Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: A DREAM OF THE VIRGIN MARY  (Read 6814 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

A DREAM OF THE VIRGIN MARY
« Reply #30 on: October 07, 2012, 10:44:49 PM »
Quote from: Jack in the Box
This dream that my incompetent writing-hand has reported must be important enought for the devil has entered into action at dismissing it in the eyes of the public.


Baloney.

Quote from: Raolu76
I don't think comparing the Virgin Mary to Kirstie Alley is blasphemy


Comparing the Blessed Virgin Mary to a hollywood actress isn't blasphemy? Wow, you are mistaken, I'm afraid.

A DREAM OF THE VIRGIN MARY
« Reply #31 on: October 09, 2012, 02:54:49 PM »
The simily between the Blessed Virgin Mary (who in this case seems to have been Our Lady of Ransom) and a former Hollywood actress might just be a RED HERRING. A Red Herring is a scriptural technique that distracts the reader (or the audience) from the essential of the subject matter. Since I reported verbatim, the said Red Herring did not come from me.

All what the critics seem to have retained is this simily in a description, while the essential message of the dream remains hidden. The essential message will be how, in the context of End Time, Our Blessed Mother Mary will be with us, as us in a very unassuming way in order to assist us, and protect us during the Tribulations.

Why is the "message" hidden in such a way? The "distraction" (or Red Herring) is the same as when Our Lord spoke in parabols. He spoke in parabols so that some who saw remained blind, and some others who hear remained without understanding.

Personally, when I made the posting of this reported dream, I did not put to too much importance on it. I was thinking it to be as insignificant as the other posting titled A VISION OF BLESSED JOSEPH. I was blind. Now, especially after receiving so much hatred, and having seen the viles of the National Inquirer who keeps on pounding on this poor former Hollywood actress in showing grotesques photos of her, because it is evident that this tabloid campaign is a put-down against the Blessed Virgin Mary's image (for I know that the devil reads this blog-site) I know that the "message" is important.

Is the "message" of End Time, which obviously has traction, from the good side or the evil side? Both the nameless "woman and her child" flying-away of A VISION OF BLESSED JOSEPH, and the "practical manner" in which Our Blessed Mother will be by our side during the Tribulation are in line with the Holy Scriptures. The "message" is timely. Remember that His Grace Bishop Williamson has anounced from the pulpit that "We are at the End of Time". The devil is afraid that many will regain confidence in the protection of Our Blessed Mother who will be with us, and who will protect us. I conclude that the two postings are inpired from heaven, or at least edited in such a tactical manner as to have depth in significance while using the forces of evil against itself as an amplifier. The "message", dreaded by the devil being that the Woman with a Child has left for the desert out of the danger posed by the Dragon, and that Our Blessed Mother Mary will protect us. The devil is furious at those two postings.

Lastly: is the "message" unduly alarmist? The reactions caused by the postings go beyond understanding. I think that those reactions come from fear. The End of Time of a subject that causes fear. It is a subject that all wish to avoid; to not talk-about if only in academic terms; or to denigrate; or to ridicule; or to deny in the form of bogus outrage. I must remind to all that fear is a lack of faith. Shall you hate me for writing that? This blog-site is about the SSPX. The SSPX might not recover from the crisis that it has gone through. This might mean that the SSPX will suffer the sqme fate as Rome: It will be disintegrated, and only the faithful who truly love Jesus and Mary will remain protected. Is the message good or evil? The answer will be into your own heart.



A DREAM OF THE VIRGIN MARY
« Reply #32 on: October 09, 2012, 03:06:57 PM »
hey, wondered where jack went to, figured in the desert w/visonary.....apprently with a Hollywood actress now....

A DREAM OF THE VIRGIN MARY
« Reply #33 on: October 09, 2012, 04:08:55 PM »
TO BELLOC: Jack in the Box is fine, thank-you for the inquiry. Since you have an interest in history, I'll tell you a brief story of the State of Nevada.
There was a  ambitious young attorney named Mc. Carran who had his practice in Genoa (a short distance from Carson City). The "case that put him on the map" was the handling of the divorce of a Hollywood star (that was the time of silent-movies). At that time Nevada was the sole state to offer divorces. The requirement for being granted a divorce-bill was a minimum of six months residence. The silent-movie star, therefore lived in Genoa, close to handsome Mc. Carran's office.
After the divorce was pronounced, suddenly Mc. Carran launched into politic, and became Senator. This Senator seemed to have had a well financed campaign, as well as a keen flair for what people wanted.
Senator Mc. Carran is said to have "made" Nevada into what it presently is: a gambling state per excellence, with very liberal laws as opposed to all what was puritan elsewhere. Mc. Carran is honored in Nevada by having the Las Vegas International Airport named after him, as well as by many other honors through the state.
As far as the welfare of Jack in the Box: it is the total opposite to the one of the late Senator.
My love is apolitical, it is for the Truth.
 

A DREAM OF THE VIRGIN MARY
« Reply #34 on: October 09, 2012, 04:26:53 PM »
Quote from: Jack in the Box
Lastly: is the "message" unduly alarmist? The reactions caused by the postings go beyond understanding. I think that those reactions come from fear. The End of Time of a subject that causes fear. It is a subject that all wish to avoid; to not talk-about if only in academic terms; or to denigrate; or to ridicule; or to deny in the form of bogus outrage. I must remind to all that fear is a lack of faith. Shall you hate me for writing that? This blog-site is about the SSPX. The SSPX might not recover from the crisis that it has gone through. This might mean that the SSPX will suffer the same fate as Rome: It will be disintegrated, and only the faithful who truly love Jesus and Mary will remain protected. Is the message good or evil? The answer will be into your own heart.


You are either a misguided Catholic who needs to consult a Traditional priest, or you are a troll who is just mocking the Blessed Virgin Mary and Catholicism in general. The reactions to the JUNK that you posted were just and reasonable, because it was an insult to Our Lady. At first you at least conceded it was not a good description and was glad it was censored, now here you are criticizing those who were rightfully outraged by it and seriously suggesting that it is the devil who is attacking you and your posting.

I have ZERO patience with dirty blasphemers like you who insult the Blessed Virgin Mary. I suggest you go find some other forum to spew your crap on, it isn't welcome here.