Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 62meyer has been banned  (Read 2122 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31168
  • Reputation: +27088/-494
  • Gender: Male
62meyer has been banned
« on: September 19, 2014, 04:22:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I got several complaints that he was disrupting the forum with his constant trolling.

    What made me decide to act was the fact that he was polluting COUNTLESS threads with this same topic. He didn't keep the nonsense to one or two threads.

    I can't shake the feeling that every day he sticks around is 10 minutes I'm going to have to waste at some point, deleting posts by hand. No thanks! I'm too busy for that.

    His trolling consisted of constant "look at me" threads, talking about "Pope Michael" either pro (several months ago) or con (lately). And his criticism is obsessive and puerile in nature.

    He couldn't even be serious about something like souls being led astray or going to hell -- or schism. It's not something to obsessively joke about.

    Anyhow, since his story was questionable to begin with, I decided to ban him.

    Remember, ALL trolls play innocent that they're not trolls, that they're honest, sincere, here to learn, etc. You have to keep that in mind.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2940
    • Reputation: +1090/-2220
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #1 on: September 19, 2014, 04:25:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Deo gratias!
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...


    Offline ggreg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3001
    • Reputation: +184/-179
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #2 on: September 19, 2014, 04:31:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My first prophecy came true.

    Offline Quasimodo

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 159
    • Reputation: +175/-1
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #3 on: September 19, 2014, 10:44:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: ggreg
    My first prophecy came true.
    I never doubted you.

    Thanks, Mathew.

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #4 on: September 19, 2014, 11:36:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As predicted  :smile:
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline Luker

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 507
    • Reputation: +639/-0
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #5 on: September 20, 2014, 09:15:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :pop:

     :rahrah:

     :cheers:
    Pray the Holy Rosary every day!!

    Offline BTNYC

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2777
    • Reputation: +3122/-97
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #6 on: September 20, 2014, 10:25:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Good riddance.
     
    I'll miss him every bit as much as I miss Icterus, Crossbro, Bruce Trickster Ferguson and Impy.

    Offline Mabel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1893
    • Reputation: +1386/-25
    • Gender: Female
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #7 on: September 20, 2014, 10:54:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He is a case for St. Dymphna. We'll entrust him to her care.  :smile:


    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #8 on: September 20, 2014, 01:38:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And Thank God for this very brilliant decision.

    He just did not really know where he stood on "Michael".

    He just went from one extreme to a saner state of mind and
    returned to his extremes.

    He did generate lots of conversation on his state of mind,
    wherever it was at that moment of time.

    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3139
    • Reputation: +2279/-386
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #9 on: September 21, 2014, 01:40:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella
    As predicted  :smile:
    Like no one seen that one coming.

    That's like predicting the sun's going to rise in the morning.  :rolleyes:

    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1776
    • Reputation: +1335/-419
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #10 on: September 22, 2014, 07:27:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I hope that GJC (alias John Calvin redivivus) is next.


    Offline BTNYC

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2777
    • Reputation: +3122/-97
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #11 on: September 22, 2014, 07:53:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: claudel
    I hope that GJC (alias John Calvin redivivus) is next.


    Ah, you mean he who condemns those who take care to make the Thomostic distinction between Objective and Subjective in their judgments as "modernists" and "liberals?"

    Then allow me to add a hearty "Hear, hear!"

    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1776
    • Reputation: +1335/-419
    • Gender: Male
    62meyer has been banned
    « Reply #12 on: September 22, 2014, 08:11:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: BTNYC
    Quote from: claudel
    I hope that GJC (alias John Calvin redivivus) is next.


    Ah, you mean he who condemns those who take care to make the Thomistic distinction between Objective and Subjective in their judgments as "modernists" and "liberals?"

    Then allow me to add a hearty "Hear, hear!"


    That's the guy.