of the Society in Ireland condemn as false, offensive, and unacceptable any form of anti-Semitism, including the denial or minimization of the Jєωιѕн genocide during World War II. For us it is beyond discussion that a systematic and organized evil plan of persecution and extermination of the Jєωιѕн race took place during the nαzι regime

In relation to Stephen Heiner, Bishop Fellay is on record as having stated "Heiner is a person we should not associate with".