From an over-all viewpoint, there should issue a solid appreciation of the work of a number of Popes done on the subject of the Sect of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ from the time it made its appearance in the 18th century. It showed its anti-religious and anti-social activities as well as its licentiousness and its aims which, from the very beginning, were susceptible of excommunication. It showed also its prodigious development leading to the situation which I already sketched, namely, the duality of forces: one, the forces of evil concentrating in ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry and the other the forces of good, concentrated in one flock under the staff of the one shepherd; (representative of Jesus Christ) who, since 1738 has constantly renewed the appeal for the defense of the Church against Her mortal enemy -- even though in many instances the appeal was useless. Surrounded by Ghettos and Masonic Lodges, in the course of a fight which has become universal, Popes have reiterated their appeal for defense and have clearly shown the place and the duty of Catholics -- all too frequently the place has been left deserted and the duty has been betrayed in a shameful manner. However, even if in our day we are witnessing the terrific confirmation of these truths, it is necessary to remember that they were proclaimed by several Popes.

Curious how the condemnations by the popes against Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ fairly dried up during the reign of Pius IX, who missed the opportunity to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary together with all the bishops of the world.  If he had done that, there would have been no World War II, nor Vat.II.  

Needless to say, since Pius XII likewise dropped the ball, Vat.II and its aftermath now defines our fate, the annihilation of various nations, because the current Freemason-sympathetic Vatican wouldn't dare turn the tide.

Quote from: Miseremini

I think you mean Pius XI

Pius XII (twelfth) dropped the ball by not doing the consecration.  

He also put Annibale Bugnini into office where he could destroy the liturgy.

He also revised Holy Week, the most ancient unchanged liturgy from the entire year.

He also did a number on the Psalms, which was unsuccessful so he had to re-do it a second time.

He also drastically revised the Breviary in a manner that many say was unnecessary.

No, I didn't mean Pius XI.

Throughout all of these many years, this conspiracy’s modus operandi  has been based primarily on secrecy and infiltration — the “destroy from within” technique. Every pontificate since at least Pius IX has felt its sinister presence. Vatican Council II was the culmination of decades of covert, treasonous activity within the Church. It was merely the well-planned victory celebration by the Modernists of their formal takeover of control of the Church.

We do not imply deliberate complicity in the conspiracy by any pope — much less Pius XI or Pius XII. But we do say that long-term infiltration by Modernists, even Communists, into, first, the priesthood, then the schools and seminaries, then the ranks of the bishops, then the Vatican itself, ultimately led to the establishment of a huge Trojan Horse within the Church, a Trojan Horse capable of depriving the pope of the accurate intelligence information, the trustworthy advice, and the loyalty of his subordinates that any Supreme Pontiff would have needed to guide the Bark of Peter safely through the stormy seas that characterized both pontificates.

From: http://catholicism.org/about-sspx.html

Quote from: the linked site

From an over-all viewpoint, there should issue a solid appreciation of the work of a number of Popes done on the subject of the Sect of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ from the time it made its appearance in the 18th century. It showed its anti-religious and anti-social activities as well as its licentiousness and its aims which, from the very beginning, were susceptible of excommunication. It showed also its prodigious development leading to the situation which I already sketched, namely, the duality of forces: one, the forces of evil concentrating in ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry and the other the forces of good, concentrated in one flock under the staff of the one shepherd; (representative of Jesus Christ) who, since 1738 has constantly renewed the appeal for the defense of the Church against Her mortal enemy -- even though in many instances the appeal was useless. Surrounded by Ghettos and Masonic Lodges, in the course of a fight which has become universal, Popes have reiterated their appeal for defense and have clearly shown the place and the duty of Catholics -- all too frequently the place has been left deserted and the duty has been betrayed in a shameful manner. However, even if in our day we are witnessing the terrific confirmation of these truths, it is necessary to remember that they were proclaimed by several Popes.

Curious how the condemnations by the popes against Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ fairly dried up during the reign of Pius IX XI, who missed the opportunity to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary together with all the bishops of the world.  If he had done that, there would have been no World War II, nor Vat.II.  

Needless to say, since Pius XII likewise dropped the ball, Vat.II and its aftermath now defines our fate, the annihilation of various nations, because the current Freemason-sympathetic Vatican wouldn't dare turn the tide.